Editorials

Controversies in family medicine: Should screening techniques for colorectal cancer all have an ‘A’ recommendation? Yes: All conventional screening techniques should have an ‘A’ recommendation

Mark H. Ebell

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)616-617
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican family physician
Volume95
Issue number10
StatePublished - May 15 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

@article{2a2f85693b3846118d782c09ff5de633,
title = "Editorials: Controversies in family medicine: Should screening techniques for colorectal cancer all have an ‘A’ recommendation? Yes: All conventional screening techniques should have an ‘A’ recommendation",
author = "Ebell, {Mark H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "616--617",
journal = "American Family Physician",
issn = "0002-838X",
publisher = "American Academy of Family Physicians",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorials

T2 - Controversies in family medicine: Should screening techniques for colorectal cancer all have an ‘A’ recommendation? Yes: All conventional screening techniques should have an ‘A’ recommendation

AU - Ebell, Mark H.

PY - 2017/5/15

Y1 - 2017/5/15

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019927744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019927744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Editorial

VL - 95

SP - 616

EP - 617

JO - American Family Physician

JF - American Family Physician

SN - 0002-838X

IS - 10

ER -