Consumer trust in Google's top developers' apps: An exploratory study

Mark Alan Harris, Amita G. Chin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate Google's top developers' apps with trust badges to see if they warrant an additional level of trust and confidence from consumers, as stated by Google. Design/methodology/approach - Risky app permissions and in-app purchases (IAP) from Google's top developers and traditional developers were investigated in several Google Play top app categories, including Editor's Choice apps. Analysis was performed between categories and developer types. Findings - Overall, Google's top developers' apps request more risky permissions and IAP than do traditional developers. Other results indicate that free apps are more dangerous than paid apps and star ratings do not signify safe apps. Research limitations/implications - Because of a limited number of Google's top developers and Editor's Choice apps, conclusions are drawn from a small sample of apps and not the entire market. Practical implications - Google's top developers' apps are suited well for increasing revenue for Google and developers at the consumer's expense. Consumers should be wary of top developer trust badges. Social implications - As the lure for "top free" and "top developer" software is strong among consumers, this research contributes to societal welfare in that it makes consumers aware that Google top developer app trust badges and free apps are more dangerous than traditional developer and paid apps, as they request risky permissions at a much higher frequency. Therefore, consumers should be very careful when downloading apps that are advertised as "top free" or "top developer". Originality/value - Google's top developers' apps and Editors' Choice apps have not been investigated from the perspective of permissions and IAP before.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)474-495
Number of pages22
JournalInformation and Computer Security
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Application programs
Google
Exploratory study
Developer
Consumer trust

Keywords

  • Android
  • Computer privacy
  • Google top developers
  • IAP
  • Mobile device security
  • Permissions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Consumer trust in Google's top developers' apps : An exploratory study. / Harris, Mark Alan; Chin, Amita G.

In: Information and Computer Security, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.01.2016, p. 474-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{202ce1b42e194e129000b182e07d46ad,
title = "Consumer trust in Google's top developers' apps: An exploratory study",
abstract = "Purpose - This paper aims to investigate Google's top developers' apps with trust badges to see if they warrant an additional level of trust and confidence from consumers, as stated by Google. Design/methodology/approach - Risky app permissions and in-app purchases (IAP) from Google's top developers and traditional developers were investigated in several Google Play top app categories, including Editor's Choice apps. Analysis was performed between categories and developer types. Findings - Overall, Google's top developers' apps request more risky permissions and IAP than do traditional developers. Other results indicate that free apps are more dangerous than paid apps and star ratings do not signify safe apps. Research limitations/implications - Because of a limited number of Google's top developers and Editor's Choice apps, conclusions are drawn from a small sample of apps and not the entire market. Practical implications - Google's top developers' apps are suited well for increasing revenue for Google and developers at the consumer's expense. Consumers should be wary of top developer trust badges. Social implications - As the lure for {"}top free{"} and {"}top developer{"} software is strong among consumers, this research contributes to societal welfare in that it makes consumers aware that Google top developer app trust badges and free apps are more dangerous than traditional developer and paid apps, as they request risky permissions at a much higher frequency. Therefore, consumers should be very careful when downloading apps that are advertised as {"}top free{"} or {"}top developer{"}. Originality/value - Google's top developers' apps and Editors' Choice apps have not been investigated from the perspective of permissions and IAP before.",
keywords = "Android, Computer privacy, Google top developers, IAP, Mobile device security, Permissions",
author = "Harris, {Mark Alan} and Chin, {Amita G.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/ICS-11-2015-0044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "474--495",
journal = "Information and Computer Security",
issn = "2056-4961",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consumer trust in Google's top developers' apps

T2 - An exploratory study

AU - Harris, Mark Alan

AU - Chin, Amita G.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Purpose - This paper aims to investigate Google's top developers' apps with trust badges to see if they warrant an additional level of trust and confidence from consumers, as stated by Google. Design/methodology/approach - Risky app permissions and in-app purchases (IAP) from Google's top developers and traditional developers were investigated in several Google Play top app categories, including Editor's Choice apps. Analysis was performed between categories and developer types. Findings - Overall, Google's top developers' apps request more risky permissions and IAP than do traditional developers. Other results indicate that free apps are more dangerous than paid apps and star ratings do not signify safe apps. Research limitations/implications - Because of a limited number of Google's top developers and Editor's Choice apps, conclusions are drawn from a small sample of apps and not the entire market. Practical implications - Google's top developers' apps are suited well for increasing revenue for Google and developers at the consumer's expense. Consumers should be wary of top developer trust badges. Social implications - As the lure for "top free" and "top developer" software is strong among consumers, this research contributes to societal welfare in that it makes consumers aware that Google top developer app trust badges and free apps are more dangerous than traditional developer and paid apps, as they request risky permissions at a much higher frequency. Therefore, consumers should be very careful when downloading apps that are advertised as "top free" or "top developer". Originality/value - Google's top developers' apps and Editors' Choice apps have not been investigated from the perspective of permissions and IAP before.

AB - Purpose - This paper aims to investigate Google's top developers' apps with trust badges to see if they warrant an additional level of trust and confidence from consumers, as stated by Google. Design/methodology/approach - Risky app permissions and in-app purchases (IAP) from Google's top developers and traditional developers were investigated in several Google Play top app categories, including Editor's Choice apps. Analysis was performed between categories and developer types. Findings - Overall, Google's top developers' apps request more risky permissions and IAP than do traditional developers. Other results indicate that free apps are more dangerous than paid apps and star ratings do not signify safe apps. Research limitations/implications - Because of a limited number of Google's top developers and Editor's Choice apps, conclusions are drawn from a small sample of apps and not the entire market. Practical implications - Google's top developers' apps are suited well for increasing revenue for Google and developers at the consumer's expense. Consumers should be wary of top developer trust badges. Social implications - As the lure for "top free" and "top developer" software is strong among consumers, this research contributes to societal welfare in that it makes consumers aware that Google top developer app trust badges and free apps are more dangerous than traditional developer and paid apps, as they request risky permissions at a much higher frequency. Therefore, consumers should be very careful when downloading apps that are advertised as "top free" or "top developer". Originality/value - Google's top developers' apps and Editors' Choice apps have not been investigated from the perspective of permissions and IAP before.

KW - Android

KW - Computer privacy

KW - Google top developers

KW - IAP

KW - Mobile device security

KW - Permissions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995968698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995968698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ICS-11-2015-0044

DO - 10.1108/ICS-11-2015-0044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995968698

VL - 24

SP - 474

EP - 495

JO - Information and Computer Security

JF - Information and Computer Security

SN - 2056-4961

IS - 5

ER -