Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?

John Rodway Mackert, Michael J. Wahl

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-610
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the California Dental Association
Volume32
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Dental Amalgam
Inlays
Tooth
Gold Alloys
Glass Ionomer Cements
Composite Resins
Ceramics
Esthetics
Object Attachment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? / Mackert, John Rodway; Wahl, Michael J.

In: Journal of the California Dental Association, Vol. 32, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 601-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{188321f503cf4b43b40b7cca64b58604,
title = "Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?",
abstract = "Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.",
author = "Mackert, {John Rodway} and Wahl, {Michael J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "601--610",
journal = "CDA journal California Dental Association",
issn = "1043-2256",
publisher = "California Dental Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?

AU - Mackert, John Rodway

AU - Wahl, Michael J.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.

AB - Amalgam has been the material of choice for restoring posterior teeth for more than 100 years. The past 25 years have witnessed significant advances in restorative materials themselves and in the bonding systems for retaining a restoration in the prepared tooth. As a result, there has been a shift toward resin composite materials during this same period because of concerns about the esthetics and biocompatibility of dental amalgam. In addition, other materials such as glass ionomer cements, ceramic inlays and onlays, and gold alloys have been used as alternatives to amalgam. This article will review recent studies on the longevity and biocompatibility of these alternatives to dental amalgam.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7944228333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7944228333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15468542

AN - SCOPUS:7944228333

VL - 32

SP - 601

EP - 610

JO - CDA journal California Dental Association

JF - CDA journal California Dental Association

SN - 1043-2256

IS - 7

ER -