Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis

William D. Paulson, Sunanda J. Ram, Carolyn G. Birk, Mary Zapczynski, Shelley R. Martin, Jack Work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We recently showed that a single low graft blood-flow measurement (Qa) does not accurately predict graft thrombosis. In this study, we prospectively determined whether percentage of decrease in Qa (ΔQa) or adjustment of Qa for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP; Δ(Qa/MAP)) provides greater predictive accuracy than a single Qa. We monitored 83 grafts from 80 patients for thrombosis over periods up to 12 months. Qa (by ultrasound dilution) and MAP were measured monthly during the study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether Qa, ΔQa, Qa/MAP, or Δ(Qa/MAP) provided the combination of high sensitivity (>80%) and low false-positive rate (FPR; <20%) needed for clinical use. This level of predictive accuracy requires an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.90. We analyzed the four predictors by a number of criteria and found that all AUCs were less than 0.90 and adjustment for MAP reduced the AMC. In predicting thrombosis within 1 month, for example, AUCs for Qa and net ΔQa (over 3 months) were 0.84 and 0.82, respectively, whereas AUCs for Qa/MAP and net Δ(Qa/MAP) were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. At a sensitivity of 80%, FPRs for all predictors were at least 30%. Thus, a high sensitivity always required a high FPR. These results show that ΔQa and adjustment for MAP are not more accurate than a single low Qa in predicting thrombosis. None of these predictors provide enough predictive accuracy to be the sole criterion for clinical decision making. A successful monitoring and intervention program will likely require the inclusion of other predictors that, together with Qa, may provide the needed accuracy. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1095
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Area Under Curve
Renal Dialysis
Thrombosis
Transplants
ROC Curve
Arterial Pressure

Keywords

  • Blood vessel prosthesis
  • Graft blood flow (Qa)
  • Hemodialysis (HD)
  • Stenosis
  • Thrombosis
  • Vascular graft occlusion
  • Vascular patency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis. / Paulson, William D.; Ram, Sunanda J.; Birk, Carolyn G.; Zapczynski, Mary; Martin, Shelley R.; Work, Jack.

In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, Vol. 35, No. 6, 01.01.2000, p. 1089-1095.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Paulson, William D. ; Ram, Sunanda J. ; Birk, Carolyn G. ; Zapczynski, Mary ; Martin, Shelley R. ; Work, Jack. / Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis. In: American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2000 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 1089-1095.
@article{8a8d291f8d96490b9dd8dd6a1477f2d8,
title = "Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis",
abstract = "We recently showed that a single low graft blood-flow measurement (Qa) does not accurately predict graft thrombosis. In this study, we prospectively determined whether percentage of decrease in Qa (ΔQa) or adjustment of Qa for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP; Δ(Qa/MAP)) provides greater predictive accuracy than a single Qa. We monitored 83 grafts from 80 patients for thrombosis over periods up to 12 months. Qa (by ultrasound dilution) and MAP were measured monthly during the study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether Qa, ΔQa, Qa/MAP, or Δ(Qa/MAP) provided the combination of high sensitivity (>80{\%}) and low false-positive rate (FPR; <20{\%}) needed for clinical use. This level of predictive accuracy requires an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.90. We analyzed the four predictors by a number of criteria and found that all AUCs were less than 0.90 and adjustment for MAP reduced the AMC. In predicting thrombosis within 1 month, for example, AUCs for Qa and net ΔQa (over 3 months) were 0.84 and 0.82, respectively, whereas AUCs for Qa/MAP and net Δ(Qa/MAP) were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. At a sensitivity of 80{\%}, FPRs for all predictors were at least 30{\%}. Thus, a high sensitivity always required a high FPR. These results show that ΔQa and adjustment for MAP are not more accurate than a single low Qa in predicting thrombosis. None of these predictors provide enough predictive accuracy to be the sole criterion for clinical decision making. A successful monitoring and intervention program will likely require the inclusion of other predictors that, together with Qa, may provide the needed accuracy. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.",
keywords = "Blood vessel prosthesis, Graft blood flow (Qa), Hemodialysis (HD), Stenosis, Thrombosis, Vascular graft occlusion, Vascular patency",
author = "Paulson, {William D.} and Ram, {Sunanda J.} and Birk, {Carolyn G.} and Mary Zapczynski and Martin, {Shelley R.} and Jack Work",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70045-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1089--1095",
journal = "American Journal of Kidney Diseases",
issn = "0272-6386",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis

AU - Paulson, William D.

AU - Ram, Sunanda J.

AU - Birk, Carolyn G.

AU - Zapczynski, Mary

AU - Martin, Shelley R.

AU - Work, Jack

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - We recently showed that a single low graft blood-flow measurement (Qa) does not accurately predict graft thrombosis. In this study, we prospectively determined whether percentage of decrease in Qa (ΔQa) or adjustment of Qa for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP; Δ(Qa/MAP)) provides greater predictive accuracy than a single Qa. We monitored 83 grafts from 80 patients for thrombosis over periods up to 12 months. Qa (by ultrasound dilution) and MAP were measured monthly during the study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether Qa, ΔQa, Qa/MAP, or Δ(Qa/MAP) provided the combination of high sensitivity (>80%) and low false-positive rate (FPR; <20%) needed for clinical use. This level of predictive accuracy requires an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.90. We analyzed the four predictors by a number of criteria and found that all AUCs were less than 0.90 and adjustment for MAP reduced the AMC. In predicting thrombosis within 1 month, for example, AUCs for Qa and net ΔQa (over 3 months) were 0.84 and 0.82, respectively, whereas AUCs for Qa/MAP and net Δ(Qa/MAP) were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. At a sensitivity of 80%, FPRs for all predictors were at least 30%. Thus, a high sensitivity always required a high FPR. These results show that ΔQa and adjustment for MAP are not more accurate than a single low Qa in predicting thrombosis. None of these predictors provide enough predictive accuracy to be the sole criterion for clinical decision making. A successful monitoring and intervention program will likely require the inclusion of other predictors that, together with Qa, may provide the needed accuracy. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

AB - We recently showed that a single low graft blood-flow measurement (Qa) does not accurately predict graft thrombosis. In this study, we prospectively determined whether percentage of decrease in Qa (ΔQa) or adjustment of Qa for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP; Δ(Qa/MAP)) provides greater predictive accuracy than a single Qa. We monitored 83 grafts from 80 patients for thrombosis over periods up to 12 months. Qa (by ultrasound dilution) and MAP were measured monthly during the study. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether Qa, ΔQa, Qa/MAP, or Δ(Qa/MAP) provided the combination of high sensitivity (>80%) and low false-positive rate (FPR; <20%) needed for clinical use. This level of predictive accuracy requires an area under the curve (AUC) of approximately 0.90. We analyzed the four predictors by a number of criteria and found that all AUCs were less than 0.90 and adjustment for MAP reduced the AMC. In predicting thrombosis within 1 month, for example, AUCs for Qa and net ΔQa (over 3 months) were 0.84 and 0.82, respectively, whereas AUCs for Qa/MAP and net Δ(Qa/MAP) were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. At a sensitivity of 80%, FPRs for all predictors were at least 30%. Thus, a high sensitivity always required a high FPR. These results show that ΔQa and adjustment for MAP are not more accurate than a single low Qa in predicting thrombosis. None of these predictors provide enough predictive accuracy to be the sole criterion for clinical decision making. A successful monitoring and intervention program will likely require the inclusion of other predictors that, together with Qa, may provide the needed accuracy. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

KW - Blood vessel prosthesis

KW - Graft blood flow (Qa)

KW - Hemodialysis (HD)

KW - Stenosis

KW - Thrombosis

KW - Vascular graft occlusion

KW - Vascular patency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034042549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034042549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70045-X

DO - 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70045-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 10845822

AN - SCOPUS:0034042549

VL - 35

SP - 1089

EP - 1095

JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases

SN - 0272-6386

IS - 6

ER -