Analysis of 334 cases of pediatric esophageal foreign body removal suggests that traditional methods have similar outcomes whereas a magnetic tip orogastric tube appears to be an effective, efficient, and safe technique for disc battery removal

P. Benson Ham, Mark A. Ellis, Erika L. Simmerman, Nathaniel J. Walsh, Alykhan Lalani, Morgan Young, Robyn M Hatley, Charles G Howell, Charles Anthony Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Procedures and outcomes for pediatric esophageal foreign body removal were analyzed. Traditional methods of battery removal were compared with a magnetic tip orogastric tube (MtOGT). A single institution retrospective review from 1997 to 2014 of pediatric patients with esophageal foreign bodies was performed. Balloon extraction with fluoroscopy (performed in 173 patients with 91% success), flexible endoscopy (92% success in 102 patients), and rigid esophagoscopy (95% in 38 patients) had excellent success rates. A MtOGT had 100 per cent success in six disc battery patients, when other methods were more likely to fail, and was the fastest. Power analysis suggested 20 patients in the MtOGT group would be needed for significant savings in procedural time. Thirty-two per cent of all foreign bodies and 95 per cent of batteries had complications (P 5 0.002) because of the foreign body. Overall, 1.2 per cent had severe complications, whereas 10 per cent of batteries had severe complications (P 5 0.04). Each technique if applied appropriately can be a reasonable option for esophageal foreign body removal. Magnetic tip orogastric tubes used to extract ferromagnetic objects like disc batteries had the shortest procedure time and highest success rate although it was not statistically significant. Disc batteries require emergent removal and have a significant complication rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1152-1158
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume84
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Foreign Bodies
Pediatrics
Esophagoscopy
Fluoroscopy
Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Analysis of 334 cases of pediatric esophageal foreign body removal suggests that traditional methods have similar outcomes whereas a magnetic tip orogastric tube appears to be an effective, efficient, and safe technique for disc battery removal. / Ham, P. Benson; Ellis, Mark A.; Simmerman, Erika L.; Walsh, Nathaniel J.; Lalani, Alykhan; Young, Morgan; Hatley, Robyn M; Howell, Charles G; Hughes, Charles Anthony.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 84, No. 7, 01.07.2018, p. 1152-1158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fdbb006322654ccca0bdc2a162b4f878,
title = "Analysis of 334 cases of pediatric esophageal foreign body removal suggests that traditional methods have similar outcomes whereas a magnetic tip orogastric tube appears to be an effective, efficient, and safe technique for disc battery removal",
abstract = "Procedures and outcomes for pediatric esophageal foreign body removal were analyzed. Traditional methods of battery removal were compared with a magnetic tip orogastric tube (MtOGT). A single institution retrospective review from 1997 to 2014 of pediatric patients with esophageal foreign bodies was performed. Balloon extraction with fluoroscopy (performed in 173 patients with 91{\%} success), flexible endoscopy (92{\%} success in 102 patients), and rigid esophagoscopy (95{\%} in 38 patients) had excellent success rates. A MtOGT had 100 per cent success in six disc battery patients, when other methods were more likely to fail, and was the fastest. Power analysis suggested 20 patients in the MtOGT group would be needed for significant savings in procedural time. Thirty-two per cent of all foreign bodies and 95 per cent of batteries had complications (P 5 0.002) because of the foreign body. Overall, 1.2 per cent had severe complications, whereas 10 per cent of batteries had severe complications (P 5 0.04). Each technique if applied appropriately can be a reasonable option for esophageal foreign body removal. Magnetic tip orogastric tubes used to extract ferromagnetic objects like disc batteries had the shortest procedure time and highest success rate although it was not statistically significant. Disc batteries require emergent removal and have a significant complication rate.",
author = "Ham, {P. Benson} and Ellis, {Mark A.} and Simmerman, {Erika L.} and Walsh, {Nathaniel J.} and Alykhan Lalani and Morgan Young and Hatley, {Robyn M} and Howell, {Charles G} and Hughes, {Charles Anthony}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1152--1158",
journal = "Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of 334 cases of pediatric esophageal foreign body removal suggests that traditional methods have similar outcomes whereas a magnetic tip orogastric tube appears to be an effective, efficient, and safe technique for disc battery removal

AU - Ham, P. Benson

AU - Ellis, Mark A.

AU - Simmerman, Erika L.

AU - Walsh, Nathaniel J.

AU - Lalani, Alykhan

AU - Young, Morgan

AU - Hatley, Robyn M

AU - Howell, Charles G

AU - Hughes, Charles Anthony

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Procedures and outcomes for pediatric esophageal foreign body removal were analyzed. Traditional methods of battery removal were compared with a magnetic tip orogastric tube (MtOGT). A single institution retrospective review from 1997 to 2014 of pediatric patients with esophageal foreign bodies was performed. Balloon extraction with fluoroscopy (performed in 173 patients with 91% success), flexible endoscopy (92% success in 102 patients), and rigid esophagoscopy (95% in 38 patients) had excellent success rates. A MtOGT had 100 per cent success in six disc battery patients, when other methods were more likely to fail, and was the fastest. Power analysis suggested 20 patients in the MtOGT group would be needed for significant savings in procedural time. Thirty-two per cent of all foreign bodies and 95 per cent of batteries had complications (P 5 0.002) because of the foreign body. Overall, 1.2 per cent had severe complications, whereas 10 per cent of batteries had severe complications (P 5 0.04). Each technique if applied appropriately can be a reasonable option for esophageal foreign body removal. Magnetic tip orogastric tubes used to extract ferromagnetic objects like disc batteries had the shortest procedure time and highest success rate although it was not statistically significant. Disc batteries require emergent removal and have a significant complication rate.

AB - Procedures and outcomes for pediatric esophageal foreign body removal were analyzed. Traditional methods of battery removal were compared with a magnetic tip orogastric tube (MtOGT). A single institution retrospective review from 1997 to 2014 of pediatric patients with esophageal foreign bodies was performed. Balloon extraction with fluoroscopy (performed in 173 patients with 91% success), flexible endoscopy (92% success in 102 patients), and rigid esophagoscopy (95% in 38 patients) had excellent success rates. A MtOGT had 100 per cent success in six disc battery patients, when other methods were more likely to fail, and was the fastest. Power analysis suggested 20 patients in the MtOGT group would be needed for significant savings in procedural time. Thirty-two per cent of all foreign bodies and 95 per cent of batteries had complications (P 5 0.002) because of the foreign body. Overall, 1.2 per cent had severe complications, whereas 10 per cent of batteries had severe complications (P 5 0.04). Each technique if applied appropriately can be a reasonable option for esophageal foreign body removal. Magnetic tip orogastric tubes used to extract ferromagnetic objects like disc batteries had the shortest procedure time and highest success rate although it was not statistically significant. Disc batteries require emergent removal and have a significant complication rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050871704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050871704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 30064579

AN - SCOPUS:85050871704

VL - 84

SP - 1152

EP - 1158

JO - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 7

ER -