Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis: an Application to Resting State Networks

Deepak Nag Ayyala, Anindya Roy, Junyong Park, Rao P. Gullapalli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Resting State Network (RSN) analysis investigates spontaneous brain activity when the brain is not subjected to any external stimuli. The interest in RSN analysis lies primarily in understanding the interaction between different brain regions that occur while the brain is “at rest”, i.e., not prompted by external tasks. The network of brain regions involved and their activity during the resting state has been found to be consistent across broad population and thus could be helpful in identifying aberrations in individual brains or effects of particular adverse events. Testing for functional consistency in RSN requires analysis of time series patterns for multiple time series signal emanating from the different brain regions. An approach for studying reproducibility is testing for stability in the cross-correlations function of the multiple time series signal. However, often the testing procedures do not adequately account for the temporal dependence in the signal and may lead to erroneous conclusion, particularly in the presence of confounder such as scan-to-scan and visit-to-visit variation. In this article, we develop a general paradigm for testing for such confounder in the cross-correlation analysis. Merit of the proposal is demonstrated via simulation and the proposed test is shown to have reasonable type I error and power under a variety of dependence structures for the multivariate signals. The methodology is then applied to the motivating data set involving a motor network and it is shown that unless properly controlled, confounders can significantly affect the test of reproducibility of the network. Once the analysis is adjusted for confounders, the findings reaffirm the conventional wisdom about reproducibility of RSN.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages123-150
Number of pages28
JournalSankhya B
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Correlation Analysis
Cross-correlation
Brain
Reproducibility
Electric network analysis
Multiple Time Series
Time series
Testing
Network Analysis
Cross-correlation Function
Type I error
Dependence Structure
Correlation analysis
Aberrations
Aberration
Paradigm
Methodology
Interaction
Network analysis
Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis : an Application to Resting State Networks. / Ayyala, Deepak Nag; Roy, Anindya; Park, Junyong; Gullapalli, Rao P.

In: Sankhya B, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.05.2018, p. 123-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ayyala, Deepak Nag ; Roy, Anindya ; Park, Junyong ; Gullapalli, Rao P. / Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis : an Application to Resting State Networks. In: Sankhya B. 2018 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 123-150.
@article{440efa697de24bf38e7e668bcb73e5a2,
title = "Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis: an Application to Resting State Networks",
abstract = "Resting State Network (RSN) analysis investigates spontaneous brain activity when the brain is not subjected to any external stimuli. The interest in RSN analysis lies primarily in understanding the interaction between different brain regions that occur while the brain is “at rest”, i.e., not prompted by external tasks. The network of brain regions involved and their activity during the resting state has been found to be consistent across broad population and thus could be helpful in identifying aberrations in individual brains or effects of particular adverse events. Testing for functional consistency in RSN requires analysis of time series patterns for multiple time series signal emanating from the different brain regions. An approach for studying reproducibility is testing for stability in the cross-correlations function of the multiple time series signal. However, often the testing procedures do not adequately account for the temporal dependence in the signal and may lead to erroneous conclusion, particularly in the presence of confounder such as scan-to-scan and visit-to-visit variation. In this article, we develop a general paradigm for testing for such confounder in the cross-correlation analysis. Merit of the proposal is demonstrated via simulation and the proposed test is shown to have reasonable type I error and power under a variety of dependence structures for the multivariate signals. The methodology is then applied to the motivating data set involving a motor network and it is shown that unless properly controlled, confounders can significantly affect the test of reproducibility of the network. Once the analysis is adjusted for confounders, the findings reaffirm the conventional wisdom about reproducibility of RSN.",
author = "Ayyala, {Deepak Nag} and Anindya Roy and Junyong Park and Gullapalli, {Rao P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13571-017-0138-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "123--150",
journal = "Sankhya B",
issn = "0976-8386",
publisher = "Springer India",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjusting for Confounders in Cross-correlation Analysis

T2 - Sankhya B

AU - Ayyala, Deepak Nag

AU - Roy, Anindya

AU - Park, Junyong

AU - Gullapalli, Rao P.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Resting State Network (RSN) analysis investigates spontaneous brain activity when the brain is not subjected to any external stimuli. The interest in RSN analysis lies primarily in understanding the interaction between different brain regions that occur while the brain is “at rest”, i.e., not prompted by external tasks. The network of brain regions involved and their activity during the resting state has been found to be consistent across broad population and thus could be helpful in identifying aberrations in individual brains or effects of particular adverse events. Testing for functional consistency in RSN requires analysis of time series patterns for multiple time series signal emanating from the different brain regions. An approach for studying reproducibility is testing for stability in the cross-correlations function of the multiple time series signal. However, often the testing procedures do not adequately account for the temporal dependence in the signal and may lead to erroneous conclusion, particularly in the presence of confounder such as scan-to-scan and visit-to-visit variation. In this article, we develop a general paradigm for testing for such confounder in the cross-correlation analysis. Merit of the proposal is demonstrated via simulation and the proposed test is shown to have reasonable type I error and power under a variety of dependence structures for the multivariate signals. The methodology is then applied to the motivating data set involving a motor network and it is shown that unless properly controlled, confounders can significantly affect the test of reproducibility of the network. Once the analysis is adjusted for confounders, the findings reaffirm the conventional wisdom about reproducibility of RSN.

AB - Resting State Network (RSN) analysis investigates spontaneous brain activity when the brain is not subjected to any external stimuli. The interest in RSN analysis lies primarily in understanding the interaction between different brain regions that occur while the brain is “at rest”, i.e., not prompted by external tasks. The network of brain regions involved and their activity during the resting state has been found to be consistent across broad population and thus could be helpful in identifying aberrations in individual brains or effects of particular adverse events. Testing for functional consistency in RSN requires analysis of time series patterns for multiple time series signal emanating from the different brain regions. An approach for studying reproducibility is testing for stability in the cross-correlations function of the multiple time series signal. However, often the testing procedures do not adequately account for the temporal dependence in the signal and may lead to erroneous conclusion, particularly in the presence of confounder such as scan-to-scan and visit-to-visit variation. In this article, we develop a general paradigm for testing for such confounder in the cross-correlation analysis. Merit of the proposal is demonstrated via simulation and the proposed test is shown to have reasonable type I error and power under a variety of dependence structures for the multivariate signals. The methodology is then applied to the motivating data set involving a motor network and it is shown that unless properly controlled, confounders can significantly affect the test of reproducibility of the network. Once the analysis is adjusted for confounders, the findings reaffirm the conventional wisdom about reproducibility of RSN.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034025767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034025767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13571-017-0138-x

DO - 10.1007/s13571-017-0138-x

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 123

EP - 150

JO - Sankhya B

JF - Sankhya B

SN - 0976-8386

IS - 1

ER -