Abstract
Objective To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Study Design Retrospective observational study. Methods Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with p16-positive HNSCC and with cervical lymph node metastases measuring at least 1 centimeter in diameter on pathological assessment were included. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Subjects' preoperative contrast-enhanced neck CT scans were independently assigned a score for the likelihood of ECS (5-point scale) by two board-certified neuroradiologists. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated, and optimal sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each radiologist. Results On histological analysis, the majority of patients (58%; 38/65) were found to have ECS, and 29% (19/65) of patients had ≥ three metastatic lymph nodes. For radiologist 1, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53%-87%) and 53% (95% CI, 36%-70%), respectively. For radiologist 2, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 82% (95% CI, 60 %-95%) and 53% (95% CI, 38%-69%), respectively. Conclusion CT is not a reliable method for determining the presence of ECS in p16-positive HNSCC patients.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1613-1618 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Laryngoscope |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Extracapsular spread
- HPV
- computed tomography
- p16
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Otorhinolaryngology
Cite this
Accuracy of computed tomography to predict extracapsular spread in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma. / Maxwell, Jessica H.; Rath, Tanya J.; Byrd, James K.; Albergotti, William G.; Wang, Hong; Duvvuri, Umamaheswar; Kim, Seungwon; Johnson, Jonas T.; Branstetter, Barton F.; Ferris, Robert L.
In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 125, No. 7, 01.07.2015, p. 1613-1618.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of computed tomography to predict extracapsular spread in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma
AU - Maxwell, Jessica H.
AU - Rath, Tanya J.
AU - Byrd, James K.
AU - Albergotti, William G.
AU - Wang, Hong
AU - Duvvuri, Umamaheswar
AU - Kim, Seungwon
AU - Johnson, Jonas T.
AU - Branstetter, Barton F.
AU - Ferris, Robert L.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - Objective To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Study Design Retrospective observational study. Methods Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with p16-positive HNSCC and with cervical lymph node metastases measuring at least 1 centimeter in diameter on pathological assessment were included. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Subjects' preoperative contrast-enhanced neck CT scans were independently assigned a score for the likelihood of ECS (5-point scale) by two board-certified neuroradiologists. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated, and optimal sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each radiologist. Results On histological analysis, the majority of patients (58%; 38/65) were found to have ECS, and 29% (19/65) of patients had ≥ three metastatic lymph nodes. For radiologist 1, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53%-87%) and 53% (95% CI, 36%-70%), respectively. For radiologist 2, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 82% (95% CI, 60 %-95%) and 53% (95% CI, 38%-69%), respectively. Conclusion CT is not a reliable method for determining the presence of ECS in p16-positive HNSCC patients.
AB - Objective To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Study Design Retrospective observational study. Methods Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with p16-positive HNSCC and with cervical lymph node metastases measuring at least 1 centimeter in diameter on pathological assessment were included. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Subjects' preoperative contrast-enhanced neck CT scans were independently assigned a score for the likelihood of ECS (5-point scale) by two board-certified neuroradiologists. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated, and optimal sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each radiologist. Results On histological analysis, the majority of patients (58%; 38/65) were found to have ECS, and 29% (19/65) of patients had ≥ three metastatic lymph nodes. For radiologist 1, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53%-87%) and 53% (95% CI, 36%-70%), respectively. For radiologist 2, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 82% (95% CI, 60 %-95%) and 53% (95% CI, 38%-69%), respectively. Conclusion CT is not a reliable method for determining the presence of ECS in p16-positive HNSCC patients.
KW - Extracapsular spread
KW - HPV
KW - computed tomography
KW - p16
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932197775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932197775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.25140
DO - 10.1002/lary.25140
M3 - Article
C2 - 25946149
AN - SCOPUS:84932197775
VL - 125
SP - 1613
EP - 1618
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
SN - 0023-852X
IS - 7
ER -