Determinants of maximum exercise capacity in patients with chronic airflow obstruction

Thomas A Dillard, S. Piantadosi, K. R. Rajagopal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) often develop impairment of respiratory muscle function. We hypothesized that inspiratory muscle strength, as assessed by resting, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) may be an important determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO. Twenty ambulatory male patients (mean age, 56 ± 3 years [± SE]) with CAO (FEV1, 1.72 ± 0.21 L) comprised the studied population. Oxygen consumption at incremental cycle ergometry to tolerance (V̇O2max, 1.80 ± 0.20 L/min) served as the dependent variable for regression vs measures of resting pulmonary function. Significant correlations with V̇O2max included power output in watts (r = 0.951), V̇Emax (r = 0.858), Dsb (r = 0.841), PIP (r = 0.816), age (r = -0.809), FEV1 (r = 0.763), and FVC (r = 0.663). The FEV1, Dsb, and PIP each entered into a multiple linear regression relationship describing V̇O2max. Also, when paired with V̇Emax as independent variables in multiple regression, PIP and Dsb each improved description of V̇O2max over V̇Emax alone (p < 0.05), whereas FEV1 and FVC did not (p > 0.05). We conclude that factors other than ventilatory capacity also have a quantitative effect on V̇O2max and that PIP constitutes a determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-271
Number of pages5
JournalChest
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Exercise
Pressure
Ergometry
Respiratory Muscles
Muscle Strength
Oxygen Consumption
Linear Models
Lung
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Determinants of maximum exercise capacity in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. / Dillard, Thomas A; Piantadosi, S.; Rajagopal, K. R.

In: Chest, Vol. 96, No. 2, 01.01.1989, p. 267-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dillard, Thomas A ; Piantadosi, S. ; Rajagopal, K. R. / Determinants of maximum exercise capacity in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. In: Chest. 1989 ; Vol. 96, No. 2. pp. 267-271.
@article{c35f6dcbc0e34083bcb3d6dcdcb956a1,
title = "Determinants of maximum exercise capacity in patients with chronic airflow obstruction",
abstract = "Patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) often develop impairment of respiratory muscle function. We hypothesized that inspiratory muscle strength, as assessed by resting, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) may be an important determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO. Twenty ambulatory male patients (mean age, 56 ± 3 years [± SE]) with CAO (FEV1, 1.72 ± 0.21 L) comprised the studied population. Oxygen consumption at incremental cycle ergometry to tolerance (V̇O2max, 1.80 ± 0.20 L/min) served as the dependent variable for regression vs measures of resting pulmonary function. Significant correlations with V̇O2max included power output in watts (r = 0.951), V̇Emax (r = 0.858), Dsb (r = 0.841), PIP (r = 0.816), age (r = -0.809), FEV1 (r = 0.763), and FVC (r = 0.663). The FEV1, Dsb, and PIP each entered into a multiple linear regression relationship describing V̇O2max. Also, when paired with V̇Emax as independent variables in multiple regression, PIP and Dsb each improved description of V̇O2max over V̇Emax alone (p < 0.05), whereas FEV1 and FVC did not (p > 0.05). We conclude that factors other than ventilatory capacity also have a quantitative effect on V̇O2max and that PIP constitutes a determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO.",
author = "Dillard, {Thomas A} and S. Piantadosi and Rajagopal, {K. R.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.96.2.267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "267--271",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of maximum exercise capacity in patients with chronic airflow obstruction

AU - Dillard, Thomas A

AU - Piantadosi, S.

AU - Rajagopal, K. R.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) often develop impairment of respiratory muscle function. We hypothesized that inspiratory muscle strength, as assessed by resting, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) may be an important determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO. Twenty ambulatory male patients (mean age, 56 ± 3 years [± SE]) with CAO (FEV1, 1.72 ± 0.21 L) comprised the studied population. Oxygen consumption at incremental cycle ergometry to tolerance (V̇O2max, 1.80 ± 0.20 L/min) served as the dependent variable for regression vs measures of resting pulmonary function. Significant correlations with V̇O2max included power output in watts (r = 0.951), V̇Emax (r = 0.858), Dsb (r = 0.841), PIP (r = 0.816), age (r = -0.809), FEV1 (r = 0.763), and FVC (r = 0.663). The FEV1, Dsb, and PIP each entered into a multiple linear regression relationship describing V̇O2max. Also, when paired with V̇Emax as independent variables in multiple regression, PIP and Dsb each improved description of V̇O2max over V̇Emax alone (p < 0.05), whereas FEV1 and FVC did not (p > 0.05). We conclude that factors other than ventilatory capacity also have a quantitative effect on V̇O2max and that PIP constitutes a determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO.

AB - Patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) often develop impairment of respiratory muscle function. We hypothesized that inspiratory muscle strength, as assessed by resting, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) may be an important determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO. Twenty ambulatory male patients (mean age, 56 ± 3 years [± SE]) with CAO (FEV1, 1.72 ± 0.21 L) comprised the studied population. Oxygen consumption at incremental cycle ergometry to tolerance (V̇O2max, 1.80 ± 0.20 L/min) served as the dependent variable for regression vs measures of resting pulmonary function. Significant correlations with V̇O2max included power output in watts (r = 0.951), V̇Emax (r = 0.858), Dsb (r = 0.841), PIP (r = 0.816), age (r = -0.809), FEV1 (r = 0.763), and FVC (r = 0.663). The FEV1, Dsb, and PIP each entered into a multiple linear regression relationship describing V̇O2max. Also, when paired with V̇Emax as independent variables in multiple regression, PIP and Dsb each improved description of V̇O2max over V̇Emax alone (p < 0.05), whereas FEV1 and FVC did not (p > 0.05). We conclude that factors other than ventilatory capacity also have a quantitative effect on V̇O2max and that PIP constitutes a determinant of maximum exercise capacity in patients with CAO.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024337771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024337771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.96.2.267

DO - 10.1378/chest.96.2.267

M3 - Article

C2 - 2752808

AN - SCOPUS:0024337771

VL - 96

SP - 267

EP - 271

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 2

ER -