Constructional Praxis performance of Japanese and American, normal and brain-damaged patients

Gregory P. Lee, Sumiko Sasanuma, Kerry de S. Hamsher, Arthur L. Benton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have suggested population differences between Japanese and Americans concerning various cognitive functions. Transcultural differences in spatial reasoning, language, and dominance for emotional expression raise important questions concerning current conceptions of hemispheric cerebral dominance for cognitive functioning. If cultural differences in cognition exist, learning may play a greater role in determining laleralizalion of cognitive functions than is presently accepted. To investigate these issues, we initiated two collaborative studies comparing Japanese with American normals and brain-damaged patients on the Three-Dimensional Constructional Praxis Test. In normal subjects, there were no significant differences between the two cultures in the distribution of visuocon-structive ability. In patients with brain damage, the effects of unilateral brain lesions and their neuropsychological consequences on visuoconstructive ability were similar in both cultures. Thus, there are no apparent differences between the Japanese and American peoples in visuoconstructive abilities, or in the underlying cerebral organization of skills required to execute these functions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume6
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Asian Americans
Cognition
Brain
Cerebral Dominance
Language
Learning
Organizations
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Constructional Praxis performance of Japanese and American, normal and brain-damaged patients. / Lee, Gregory P.; Sasanuma, Sumiko; Hamsher, Kerry de S.; Benton, Arthur L.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 6, No. 1-2, 01.01.1991, p. 15-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Gregory P. ; Sasanuma, Sumiko ; Hamsher, Kerry de S. ; Benton, Arthur L. / Constructional Praxis performance of Japanese and American, normal and brain-damaged patients. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 1991 ; Vol. 6, No. 1-2. pp. 15-25.
@article{6eeeb801d9c24b9297a5e9ff25cff211,
title = "Constructional Praxis performance of Japanese and American, normal and brain-damaged patients",
abstract = "Numerous studies have suggested population differences between Japanese and Americans concerning various cognitive functions. Transcultural differences in spatial reasoning, language, and dominance for emotional expression raise important questions concerning current conceptions of hemispheric cerebral dominance for cognitive functioning. If cultural differences in cognition exist, learning may play a greater role in determining laleralizalion of cognitive functions than is presently accepted. To investigate these issues, we initiated two collaborative studies comparing Japanese with American normals and brain-damaged patients on the Three-Dimensional Constructional Praxis Test. In normal subjects, there were no significant differences between the two cultures in the distribution of visuocon-structive ability. In patients with brain damage, the effects of unilateral brain lesions and their neuropsychological consequences on visuoconstructive ability were similar in both cultures. Thus, there are no apparent differences between the Japanese and American peoples in visuoconstructive abilities, or in the underlying cerebral organization of skills required to execute these functions.",
author = "Lee, {Gregory P.} and Sumiko Sasanuma and Hamsher, {Kerry de S.} and Benton, {Arthur L.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0887-6177(91)90018-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "15--25",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "0887-6177",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructional Praxis performance of Japanese and American, normal and brain-damaged patients

AU - Lee, Gregory P.

AU - Sasanuma, Sumiko

AU - Hamsher, Kerry de S.

AU - Benton, Arthur L.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Numerous studies have suggested population differences between Japanese and Americans concerning various cognitive functions. Transcultural differences in spatial reasoning, language, and dominance for emotional expression raise important questions concerning current conceptions of hemispheric cerebral dominance for cognitive functioning. If cultural differences in cognition exist, learning may play a greater role in determining laleralizalion of cognitive functions than is presently accepted. To investigate these issues, we initiated two collaborative studies comparing Japanese with American normals and brain-damaged patients on the Three-Dimensional Constructional Praxis Test. In normal subjects, there were no significant differences between the two cultures in the distribution of visuocon-structive ability. In patients with brain damage, the effects of unilateral brain lesions and their neuropsychological consequences on visuoconstructive ability were similar in both cultures. Thus, there are no apparent differences between the Japanese and American peoples in visuoconstructive abilities, or in the underlying cerebral organization of skills required to execute these functions.

AB - Numerous studies have suggested population differences between Japanese and Americans concerning various cognitive functions. Transcultural differences in spatial reasoning, language, and dominance for emotional expression raise important questions concerning current conceptions of hemispheric cerebral dominance for cognitive functioning. If cultural differences in cognition exist, learning may play a greater role in determining laleralizalion of cognitive functions than is presently accepted. To investigate these issues, we initiated two collaborative studies comparing Japanese with American normals and brain-damaged patients on the Three-Dimensional Constructional Praxis Test. In normal subjects, there were no significant differences between the two cultures in the distribution of visuocon-structive ability. In patients with brain damage, the effects of unilateral brain lesions and their neuropsychological consequences on visuoconstructive ability were similar in both cultures. Thus, there are no apparent differences between the Japanese and American peoples in visuoconstructive abilities, or in the underlying cerebral organization of skills required to execute these functions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025772052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025772052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0887-6177(91)90018-5

DO - 10.1016/0887-6177(91)90018-5

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 15

EP - 25

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 0887-6177

IS - 1-2

ER -