Army family practice: Does our training meet our needs?

Bruce M LeClair, B. Wayne Blount, William F. Miser, David L. Maness, Wayne A. Schirner, George F. Weightman, Ronald Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To determine the perceived adequacy of residency training for current practice by Army family physicians; (2) to ascertain if differences exist by residency setting: medical center, medical activity, or civilian. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 334 family physicians in the Army in 1993. Training in various subject areas was rated as inadequate, adequate, or overly prepared. Results: More than 75% of respondents felt prepared in 76% of general medical subjects (GM) but in only 39% of family medicine subjects (FM). There were no practice management subjects in which more than 75% felt adequately prepared. There were no differences in perceptions of GM or FM training between military- and civilian-trained respondents. Conclusions: Army and civilian residencies prepare family physicians for the medical aspects of practice. Early training in management subjects could be enhanced. Civilian and Army programs could improve training in family medicine subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-604
Number of pages4
JournalMilitary medicine
Volume162
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1 1997

Fingerprint

Family Practice
Family Physicians
Internship and Residency
Medicine
Practice Management
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

LeClair, B. M., Wayne Blount, B., Miser, W. F., Maness, D. L., Schirner, W. A., Weightman, G. F., & Jones, R. (1997). Army family practice: Does our training meet our needs? Military medicine, 162(9), 601-604.

Army family practice : Does our training meet our needs? / LeClair, Bruce M; Wayne Blount, B.; Miser, William F.; Maness, David L.; Schirner, Wayne A.; Weightman, George F.; Jones, Ronald.

In: Military medicine, Vol. 162, No. 9, 01.09.1997, p. 601-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LeClair, BM, Wayne Blount, B, Miser, WF, Maness, DL, Schirner, WA, Weightman, GF & Jones, R 1997, 'Army family practice: Does our training meet our needs?', Military medicine, vol. 162, no. 9, pp. 601-604.
LeClair BM, Wayne Blount B, Miser WF, Maness DL, Schirner WA, Weightman GF et al. Army family practice: Does our training meet our needs? Military medicine. 1997 Sep 1;162(9):601-604.
LeClair, Bruce M ; Wayne Blount, B. ; Miser, William F. ; Maness, David L. ; Schirner, Wayne A. ; Weightman, George F. ; Jones, Ronald. / Army family practice : Does our training meet our needs?. In: Military medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 162, No. 9. pp. 601-604.
@article{8109558548f243e59368d3a87de6925e,
title = "Army family practice: Does our training meet our needs?",
abstract = "Objectives: (1) To determine the perceived adequacy of residency training for current practice by Army family physicians; (2) to ascertain if differences exist by residency setting: medical center, medical activity, or civilian. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 334 family physicians in the Army in 1993. Training in various subject areas was rated as inadequate, adequate, or overly prepared. Results: More than 75{\%} of respondents felt prepared in 76{\%} of general medical subjects (GM) but in only 39{\%} of family medicine subjects (FM). There were no practice management subjects in which more than 75{\%} felt adequately prepared. There were no differences in perceptions of GM or FM training between military- and civilian-trained respondents. Conclusions: Army and civilian residencies prepare family physicians for the medical aspects of practice. Early training in management subjects could be enhanced. Civilian and Army programs could improve training in family medicine subjects.",
author = "LeClair, {Bruce M} and {Wayne Blount}, B. and Miser, {William F.} and Maness, {David L.} and Schirner, {Wayne A.} and Weightman, {George F.} and Ronald Jones",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "601--604",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Army family practice

T2 - Does our training meet our needs?

AU - LeClair, Bruce M

AU - Wayne Blount, B.

AU - Miser, William F.

AU - Maness, David L.

AU - Schirner, Wayne A.

AU - Weightman, George F.

AU - Jones, Ronald

PY - 1997/9/1

Y1 - 1997/9/1

N2 - Objectives: (1) To determine the perceived adequacy of residency training for current practice by Army family physicians; (2) to ascertain if differences exist by residency setting: medical center, medical activity, or civilian. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 334 family physicians in the Army in 1993. Training in various subject areas was rated as inadequate, adequate, or overly prepared. Results: More than 75% of respondents felt prepared in 76% of general medical subjects (GM) but in only 39% of family medicine subjects (FM). There were no practice management subjects in which more than 75% felt adequately prepared. There were no differences in perceptions of GM or FM training between military- and civilian-trained respondents. Conclusions: Army and civilian residencies prepare family physicians for the medical aspects of practice. Early training in management subjects could be enhanced. Civilian and Army programs could improve training in family medicine subjects.

AB - Objectives: (1) To determine the perceived adequacy of residency training for current practice by Army family physicians; (2) to ascertain if differences exist by residency setting: medical center, medical activity, or civilian. Methods: Surveys were mailed to the 334 family physicians in the Army in 1993. Training in various subject areas was rated as inadequate, adequate, or overly prepared. Results: More than 75% of respondents felt prepared in 76% of general medical subjects (GM) but in only 39% of family medicine subjects (FM). There were no practice management subjects in which more than 75% felt adequately prepared. There were no differences in perceptions of GM or FM training between military- and civilian-trained respondents. Conclusions: Army and civilian residencies prepare family physicians for the medical aspects of practice. Early training in management subjects could be enhanced. Civilian and Army programs could improve training in family medicine subjects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842333331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842333331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9290294

AN - SCOPUS:1842333331

VL - 162

SP - 601

EP - 604

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

IS - 9

ER -