Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis

William D. Paulson, Merit F. Gadallah, Barry J. Bieber, Sanford D. Altman, Carolyn G. Birk, Jack Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. There is wide disagreement among studies that have evaluated the accuracy of urea recirculation (UR) in detecting vascular access stenosis. The 3-site method (UR3) has been discredited and replaced by the 2-site method (UR2), but few studies have evaluated UR2. Methods. We compared the accuracies of UR2 and UR3 in detecting stenosis in 59 haemodialysis patients during a 12-month period. All patients were studied without regard to clinical suspicion of stenosis. Stenosis (≤ 50% luminal narrowing) was diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and confirmed by angiography. The reproducibility of UR2 was determined by computing its total standard deviation (SD(TOT)) from measurements during three dialysis sessions over a 15-day period. Results. Stenosis was found in 32% of 124 access studies (mean luminal narrowing = 58%, range = 50%-83%). The mean UR values of stenotic accesses were only slightly higher than non-stenotic accesses for both UR2 (5.6% vs 2.9%, P < 0.01) and UR3 (13.1% vs 11.2%, P = 0.22). An increase in blood pump speed from 300 to 425 ml/min did not improve detection of stenosis by UR2. There were no UR thresholds that could adequately separate the presence of stenosis from its absence. The SD(TOT) of UR2 was 3.%, indicating that a patient's UR2 measurement may vary over a range of 16% (± 2SD(TOT) = ± 8%). Conclusion. Stenosis of the haemodialysis access does not predictably cause recirculation, and the reproducibility of the UR2 measurement is poor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-124
Number of pages7
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Renal Dialysis
Urea
Pathologic Constriction
Blood Vessels
Dialysis
Angiography

Keywords

  • Blood urea nitrogen
  • Blood-vessel prosthesis
  • Dialysis
  • Recirculation
  • Ultrasonography
  • Vascular patency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis. / Paulson, William D.; Gadallah, Merit F.; Bieber, Barry J.; Altman, Sanford D.; Birk, Carolyn G.; Work, Jack.

In: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 118-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paulson, William D. ; Gadallah, Merit F. ; Bieber, Barry J. ; Altman, Sanford D. ; Birk, Carolyn G. ; Work, Jack. / Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis. In: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 1998 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 118-124.
@article{412026049b284704afe6727678353eda,
title = "Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis",
abstract = "Background. There is wide disagreement among studies that have evaluated the accuracy of urea recirculation (UR) in detecting vascular access stenosis. The 3-site method (UR3) has been discredited and replaced by the 2-site method (UR2), but few studies have evaluated UR2. Methods. We compared the accuracies of UR2 and UR3 in detecting stenosis in 59 haemodialysis patients during a 12-month period. All patients were studied without regard to clinical suspicion of stenosis. Stenosis (≤ 50{\%} luminal narrowing) was diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and confirmed by angiography. The reproducibility of UR2 was determined by computing its total standard deviation (SD(TOT)) from measurements during three dialysis sessions over a 15-day period. Results. Stenosis was found in 32{\%} of 124 access studies (mean luminal narrowing = 58{\%}, range = 50{\%}-83{\%}). The mean UR values of stenotic accesses were only slightly higher than non-stenotic accesses for both UR2 (5.6{\%} vs 2.9{\%}, P < 0.01) and UR3 (13.1{\%} vs 11.2{\%}, P = 0.22). An increase in blood pump speed from 300 to 425 ml/min did not improve detection of stenosis by UR2. There were no UR thresholds that could adequately separate the presence of stenosis from its absence. The SD(TOT) of UR2 was 3.{\%}, indicating that a patient's UR2 measurement may vary over a range of 16{\%} (± 2SD(TOT) = ± 8{\%}). Conclusion. Stenosis of the haemodialysis access does not predictably cause recirculation, and the reproducibility of the UR2 measurement is poor.",
keywords = "Blood urea nitrogen, Blood-vessel prosthesis, Dialysis, Recirculation, Ultrasonography, Vascular patency",
author = "Paulson, {William D.} and Gadallah, {Merit F.} and Bieber, {Barry J.} and Altman, {Sanford D.} and Birk, {Carolyn G.} and Jack Work",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ndt/13.1.118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "118--124",
journal = "Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation",
issn = "0931-0509",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy and reproducibility of urea recirculation in detecting haemodialysis access stenosis

AU - Paulson, William D.

AU - Gadallah, Merit F.

AU - Bieber, Barry J.

AU - Altman, Sanford D.

AU - Birk, Carolyn G.

AU - Work, Jack

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Background. There is wide disagreement among studies that have evaluated the accuracy of urea recirculation (UR) in detecting vascular access stenosis. The 3-site method (UR3) has been discredited and replaced by the 2-site method (UR2), but few studies have evaluated UR2. Methods. We compared the accuracies of UR2 and UR3 in detecting stenosis in 59 haemodialysis patients during a 12-month period. All patients were studied without regard to clinical suspicion of stenosis. Stenosis (≤ 50% luminal narrowing) was diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and confirmed by angiography. The reproducibility of UR2 was determined by computing its total standard deviation (SD(TOT)) from measurements during three dialysis sessions over a 15-day period. Results. Stenosis was found in 32% of 124 access studies (mean luminal narrowing = 58%, range = 50%-83%). The mean UR values of stenotic accesses were only slightly higher than non-stenotic accesses for both UR2 (5.6% vs 2.9%, P < 0.01) and UR3 (13.1% vs 11.2%, P = 0.22). An increase in blood pump speed from 300 to 425 ml/min did not improve detection of stenosis by UR2. There were no UR thresholds that could adequately separate the presence of stenosis from its absence. The SD(TOT) of UR2 was 3.%, indicating that a patient's UR2 measurement may vary over a range of 16% (± 2SD(TOT) = ± 8%). Conclusion. Stenosis of the haemodialysis access does not predictably cause recirculation, and the reproducibility of the UR2 measurement is poor.

AB - Background. There is wide disagreement among studies that have evaluated the accuracy of urea recirculation (UR) in detecting vascular access stenosis. The 3-site method (UR3) has been discredited and replaced by the 2-site method (UR2), but few studies have evaluated UR2. Methods. We compared the accuracies of UR2 and UR3 in detecting stenosis in 59 haemodialysis patients during a 12-month period. All patients were studied without regard to clinical suspicion of stenosis. Stenosis (≤ 50% luminal narrowing) was diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and confirmed by angiography. The reproducibility of UR2 was determined by computing its total standard deviation (SD(TOT)) from measurements during three dialysis sessions over a 15-day period. Results. Stenosis was found in 32% of 124 access studies (mean luminal narrowing = 58%, range = 50%-83%). The mean UR values of stenotic accesses were only slightly higher than non-stenotic accesses for both UR2 (5.6% vs 2.9%, P < 0.01) and UR3 (13.1% vs 11.2%, P = 0.22). An increase in blood pump speed from 300 to 425 ml/min did not improve detection of stenosis by UR2. There were no UR thresholds that could adequately separate the presence of stenosis from its absence. The SD(TOT) of UR2 was 3.%, indicating that a patient's UR2 measurement may vary over a range of 16% (± 2SD(TOT) = ± 8%). Conclusion. Stenosis of the haemodialysis access does not predictably cause recirculation, and the reproducibility of the UR2 measurement is poor.

KW - Blood urea nitrogen

KW - Blood-vessel prosthesis

KW - Dialysis

KW - Recirculation

KW - Ultrasonography

KW - Vascular patency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031962774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031962774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ndt/13.1.118

DO - 10.1093/ndt/13.1.118

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 118

EP - 124

JO - Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

JF - Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

SN - 0931-0509

IS - 1

ER -