Basic science right, not basic science lite

Medical education at a crossroad

Ruth Marie E. Fincher, Paul M Wallach, Scott Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This perspective is a counterpoint to Dr. Brass' article, Basic biomedical sciences and the future of medical education: implications for internal medicine. The authors review development of the US medical education system as an introduction to a discussion of Dr. Brass' perspectives. The authors agree that sound scientific foundations and skill in critical thinking are important and that effective educational strategies to improve foundational science education should be implemented. Unfortunately, many students do not perceive the relevance of basic science education to clinical practice. The authors cite areas of disagreement. They believe it is unlikely that the importance of basic sciences will be diminished by contemporary directions in medical education and planned modifications of USMLE. Graduates' diminished interest in internal medicine is unlikely from changes in basic science education. Thoughtful changes in education provide the opportunity to improve understanding of fundamental sciences, the process of scientific inquiry, and translation of that knowledge to clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1255-1258
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume24
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Education
Internal Medicine
Translational Medical Research
Students

Keywords

  • Clinical care
  • Educational models
  • Medical education
  • Research
  • Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Basic science right, not basic science lite : Medical education at a crossroad. / Fincher, Ruth Marie E.; Wallach, Paul M; Richardson, Scott.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 11, 01.11.2009, p. 1255-1258.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Fincher, Ruth Marie E. ; Wallach, Paul M ; Richardson, Scott. / Basic science right, not basic science lite : Medical education at a crossroad. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 11. pp. 1255-1258.
@article{43b3549a64f8476ab3aff8727ca81a4a,
title = "Basic science right, not basic science lite: Medical education at a crossroad",
abstract = "This perspective is a counterpoint to Dr. Brass' article, Basic biomedical sciences and the future of medical education: implications for internal medicine. The authors review development of the US medical education system as an introduction to a discussion of Dr. Brass' perspectives. The authors agree that sound scientific foundations and skill in critical thinking are important and that effective educational strategies to improve foundational science education should be implemented. Unfortunately, many students do not perceive the relevance of basic science education to clinical practice. The authors cite areas of disagreement. They believe it is unlikely that the importance of basic sciences will be diminished by contemporary directions in medical education and planned modifications of USMLE. Graduates' diminished interest in internal medicine is unlikely from changes in basic science education. Thoughtful changes in education provide the opportunity to improve understanding of fundamental sciences, the process of scientific inquiry, and translation of that knowledge to clinical practice.",
keywords = "Clinical care, Educational models, Medical education, Research, Teaching",
author = "Fincher, {Ruth Marie E.} and Wallach, {Paul M} and Scott Richardson",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-009-1109-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1255--1258",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Basic science right, not basic science lite

T2 - Medical education at a crossroad

AU - Fincher, Ruth Marie E.

AU - Wallach, Paul M

AU - Richardson, Scott

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - This perspective is a counterpoint to Dr. Brass' article, Basic biomedical sciences and the future of medical education: implications for internal medicine. The authors review development of the US medical education system as an introduction to a discussion of Dr. Brass' perspectives. The authors agree that sound scientific foundations and skill in critical thinking are important and that effective educational strategies to improve foundational science education should be implemented. Unfortunately, many students do not perceive the relevance of basic science education to clinical practice. The authors cite areas of disagreement. They believe it is unlikely that the importance of basic sciences will be diminished by contemporary directions in medical education and planned modifications of USMLE. Graduates' diminished interest in internal medicine is unlikely from changes in basic science education. Thoughtful changes in education provide the opportunity to improve understanding of fundamental sciences, the process of scientific inquiry, and translation of that knowledge to clinical practice.

AB - This perspective is a counterpoint to Dr. Brass' article, Basic biomedical sciences and the future of medical education: implications for internal medicine. The authors review development of the US medical education system as an introduction to a discussion of Dr. Brass' perspectives. The authors agree that sound scientific foundations and skill in critical thinking are important and that effective educational strategies to improve foundational science education should be implemented. Unfortunately, many students do not perceive the relevance of basic science education to clinical practice. The authors cite areas of disagreement. They believe it is unlikely that the importance of basic sciences will be diminished by contemporary directions in medical education and planned modifications of USMLE. Graduates' diminished interest in internal medicine is unlikely from changes in basic science education. Thoughtful changes in education provide the opportunity to improve understanding of fundamental sciences, the process of scientific inquiry, and translation of that knowledge to clinical practice.

KW - Clinical care

KW - Educational models

KW - Medical education

KW - Research

KW - Teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449527807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449527807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-009-1109-3

DO - 10.1007/s11606-009-1109-3

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 1255

EP - 1258

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 11

ER -