Bad news reporting on troubled IT projects: Reassessing the mediating role of responsibility in the basic whistleblowing model

Mark Keil, ChongWoo Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whistleblowing theory has been used in the information systems literature to help explain willingness to report bad news on troubled projects. According to whistleblowing theory, an individual first assesses the situation to determine if any action needs to be taken, then considers whether there is any personal responsibility to act, and this, in turn, shapes his/her choice of action. Information systems researchers have interpreted and used the basic whistleblowing model in a way that suggests that responsibility fully mediates the relationship between assessment and choice of action. While prior research has shown support for the basic whistleblowing model, the question of whether responsibility partially or fully mediates the relationship between the assessment and choice of action has not been tested empirically. This research provides theoretical justification for a partial mediation model. Using three different datasets, we provide empirical support for the partial mediation model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2305-2316
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Systems and Software
Volume83
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Information systems

Keywords

  • Bad news reporting
  • IT project management
  • Partial mediation
  • Whistleblowing model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Hardware and Architecture

Cite this

@article{1f64977b908d46ffa05d8389fdf29d3c,
title = "Bad news reporting on troubled IT projects: Reassessing the mediating role of responsibility in the basic whistleblowing model",
abstract = "Whistleblowing theory has been used in the information systems literature to help explain willingness to report bad news on troubled projects. According to whistleblowing theory, an individual first assesses the situation to determine if any action needs to be taken, then considers whether there is any personal responsibility to act, and this, in turn, shapes his/her choice of action. Information systems researchers have interpreted and used the basic whistleblowing model in a way that suggests that responsibility fully mediates the relationship between assessment and choice of action. While prior research has shown support for the basic whistleblowing model, the question of whether responsibility partially or fully mediates the relationship between the assessment and choice of action has not been tested empirically. This research provides theoretical justification for a partial mediation model. Using three different datasets, we provide empirical support for the partial mediation model.",
keywords = "Bad news reporting, IT project management, Partial mediation, Whistleblowing model",
author = "Mark Keil and ChongWoo Park",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "2305--2316",
journal = "Journal of Systems and Software",
issn = "0164-1212",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bad news reporting on troubled IT projects

T2 - Reassessing the mediating role of responsibility in the basic whistleblowing model

AU - Keil, Mark

AU - Park, ChongWoo

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Whistleblowing theory has been used in the information systems literature to help explain willingness to report bad news on troubled projects. According to whistleblowing theory, an individual first assesses the situation to determine if any action needs to be taken, then considers whether there is any personal responsibility to act, and this, in turn, shapes his/her choice of action. Information systems researchers have interpreted and used the basic whistleblowing model in a way that suggests that responsibility fully mediates the relationship between assessment and choice of action. While prior research has shown support for the basic whistleblowing model, the question of whether responsibility partially or fully mediates the relationship between the assessment and choice of action has not been tested empirically. This research provides theoretical justification for a partial mediation model. Using three different datasets, we provide empirical support for the partial mediation model.

AB - Whistleblowing theory has been used in the information systems literature to help explain willingness to report bad news on troubled projects. According to whistleblowing theory, an individual first assesses the situation to determine if any action needs to be taken, then considers whether there is any personal responsibility to act, and this, in turn, shapes his/her choice of action. Information systems researchers have interpreted and used the basic whistleblowing model in a way that suggests that responsibility fully mediates the relationship between assessment and choice of action. While prior research has shown support for the basic whistleblowing model, the question of whether responsibility partially or fully mediates the relationship between the assessment and choice of action has not been tested empirically. This research provides theoretical justification for a partial mediation model. Using three different datasets, we provide empirical support for the partial mediation model.

KW - Bad news reporting

KW - IT project management

KW - Partial mediation

KW - Whistleblowing model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957338100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957338100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957338100

VL - 83

SP - 2305

EP - 2316

JO - Journal of Systems and Software

JF - Journal of Systems and Software

SN - 0164-1212

IS - 11

ER -