Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound

Martha Kennedy Terris, T. A. Stamey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

405 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as π/6 (transverse dimension)2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula π/6 (transverse dimension)3.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)984-987
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume145
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate
Phosmet
Weights and Measures
Prostatic Diseases
Prostatectomy

Keywords

  • Prostate
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. / Terris, Martha Kennedy; Stamey, T. A.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 145, No. 5, 01.01.1991, p. 984-987.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f323916b5a24365a94d6b0612999f43,
title = "Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound",
abstract = "Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as π/6 (transverse dimension)2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula π/6 (transverse dimension)3.",
keywords = "Prostate, Ultrasonography",
author = "Terris, {Martha Kennedy} and Stamey, {T. A.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38508-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "984--987",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound

AU - Terris, Martha Kennedy

AU - Stamey, T. A.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as π/6 (transverse dimension)2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula π/6 (transverse dimension)3.

AB - Estimation of prostate gland volume with transrectal ultrasound may provide important information in the evaluation of benign and malignant prostatic diseases. To determine the most accurate means of volume estimation 150 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with 15 separate methods of volume estimation. All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy or cystoprostatectomy. Prostate specimen weights were compared with the results of each volume estimation method. Step-section planimetry, previously assumed to be the most accurate means of volume measurement, exhibited a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93. The elliptical volume, widely used as an alternative to planimetry, demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.90. The most accurate method to estimate prostate weight (r = 0.94) was a variation of the prolate spheroid formula, expressed as π/6 (transverse dimension)2 (anteroposterior dimension). When different volume ranges were considered, this prolate spheroid formula provided the closest estimate of weight in glands of less than 40 gm. and those in the 40 to 80 gm. range. The most accurate method to estimate prostates weighing greater than 80 gm. was the formula π/6 (transverse dimension)3.

KW - Prostate

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025906604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025906604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38508-7

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38508-7

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 984

EP - 987

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -