Abstract
This literature review was performed to illustrate and compare different alveolar ridge augmentation procedures before dental implant placement. The review was based on clinical and research studies listed in Pubmed. There is not enough evidence to support any single method as gold standard for any given condition, and choice seemed to be based on personal preferences. There is a lack of long-term survival data or success rates of grafting materials regarding donor and recipient sites. Although ridge splitting and distraction osteogenesis techniques eliminate donor site morbidity, circumvent the use of grafting materials, and reduce the operation time, some disadvantages and limitations should be considered. More studies are needed to compare the fate and characteristics of new bone obtained by these different procedures, as well as subsequent implant survival rates.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue number | SUPPL. 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1 2012 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Oral Surgery
- Dentistry (miscellaneous)
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cite this
Alveolar ridge augmentation for implant fixation : Status review. / Zakhary, Ibrahim E.; El-Mekkawi, Hatem A.; Elsalanty, Mohammed Elsayed.
In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Vol. 114, No. SUPPL. 5, 01.11.2012.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Alveolar ridge augmentation for implant fixation
T2 - Status review
AU - Zakhary, Ibrahim E.
AU - El-Mekkawi, Hatem A.
AU - Elsalanty, Mohammed Elsayed
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - This literature review was performed to illustrate and compare different alveolar ridge augmentation procedures before dental implant placement. The review was based on clinical and research studies listed in Pubmed. There is not enough evidence to support any single method as gold standard for any given condition, and choice seemed to be based on personal preferences. There is a lack of long-term survival data or success rates of grafting materials regarding donor and recipient sites. Although ridge splitting and distraction osteogenesis techniques eliminate donor site morbidity, circumvent the use of grafting materials, and reduce the operation time, some disadvantages and limitations should be considered. More studies are needed to compare the fate and characteristics of new bone obtained by these different procedures, as well as subsequent implant survival rates.
AB - This literature review was performed to illustrate and compare different alveolar ridge augmentation procedures before dental implant placement. The review was based on clinical and research studies listed in Pubmed. There is not enough evidence to support any single method as gold standard for any given condition, and choice seemed to be based on personal preferences. There is a lack of long-term survival data or success rates of grafting materials regarding donor and recipient sites. Although ridge splitting and distraction osteogenesis techniques eliminate donor site morbidity, circumvent the use of grafting materials, and reduce the operation time, some disadvantages and limitations should be considered. More studies are needed to compare the fate and characteristics of new bone obtained by these different procedures, as well as subsequent implant survival rates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867480382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867480382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.09.031
DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.09.031
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23063396
AN - SCOPUS:84867480382
VL - 114
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
SN - 2212-4403
IS - SUPPL. 5
ER -