Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics

Aram Kim, Stephen D. Campbell, Marlos A.G. Viana, Kent L. Knoernschild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color using intraoral spectrophotometric analysis and to compare the clinical outcomes with patient and clinician perception and satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients and four prosthodontic faculty members participated. Abutments were zirconia, gold-hued titanium, and titanium. Peri-implant mucosa color of a single anterior implant restoration was compared to the patient's control tooth. Spectrophotometric analysis using SpectroShadeTM Micro data determined the color difference (ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) between the midfacial peri-implant soft tissue for each abutment material and the marginal gingiva of the control tooth. Color difference values of the abutment groups were compared using ANOVA (α = 0.05). Patient and clinician satisfaction surveys were also conducted using a color-correcting light source. The results of each patient and clinician survey question were compared using chi-square analysis (α = 0.05). Pearson correlation analyses identified the relationship between the total color difference (ΔE) and the patient/clinician perception and satisfaction, as well as between ΔE and tissue thickness. Results: Zirconia abutments displayed significantly smaller spectrophotometric gingival color difference (ΔE) compared to titanium and gold-hued titanium abutments (respectively, 3.98 ± 0.99; 7.22 ± 3.31; 5.65 ± 2.11; p < 0.05). Among ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*, only Δa* (red-green spectrum) showed significant difference between groups. There was no significant correlation between measured soft tissue thickness and ΔE, but thick gingival phenotype, determined by a probe test, demonstrated a smaller ΔE than thin phenotype (4.82 ± 1.49; 6.41 ± 3.27; p = 0.097). There was no statistical difference in patient or clinician satisfaction among abutment materials, and no correlation between ΔE and the patient and clinician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher than clinician, and patient-perceived differences were lower than clinicians’ (p < 0.01). Clinicians’ satisfaction was higher for gingival (pink) esthetics than crown (white) esthetics (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Peri-implant mucosa with zirconia abutments demonstrated significantly lower mean color difference compared to titanium or gold-hued titanium abutments as measured spectrophotometrically; however, no statistical difference in patient or clinician perception/satisfaction among abutment materials was demonstrated. Patients were significantly more satisfied than clinicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)634-640
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Color
Titanium
Patient Satisfaction
Gold
Tooth
Mucous Membrane
Phenotype
Prosthodontics
Gingiva
Crowns
Analysis of Variance
Light

Keywords

  • clinician perception
  • implant esthetics
  • implant restoration
  • patient satisfaction
  • Peri-implant soft tissue
  • titanium abutment
  • zirconia abutment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics. / Kim, Aram; Campbell, Stephen D.; Viana, Marlos A.G.; Knoernschild, Kent L.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 25, No. 8, 01.12.2016, p. 634-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Aram ; Campbell, Stephen D. ; Viana, Marlos A.G. ; Knoernschild, Kent L. / Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 634-640.
@article{c9b2ff81d7494ed4a626724a40e6fc24,
title = "Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color using intraoral spectrophotometric analysis and to compare the clinical outcomes with patient and clinician perception and satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients and four prosthodontic faculty members participated. Abutments were zirconia, gold-hued titanium, and titanium. Peri-implant mucosa color of a single anterior implant restoration was compared to the patient's control tooth. Spectrophotometric analysis using SpectroShadeTM Micro data determined the color difference (ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) between the midfacial peri-implant soft tissue for each abutment material and the marginal gingiva of the control tooth. Color difference values of the abutment groups were compared using ANOVA (α = 0.05). Patient and clinician satisfaction surveys were also conducted using a color-correcting light source. The results of each patient and clinician survey question were compared using chi-square analysis (α = 0.05). Pearson correlation analyses identified the relationship between the total color difference (ΔE) and the patient/clinician perception and satisfaction, as well as between ΔE and tissue thickness. Results: Zirconia abutments displayed significantly smaller spectrophotometric gingival color difference (ΔE) compared to titanium and gold-hued titanium abutments (respectively, 3.98 ± 0.99; 7.22 ± 3.31; 5.65 ± 2.11; p < 0.05). Among ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*, only Δa* (red-green spectrum) showed significant difference between groups. There was no significant correlation between measured soft tissue thickness and ΔE, but thick gingival phenotype, determined by a probe test, demonstrated a smaller ΔE than thin phenotype (4.82 ± 1.49; 6.41 ± 3.27; p = 0.097). There was no statistical difference in patient or clinician satisfaction among abutment materials, and no correlation between ΔE and the patient and clinician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher than clinician, and patient-perceived differences were lower than clinicians’ (p < 0.01). Clinicians’ satisfaction was higher for gingival (pink) esthetics than crown (white) esthetics (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Peri-implant mucosa with zirconia abutments demonstrated significantly lower mean color difference compared to titanium or gold-hued titanium abutments as measured spectrophotometrically; however, no statistical difference in patient or clinician perception/satisfaction among abutment materials was demonstrated. Patients were significantly more satisfied than clinicians.",
keywords = "clinician perception, implant esthetics, implant restoration, patient satisfaction, Peri-implant soft tissue, titanium abutment, zirconia abutment",
author = "Aram Kim and Campbell, {Stephen D.} and Viana, {Marlos A.G.} and Knoernschild, {Kent L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopr.12360",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "634--640",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics

AU - Kim, Aram

AU - Campbell, Stephen D.

AU - Viana, Marlos A.G.

AU - Knoernschild, Kent L.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color using intraoral spectrophotometric analysis and to compare the clinical outcomes with patient and clinician perception and satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients and four prosthodontic faculty members participated. Abutments were zirconia, gold-hued titanium, and titanium. Peri-implant mucosa color of a single anterior implant restoration was compared to the patient's control tooth. Spectrophotometric analysis using SpectroShadeTM Micro data determined the color difference (ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) between the midfacial peri-implant soft tissue for each abutment material and the marginal gingiva of the control tooth. Color difference values of the abutment groups were compared using ANOVA (α = 0.05). Patient and clinician satisfaction surveys were also conducted using a color-correcting light source. The results of each patient and clinician survey question were compared using chi-square analysis (α = 0.05). Pearson correlation analyses identified the relationship between the total color difference (ΔE) and the patient/clinician perception and satisfaction, as well as between ΔE and tissue thickness. Results: Zirconia abutments displayed significantly smaller spectrophotometric gingival color difference (ΔE) compared to titanium and gold-hued titanium abutments (respectively, 3.98 ± 0.99; 7.22 ± 3.31; 5.65 ± 2.11; p < 0.05). Among ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*, only Δa* (red-green spectrum) showed significant difference between groups. There was no significant correlation between measured soft tissue thickness and ΔE, but thick gingival phenotype, determined by a probe test, demonstrated a smaller ΔE than thin phenotype (4.82 ± 1.49; 6.41 ± 3.27; p = 0.097). There was no statistical difference in patient or clinician satisfaction among abutment materials, and no correlation between ΔE and the patient and clinician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher than clinician, and patient-perceived differences were lower than clinicians’ (p < 0.01). Clinicians’ satisfaction was higher for gingival (pink) esthetics than crown (white) esthetics (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Peri-implant mucosa with zirconia abutments demonstrated significantly lower mean color difference compared to titanium or gold-hued titanium abutments as measured spectrophotometrically; however, no statistical difference in patient or clinician perception/satisfaction among abutment materials was demonstrated. Patients were significantly more satisfied than clinicians.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant abutment material on peri-implant soft tissue color using intraoral spectrophotometric analysis and to compare the clinical outcomes with patient and clinician perception and satisfaction. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients and four prosthodontic faculty members participated. Abutments were zirconia, gold-hued titanium, and titanium. Peri-implant mucosa color of a single anterior implant restoration was compared to the patient's control tooth. Spectrophotometric analysis using SpectroShadeTM Micro data determined the color difference (ΔE, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*) between the midfacial peri-implant soft tissue for each abutment material and the marginal gingiva of the control tooth. Color difference values of the abutment groups were compared using ANOVA (α = 0.05). Patient and clinician satisfaction surveys were also conducted using a color-correcting light source. The results of each patient and clinician survey question were compared using chi-square analysis (α = 0.05). Pearson correlation analyses identified the relationship between the total color difference (ΔE) and the patient/clinician perception and satisfaction, as well as between ΔE and tissue thickness. Results: Zirconia abutments displayed significantly smaller spectrophotometric gingival color difference (ΔE) compared to titanium and gold-hued titanium abutments (respectively, 3.98 ± 0.99; 7.22 ± 3.31; 5.65 ± 2.11; p < 0.05). Among ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb*, only Δa* (red-green spectrum) showed significant difference between groups. There was no significant correlation between measured soft tissue thickness and ΔE, but thick gingival phenotype, determined by a probe test, demonstrated a smaller ΔE than thin phenotype (4.82 ± 1.49; 6.41 ± 3.27; p = 0.097). There was no statistical difference in patient or clinician satisfaction among abutment materials, and no correlation between ΔE and the patient and clinician satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher than clinician, and patient-perceived differences were lower than clinicians’ (p < 0.01). Clinicians’ satisfaction was higher for gingival (pink) esthetics than crown (white) esthetics (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Peri-implant mucosa with zirconia abutments demonstrated significantly lower mean color difference compared to titanium or gold-hued titanium abutments as measured spectrophotometrically; however, no statistical difference in patient or clinician perception/satisfaction among abutment materials was demonstrated. Patients were significantly more satisfied than clinicians.

KW - clinician perception

KW - implant esthetics

KW - implant restoration

KW - patient satisfaction

KW - Peri-implant soft tissue

KW - titanium abutment

KW - zirconia abutment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945391571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945391571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopr.12360

DO - 10.1111/jopr.12360

M3 - Article

C2 - 26398106

AN - SCOPUS:84945391571

VL - 25

SP - 634

EP - 640

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 8

ER -