Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.

Michelle Butina, Lester G Pretlow, Barbara Sawyer, Frank J. Scarano, Joan Polancic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-105
Number of pages6
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Butina, M., Pretlow, L. G., Sawyer, B., Scarano, F. J., & Polancic, J. (2013). Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting. Unknown Journal, 26(2), 100-105.