Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines

David Eibling, Marvin Fried, Andrew Blitzer, Gregory N Postma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) help guide busy practitioners in clinical decision making. CPGs are evidence-based in that recommendations are based on available knowledge derived from published clinical trials. The challenges presented by the tasks of finding, assessing, interpreting, and assembling the information in these reports are herculean. Missing or imperfect evidence may lead to the publication of suboptimal guidelines, even when the other components of the development process have been flawlessly performed. This commentary highlights the requirement that expert opinion must be explicitly recognized by CPG authoring groups when the published evidence is missing or inadequate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-357
Number of pages3
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Evidence-Based Practice
Publications
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • clinical practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines. / Eibling, David; Fried, Marvin; Blitzer, Andrew; Postma, Gregory N.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 124, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 355-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eibling, David ; Fried, Marvin ; Blitzer, Andrew ; Postma, Gregory N. / Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines. In: Laryngoscope. 2014 ; Vol. 124, No. 2. pp. 355-357.
@article{5bf37c2f52aa43e294b655b8f61594e3,
title = "Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines",
abstract = "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) help guide busy practitioners in clinical decision making. CPGs are evidence-based in that recommendations are based on available knowledge derived from published clinical trials. The challenges presented by the tasks of finding, assessing, interpreting, and assembling the information in these reports are herculean. Missing or imperfect evidence may lead to the publication of suboptimal guidelines, even when the other components of the development process have been flawlessly performed. This commentary highlights the requirement that expert opinion must be explicitly recognized by CPG authoring groups when the published evidence is missing or inadequate.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines",
author = "David Eibling and Marvin Fried and Andrew Blitzer and Postma, {Gregory N}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24175",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "355--357",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines

AU - Eibling, David

AU - Fried, Marvin

AU - Blitzer, Andrew

AU - Postma, Gregory N

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) help guide busy practitioners in clinical decision making. CPGs are evidence-based in that recommendations are based on available knowledge derived from published clinical trials. The challenges presented by the tasks of finding, assessing, interpreting, and assembling the information in these reports are herculean. Missing or imperfect evidence may lead to the publication of suboptimal guidelines, even when the other components of the development process have been flawlessly performed. This commentary highlights the requirement that expert opinion must be explicitly recognized by CPG authoring groups when the published evidence is missing or inadequate.

AB - Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) help guide busy practitioners in clinical decision making. CPGs are evidence-based in that recommendations are based on available knowledge derived from published clinical trials. The challenges presented by the tasks of finding, assessing, interpreting, and assembling the information in these reports are herculean. Missing or imperfect evidence may lead to the publication of suboptimal guidelines, even when the other components of the development process have been flawlessly performed. This commentary highlights the requirement that expert opinion must be explicitly recognized by CPG authoring groups when the published evidence is missing or inadequate.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - clinical practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892919653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892919653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24175

DO - 10.1002/lary.24175

M3 - Article

C2 - 24151042

AN - SCOPUS:84892919653

VL - 124

SP - 355

EP - 357

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 2

ER -