Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites

Mohammed Qahash, Cristiano Susin, Giuseppe Polimeni, Jan Hall, Ulf M E Wikesjö

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is common belief that immediate implant placement into extraction sites may act to preserve the alveolar process. The objective of this study was to evaluate healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites in relation to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Bilateral, critical-size, supraalveolar, peri-implant defects were created in 12 male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs following surgical horizontal cut-down of the alveolar ridge. Each jaw quadrant received three 10-mm titanium implants placed 5 mm into extraction sites of the third and fourth premolar teeth leaving 5 mm in a supraalveolar position. The mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced, adapted, and sutured for primary intention healing. Bone fluorescent markers were administered at weeks 3 and 4 postsurgery, and pre-euthanasia. Incandescent, polarized, and fluorescent light microscopies were used to assess the width of the buccal wall of the alveolar ridge and local bone remodeling over the 8-week healing interval. There was a significant association between the width of the buccal alveolar ridge and extent of bone resorption evaluated by incandescent and fluorescent light microscopy. A non-linear association was observed between the buccal ridge width and resorption of the alveolar ridge. A 2-mm threshold was established to account for this non-linearity. The strength of this association was two times greater in specimens with a buccal ridge width <2 mm compared with a wider ridge (β=1.62 vs. 0.80) observed by fluorescent light microscopy. Accordingly, mean buccal resorption was significantly greater when the ridge width was <2 mm. Fluorescent light microscopy consistently showed greater buccal resorption compared with incandescent light microscopy (P<0.05). Agreement between the examination techniques was low (concordance correlation coefficient=0.49), especially for higher values of buccal resorption. When implants are placed into extraction sites, proximity to the buccal alveolar crest appears a major consideration. The observations herein suggest that the width of the buccal alveolar ridge should be at least 2 mm to maintain the alveolar bone level. These observations likely have general implications for implant placement using most surgical protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-172
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Cheek
Alveolar Process
Bone and Bones
Microscopy
Light
Polarization Microscopy
Newfoundland and Labrador
Euthanasia
Bone Remodeling
Bicuspid
Bone Resorption
Titanium
Jaw
Tooth
Dogs

Keywords

  • Animal model
  • Bone resorption
  • Extraction sites
  • Histology
  • Oral implants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Qahash, M., Susin, C., Polimeni, G., Hall, J., & Wikesjö, U. M. E. (2008). Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(2), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x

Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. / Qahash, Mohammed; Susin, Cristiano; Polimeni, Giuseppe; Hall, Jan; Wikesjö, Ulf M E.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.02.2008, p. 166-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Qahash, M, Susin, C, Polimeni, G, Hall, J & Wikesjö, UME 2008, 'Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites', Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x
Qahash, Mohammed ; Susin, Cristiano ; Polimeni, Giuseppe ; Hall, Jan ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E. / Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2008 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 166-172.
@article{66be674504d447d1949e78e5d968e135,
title = "Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites",
abstract = "It is common belief that immediate implant placement into extraction sites may act to preserve the alveolar process. The objective of this study was to evaluate healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites in relation to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Bilateral, critical-size, supraalveolar, peri-implant defects were created in 12 male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs following surgical horizontal cut-down of the alveolar ridge. Each jaw quadrant received three 10-mm titanium implants placed 5 mm into extraction sites of the third and fourth premolar teeth leaving 5 mm in a supraalveolar position. The mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced, adapted, and sutured for primary intention healing. Bone fluorescent markers were administered at weeks 3 and 4 postsurgery, and pre-euthanasia. Incandescent, polarized, and fluorescent light microscopies were used to assess the width of the buccal wall of the alveolar ridge and local bone remodeling over the 8-week healing interval. There was a significant association between the width of the buccal alveolar ridge and extent of bone resorption evaluated by incandescent and fluorescent light microscopy. A non-linear association was observed between the buccal ridge width and resorption of the alveolar ridge. A 2-mm threshold was established to account for this non-linearity. The strength of this association was two times greater in specimens with a buccal ridge width <2 mm compared with a wider ridge (β=1.62 vs. 0.80) observed by fluorescent light microscopy. Accordingly, mean buccal resorption was significantly greater when the ridge width was <2 mm. Fluorescent light microscopy consistently showed greater buccal resorption compared with incandescent light microscopy (P<0.05). Agreement between the examination techniques was low (concordance correlation coefficient=0.49), especially for higher values of buccal resorption. When implants are placed into extraction sites, proximity to the buccal alveolar crest appears a major consideration. The observations herein suggest that the width of the buccal alveolar ridge should be at least 2 mm to maintain the alveolar bone level. These observations likely have general implications for implant placement using most surgical protocols.",
keywords = "Animal model, Bone resorption, Extraction sites, Histology, Oral implants",
author = "Mohammed Qahash and Cristiano Susin and Giuseppe Polimeni and Jan Hall and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "166--172",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites

AU - Qahash, Mohammed

AU - Susin, Cristiano

AU - Polimeni, Giuseppe

AU - Hall, Jan

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - It is common belief that immediate implant placement into extraction sites may act to preserve the alveolar process. The objective of this study was to evaluate healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites in relation to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Bilateral, critical-size, supraalveolar, peri-implant defects were created in 12 male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs following surgical horizontal cut-down of the alveolar ridge. Each jaw quadrant received three 10-mm titanium implants placed 5 mm into extraction sites of the third and fourth premolar teeth leaving 5 mm in a supraalveolar position. The mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced, adapted, and sutured for primary intention healing. Bone fluorescent markers were administered at weeks 3 and 4 postsurgery, and pre-euthanasia. Incandescent, polarized, and fluorescent light microscopies were used to assess the width of the buccal wall of the alveolar ridge and local bone remodeling over the 8-week healing interval. There was a significant association between the width of the buccal alveolar ridge and extent of bone resorption evaluated by incandescent and fluorescent light microscopy. A non-linear association was observed between the buccal ridge width and resorption of the alveolar ridge. A 2-mm threshold was established to account for this non-linearity. The strength of this association was two times greater in specimens with a buccal ridge width <2 mm compared with a wider ridge (β=1.62 vs. 0.80) observed by fluorescent light microscopy. Accordingly, mean buccal resorption was significantly greater when the ridge width was <2 mm. Fluorescent light microscopy consistently showed greater buccal resorption compared with incandescent light microscopy (P<0.05). Agreement between the examination techniques was low (concordance correlation coefficient=0.49), especially for higher values of buccal resorption. When implants are placed into extraction sites, proximity to the buccal alveolar crest appears a major consideration. The observations herein suggest that the width of the buccal alveolar ridge should be at least 2 mm to maintain the alveolar bone level. These observations likely have general implications for implant placement using most surgical protocols.

AB - It is common belief that immediate implant placement into extraction sites may act to preserve the alveolar process. The objective of this study was to evaluate healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites in relation to the dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Bilateral, critical-size, supraalveolar, peri-implant defects were created in 12 male Hound Labrador mongrel dogs following surgical horizontal cut-down of the alveolar ridge. Each jaw quadrant received three 10-mm titanium implants placed 5 mm into extraction sites of the third and fourth premolar teeth leaving 5 mm in a supraalveolar position. The mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced, adapted, and sutured for primary intention healing. Bone fluorescent markers were administered at weeks 3 and 4 postsurgery, and pre-euthanasia. Incandescent, polarized, and fluorescent light microscopies were used to assess the width of the buccal wall of the alveolar ridge and local bone remodeling over the 8-week healing interval. There was a significant association between the width of the buccal alveolar ridge and extent of bone resorption evaluated by incandescent and fluorescent light microscopy. A non-linear association was observed between the buccal ridge width and resorption of the alveolar ridge. A 2-mm threshold was established to account for this non-linearity. The strength of this association was two times greater in specimens with a buccal ridge width <2 mm compared with a wider ridge (β=1.62 vs. 0.80) observed by fluorescent light microscopy. Accordingly, mean buccal resorption was significantly greater when the ridge width was <2 mm. Fluorescent light microscopy consistently showed greater buccal resorption compared with incandescent light microscopy (P<0.05). Agreement between the examination techniques was low (concordance correlation coefficient=0.49), especially for higher values of buccal resorption. When implants are placed into extraction sites, proximity to the buccal alveolar crest appears a major consideration. The observations herein suggest that the width of the buccal alveolar ridge should be at least 2 mm to maintain the alveolar bone level. These observations likely have general implications for implant placement using most surgical protocols.

KW - Animal model

KW - Bone resorption

KW - Extraction sites

KW - Histology

KW - Oral implants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849030967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849030967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18039337

AN - SCOPUS:37849030967

VL - 19

SP - 166

EP - 172

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 2

ER -