Ambulatory monitoring in the evaluation of blood pressure in patients with borderline hypertension and the role of the defense reflex

Thomas G. Pickering, Gregory A. Harshfield, Hollis D. Kleinert, John H. Laragh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The differences between blood pressure (BP) readings taken in the clinic and during normal daily activities were assessed in two studies using a noninvasive ambulatory BP monitor (Avionics). In the first study 30 untreated hypertensive patients (17 with borderline pressures, average diastolic 95, and 13 established hypertensives, diastolics above 95) and 5 normotensive subjects had 30 readings taken in the physician's office and 30 while at home. Conventional sphygmomanometer BPs were also recorded in the office. In the borderline group home BPs were significantly lower than clinic BPs, whereas this difference was less marked for the established and normotensive group. In the second study BP was measured every 15 minutes for 24 hours in 25 normal subjects, 25 borderline and 25 established hypertensives, and readings categorized according to four recording situations: physician's office, work, at home, and sleep. BPs in all groups were highest at work and lowest asleep, and directional changes were similar. Both hypertensive groups showed higher BPs in the physician's office than at home, while normal subjects showed no difference. BPs recorded in the physician's office were good predictors of 24 hour average BP in normal and established hypertensive subjects, but not in the borderline group: in such patients 24 hour monitoring may be of particular value in evaluating the need for treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-693
Number of pages19
JournalClinical and experimental hypertension
VolumeA4
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Monitoring
Physicians' Offices
Reflex
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Reading
Blood Pressure Monitors
Group Homes
Sphygmomanometers
Sleep
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Ambulatory monitoring in the evaluation of blood pressure in patients with borderline hypertension and the role of the defense reflex. / Pickering, Thomas G.; Harshfield, Gregory A.; Kleinert, Hollis D.; Laragh, John H.

In: Clinical and experimental hypertension, Vol. A4, No. 4-5, 01.01.1982, p. 675-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{969a58b35074418a8c8b542db9daae5f,
title = "Ambulatory monitoring in the evaluation of blood pressure in patients with borderline hypertension and the role of the defense reflex",
abstract = "The differences between blood pressure (BP) readings taken in the clinic and during normal daily activities were assessed in two studies using a noninvasive ambulatory BP monitor (Avionics). In the first study 30 untreated hypertensive patients (17 with borderline pressures, average diastolic 95, and 13 established hypertensives, diastolics above 95) and 5 normotensive subjects had 30 readings taken in the physician's office and 30 while at home. Conventional sphygmomanometer BPs were also recorded in the office. In the borderline group home BPs were significantly lower than clinic BPs, whereas this difference was less marked for the established and normotensive group. In the second study BP was measured every 15 minutes for 24 hours in 25 normal subjects, 25 borderline and 25 established hypertensives, and readings categorized according to four recording situations: physician's office, work, at home, and sleep. BPs in all groups were highest at work and lowest asleep, and directional changes were similar. Both hypertensive groups showed higher BPs in the physician's office than at home, while normal subjects showed no difference. BPs recorded in the physician's office were good predictors of 24 hour average BP in normal and established hypertensive subjects, but not in the borderline group: in such patients 24 hour monitoring may be of particular value in evaluating the need for treatment.",
author = "Pickering, {Thomas G.} and Harshfield, {Gregory A.} and Kleinert, {Hollis D.} and Laragh, {John H.}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/10641968209061606",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "A4",
pages = "675--693",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Hypertension",
issn = "1064-1963",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ambulatory monitoring in the evaluation of blood pressure in patients with borderline hypertension and the role of the defense reflex

AU - Pickering, Thomas G.

AU - Harshfield, Gregory A.

AU - Kleinert, Hollis D.

AU - Laragh, John H.

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - The differences between blood pressure (BP) readings taken in the clinic and during normal daily activities were assessed in two studies using a noninvasive ambulatory BP monitor (Avionics). In the first study 30 untreated hypertensive patients (17 with borderline pressures, average diastolic 95, and 13 established hypertensives, diastolics above 95) and 5 normotensive subjects had 30 readings taken in the physician's office and 30 while at home. Conventional sphygmomanometer BPs were also recorded in the office. In the borderline group home BPs were significantly lower than clinic BPs, whereas this difference was less marked for the established and normotensive group. In the second study BP was measured every 15 minutes for 24 hours in 25 normal subjects, 25 borderline and 25 established hypertensives, and readings categorized according to four recording situations: physician's office, work, at home, and sleep. BPs in all groups were highest at work and lowest asleep, and directional changes were similar. Both hypertensive groups showed higher BPs in the physician's office than at home, while normal subjects showed no difference. BPs recorded in the physician's office were good predictors of 24 hour average BP in normal and established hypertensive subjects, but not in the borderline group: in such patients 24 hour monitoring may be of particular value in evaluating the need for treatment.

AB - The differences between blood pressure (BP) readings taken in the clinic and during normal daily activities were assessed in two studies using a noninvasive ambulatory BP monitor (Avionics). In the first study 30 untreated hypertensive patients (17 with borderline pressures, average diastolic 95, and 13 established hypertensives, diastolics above 95) and 5 normotensive subjects had 30 readings taken in the physician's office and 30 while at home. Conventional sphygmomanometer BPs were also recorded in the office. In the borderline group home BPs were significantly lower than clinic BPs, whereas this difference was less marked for the established and normotensive group. In the second study BP was measured every 15 minutes for 24 hours in 25 normal subjects, 25 borderline and 25 established hypertensives, and readings categorized according to four recording situations: physician's office, work, at home, and sleep. BPs in all groups were highest at work and lowest asleep, and directional changes were similar. Both hypertensive groups showed higher BPs in the physician's office than at home, while normal subjects showed no difference. BPs recorded in the physician's office were good predictors of 24 hour average BP in normal and established hypertensive subjects, but not in the borderline group: in such patients 24 hour monitoring may be of particular value in evaluating the need for treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019977320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019977320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/10641968209061606

DO - 10.3109/10641968209061606

M3 - Article

C2 - 7105434

AN - SCOPUS:0019977320

VL - A4

SP - 675

EP - 693

JO - Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

JF - Clinical and Experimental Hypertension

SN - 1064-1963

IS - 4-5

ER -