Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression?

Dean Seehusen, Laura Mae Baldwin, Guy P. Runkle, Gary Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the availability of screening tools for postpartum depression (PPD), there is a general consensus that the condition is underdiagnosed. This study was conducted to determine how frequently family physicians screen for PPD, what methods they use to screen, and what influences their screening frequency. Methods: A survey of members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians was conducted. Three hundred sixty-two (60.9%) mailed surveys were returned. The 298 physicians who saw postpartum women and children younger than 1 year of age were included in the study. Results: Of the study population, 70.2% always or often screened for PPD at postpartum gynecologic examinations, and 46% always or often screened mothers at well-child visits. Of those who screened, 30.6% reported using a validated screening tool. Of those, only 18% used a tool specifically designed to screen for PPD. Logistic regression modeling showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2], training in PPD during residency (OR = 8.1), training in PPD through medical literature (OR = 2.1), and agreement that postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening (OR = 1.9) were all significantly associated with more frequent screening at postpartum gynecologic visits. Agreement that screening takes too much effort was associated with less frequent screening (OR = 0.8). Conclusions: Although family physicians believe that PPD is serious, identifiable, and treatable; screening is not universal and use of screening tools designed for PPD is uncommon. Training in postpartum depression and female sex are the variables most strongly associated with frequent screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Practice
Volume18
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Postpartum Depression
Family Physicians
Odds Ratio
Postpartum Period
Sex Ratio
Internship and Residency
Consensus
Logistic Models
Mothers
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression? / Seehusen, Dean; Baldwin, Laura Mae; Runkle, Guy P.; Clark, Gary.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.03.2005, p. 104-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Seehusen, Dean ; Baldwin, Laura Mae ; Runkle, Guy P. ; Clark, Gary. / Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression?. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 2005 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 104-112.
@article{b852db34201e47608d42beffd6192683,
title = "Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression?",
abstract = "Purpose: Despite the availability of screening tools for postpartum depression (PPD), there is a general consensus that the condition is underdiagnosed. This study was conducted to determine how frequently family physicians screen for PPD, what methods they use to screen, and what influences their screening frequency. Methods: A survey of members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians was conducted. Three hundred sixty-two (60.9{\%}) mailed surveys were returned. The 298 physicians who saw postpartum women and children younger than 1 year of age were included in the study. Results: Of the study population, 70.2{\%} always or often screened for PPD at postpartum gynecologic examinations, and 46{\%} always or often screened mothers at well-child visits. Of those who screened, 30.6{\%} reported using a validated screening tool. Of those, only 18{\%} used a tool specifically designed to screen for PPD. Logistic regression modeling showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2], training in PPD during residency (OR = 8.1), training in PPD through medical literature (OR = 2.1), and agreement that postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening (OR = 1.9) were all significantly associated with more frequent screening at postpartum gynecologic visits. Agreement that screening takes too much effort was associated with less frequent screening (OR = 0.8). Conclusions: Although family physicians believe that PPD is serious, identifiable, and treatable; screening is not universal and use of screening tools designed for PPD is uncommon. Training in postpartum depression and female sex are the variables most strongly associated with frequent screening.",
author = "Dean Seehusen and Baldwin, {Laura Mae} and Runkle, {Guy P.} and Gary Clark",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "104--112",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression?

AU - Seehusen, Dean

AU - Baldwin, Laura Mae

AU - Runkle, Guy P.

AU - Clark, Gary

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - Purpose: Despite the availability of screening tools for postpartum depression (PPD), there is a general consensus that the condition is underdiagnosed. This study was conducted to determine how frequently family physicians screen for PPD, what methods they use to screen, and what influences their screening frequency. Methods: A survey of members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians was conducted. Three hundred sixty-two (60.9%) mailed surveys were returned. The 298 physicians who saw postpartum women and children younger than 1 year of age were included in the study. Results: Of the study population, 70.2% always or often screened for PPD at postpartum gynecologic examinations, and 46% always or often screened mothers at well-child visits. Of those who screened, 30.6% reported using a validated screening tool. Of those, only 18% used a tool specifically designed to screen for PPD. Logistic regression modeling showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2], training in PPD during residency (OR = 8.1), training in PPD through medical literature (OR = 2.1), and agreement that postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening (OR = 1.9) were all significantly associated with more frequent screening at postpartum gynecologic visits. Agreement that screening takes too much effort was associated with less frequent screening (OR = 0.8). Conclusions: Although family physicians believe that PPD is serious, identifiable, and treatable; screening is not universal and use of screening tools designed for PPD is uncommon. Training in postpartum depression and female sex are the variables most strongly associated with frequent screening.

AB - Purpose: Despite the availability of screening tools for postpartum depression (PPD), there is a general consensus that the condition is underdiagnosed. This study was conducted to determine how frequently family physicians screen for PPD, what methods they use to screen, and what influences their screening frequency. Methods: A survey of members of the Washington Academy of Family Physicians was conducted. Three hundred sixty-two (60.9%) mailed surveys were returned. The 298 physicians who saw postpartum women and children younger than 1 year of age were included in the study. Results: Of the study population, 70.2% always or often screened for PPD at postpartum gynecologic examinations, and 46% always or often screened mothers at well-child visits. Of those who screened, 30.6% reported using a validated screening tool. Of those, only 18% used a tool specifically designed to screen for PPD. Logistic regression modeling showed that female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2], training in PPD during residency (OR = 8.1), training in PPD through medical literature (OR = 2.1), and agreement that postpartum depression is common enough to warrant screening (OR = 1.9) were all significantly associated with more frequent screening at postpartum gynecologic visits. Agreement that screening takes too much effort was associated with less frequent screening (OR = 0.8). Conclusions: Although family physicians believe that PPD is serious, identifiable, and treatable; screening is not universal and use of screening tools designed for PPD is uncommon. Training in postpartum depression and female sex are the variables most strongly associated with frequent screening.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044436838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044436838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 18

SP - 104

EP - 112

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 2

ER -