Collaboration vs. individualism: What is better for the rising academic?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, "What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career-collaboration or individualism?" Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100
JournalQualitative Report
Volume18
Issue number50
StatePublished - Dec 16 2013

Fingerprint

individualism
academic career
Research
productivity
career
narrative
methodology

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Individual achievement
  • Layered narrative
  • Promotion and tenure
  • Research and scholarship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education

Cite this

Collaboration vs. individualism : What is better for the rising academic? / Kemp, Andrew T.

In: Qualitative Report, Vol. 18, No. 50, 100, 16.12.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4f41d24b42442deaa1e46926f4a3818,
title = "Collaboration vs. individualism: What is better for the rising academic?",
abstract = "In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, {"}What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career-collaboration or individualism?{"} Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Individual achievement, Layered narrative, Promotion and tenure, Research and scholarship",
author = "Kemp, {Andrew T}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Qualitative Report",
issn = "1052-0147",
publisher = "Nova Southeastern University",
number = "50",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collaboration vs. individualism

T2 - What is better for the rising academic?

AU - Kemp, Andrew T

PY - 2013/12/16

Y1 - 2013/12/16

N2 - In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, "What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career-collaboration or individualism?" Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.

AB - In academia, scholarship and research productivity is the lifeblood of success. The question is, "What is the best way to be productive and more forward in a academic career-collaboration or individualism?" Obviously, the final choice is personal. However, for the purpose of this paper, the two sides will be discussed regarding the strengths and weaknesses of each avenue. Recommendations regarding the viability of collaboration and competition will be discussed in relation to personal attributes, career goals, and rank. In addition, a new methodology, tentatively called Layered Narrative, will be piloted with this project.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Individual achievement

KW - Layered narrative

KW - Promotion and tenure

KW - Research and scholarship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890506474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890506474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84890506474

VL - 18

JO - Qualitative Report

JF - Qualitative Report

SN - 1052-0147

IS - 50

M1 - 100

ER -