Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers

A review

Daniel Cason Hannah, Jason S. Scibek

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The shoulder complex presents unique challenges for measuring motion as the scapula, unlike any other bony segment in the body, glides and rotates underneath layers of soft tissue and skin. The ability for clinicians and researchers to collect meaningful kinematic data is dependent on the reliability and validity of the instrumentation utilized. The aim of this study was to review the relevant literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of electromagnetic tracking systems (ETS) and digital inclinometers for assessing shoulder complex motion. Advances in technology have led to the development of biomechanical instrumentation, like ETS, that allow for the collection of three-dimensional kinematic data. The existing evidence has demonstrated that ETS are reliable and valid instruments for collecting static and dynamic kinematic data of the shoulder complex. Similarly, digital inclinometers have become increasingly popular among clinicians due to their cost effectiveness and practical use in the clinical setting. The existing evidence supports the use of digital inclinometers for the collection of shoulder complex kinematics as these instruments have been demonstrated to yield acceptable reliability and validity. While digital inclinometers pose a disadvantage to ETS regarding accuracy, precision, and are limited to two-dimensional and static measurements, this instrument provides clinically meaningful data that allow clinicians and researchers the ability to measure, monitor, and compare shoulder complex kinematics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)783-794
Number of pages12
JournalWorld Journal of Orthopaedics
Volume6
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Electromagnetic Phenomena
Biomechanical Phenomena
Reproducibility of Results
Research Personnel
Scapula
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Technology
Skin

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Glenohumeral
  • Kinematics
  • Reliability
  • Scapulothoracic
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers : A review. / Hannah, Daniel Cason; Scibek, Jason S.

In: World Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 6, No. 10, 01.01.2015, p. 783-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{24e87cca04ba42c29a324f8615fb2056,
title = "Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers: A review",
abstract = "The shoulder complex presents unique challenges for measuring motion as the scapula, unlike any other bony segment in the body, glides and rotates underneath layers of soft tissue and skin. The ability for clinicians and researchers to collect meaningful kinematic data is dependent on the reliability and validity of the instrumentation utilized. The aim of this study was to review the relevant literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of electromagnetic tracking systems (ETS) and digital inclinometers for assessing shoulder complex motion. Advances in technology have led to the development of biomechanical instrumentation, like ETS, that allow for the collection of three-dimensional kinematic data. The existing evidence has demonstrated that ETS are reliable and valid instruments for collecting static and dynamic kinematic data of the shoulder complex. Similarly, digital inclinometers have become increasingly popular among clinicians due to their cost effectiveness and practical use in the clinical setting. The existing evidence supports the use of digital inclinometers for the collection of shoulder complex kinematics as these instruments have been demonstrated to yield acceptable reliability and validity. While digital inclinometers pose a disadvantage to ETS regarding accuracy, precision, and are limited to two-dimensional and static measurements, this instrument provides clinically meaningful data that allow clinicians and researchers the ability to measure, monitor, and compare shoulder complex kinematics.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Glenohumeral, Kinematics, Reliability, Scapulothoracic, Validity",
author = "Hannah, {Daniel Cason} and Scibek, {Jason S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.783",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "783--794",
journal = "World Journal of Orthopaedics",
issn = "2218-5836",
publisher = "di xue qian yuan bian ji bu",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers

T2 - A review

AU - Hannah, Daniel Cason

AU - Scibek, Jason S.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The shoulder complex presents unique challenges for measuring motion as the scapula, unlike any other bony segment in the body, glides and rotates underneath layers of soft tissue and skin. The ability for clinicians and researchers to collect meaningful kinematic data is dependent on the reliability and validity of the instrumentation utilized. The aim of this study was to review the relevant literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of electromagnetic tracking systems (ETS) and digital inclinometers for assessing shoulder complex motion. Advances in technology have led to the development of biomechanical instrumentation, like ETS, that allow for the collection of three-dimensional kinematic data. The existing evidence has demonstrated that ETS are reliable and valid instruments for collecting static and dynamic kinematic data of the shoulder complex. Similarly, digital inclinometers have become increasingly popular among clinicians due to their cost effectiveness and practical use in the clinical setting. The existing evidence supports the use of digital inclinometers for the collection of shoulder complex kinematics as these instruments have been demonstrated to yield acceptable reliability and validity. While digital inclinometers pose a disadvantage to ETS regarding accuracy, precision, and are limited to two-dimensional and static measurements, this instrument provides clinically meaningful data that allow clinicians and researchers the ability to measure, monitor, and compare shoulder complex kinematics.

AB - The shoulder complex presents unique challenges for measuring motion as the scapula, unlike any other bony segment in the body, glides and rotates underneath layers of soft tissue and skin. The ability for clinicians and researchers to collect meaningful kinematic data is dependent on the reliability and validity of the instrumentation utilized. The aim of this study was to review the relevant literature pertaining to the reliability and validity of electromagnetic tracking systems (ETS) and digital inclinometers for assessing shoulder complex motion. Advances in technology have led to the development of biomechanical instrumentation, like ETS, that allow for the collection of three-dimensional kinematic data. The existing evidence has demonstrated that ETS are reliable and valid instruments for collecting static and dynamic kinematic data of the shoulder complex. Similarly, digital inclinometers have become increasingly popular among clinicians due to their cost effectiveness and practical use in the clinical setting. The existing evidence supports the use of digital inclinometers for the collection of shoulder complex kinematics as these instruments have been demonstrated to yield acceptable reliability and validity. While digital inclinometers pose a disadvantage to ETS regarding accuracy, precision, and are limited to two-dimensional and static measurements, this instrument provides clinically meaningful data that allow clinicians and researchers the ability to measure, monitor, and compare shoulder complex kinematics.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Glenohumeral

KW - Kinematics

KW - Reliability

KW - Scapulothoracic

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947706340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947706340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.783

DO - 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.783

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

SP - 783

EP - 794

JO - World Journal of Orthopaedics

JF - World Journal of Orthopaedics

SN - 2218-5836

IS - 10

ER -