Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.

Michelle Butina, Lester G Pretlow, Barbara Sawyer, Frank J. Scarano, Joan Polancic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-105
Number of pages6
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume26
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Laboratory Science
Clinical laboratories
Advisory Committees
Research
Posters
Electronic mail
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Butina, M., Pretlow, L. G., Sawyer, B., Scarano, F. J., & Polancic, J. (2013). Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting. Unknown Journal, 26(2), 100-105.

Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting. / Butina, Michelle; Pretlow, Lester G; Sawyer, Barbara; Scarano, Frank J.; Polancic, Joan.

In: Unknown Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 100-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butina, M, Pretlow, LG, Sawyer, B, Scarano, FJ & Polancic, J 2013, 'Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.', Unknown Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 100-105.
Butina M, Pretlow LG, Sawyer B, Scarano FJ, Polancic J. Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting. Unknown Journal. 2013 Jan 1;26(2):100-105.
Butina, Michelle ; Pretlow, Lester G ; Sawyer, Barbara ; Scarano, Frank J. ; Polancic, Joan. / Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting. In: Unknown Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 100-105.
@article{fc0052a0d8584a34b5eaed4312efb4ed,
title = "Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.",
abstract = "The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.",
author = "Michelle Butina and Pretlow, {Lester G} and Barbara Sawyer and Scarano, {Frank J.} and Joan Polancic",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "100--105",
journal = "Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.

AU - Butina, Michelle

AU - Pretlow, Lester G

AU - Sawyer, Barbara

AU - Scarano, Frank J.

AU - Polancic, Joan

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.

AB - The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879828036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879828036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 100

EP - 105

JO - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 2

ER -