Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance

S. Hasson, R. Mundorf, W. Barnes, J. Williams, M. Fujii

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of pulsating ultrasound treatment and placebo on delayed onset of muscle soreness produced by an eccentric exercise bout. In addition, the effect of pulsed ultrasound on muscular performance following an eccentric exercise bout was studied. Eighteen untrained subjects were randomly assigned to: 1) ultrasound (A) [N=6] over the areas of concentrated muscle soreness, i.e. proximal vastus lateralis and distal vastus medialis; 2) placebo ultrasound (B) [N=6]; and 3) no therapeutic intervention (C) [N=6]. Baseline data were recorded for maximum isometric knee extension contraction (MVC), maximum knee extension torque (MT), knee extension work (W), and soreness perception (SP). All values were subsequently reassessed 24 and 48 hours after intense muscular activity. Immediately following the 24 hour reassessment the A group received ultrasound treatment, the B group received placebo ultrasound, while the C group received no treatment. Percent deviation from baseline of SP, MVC, MT and W were significantly less for A than B and C (p<0.05) at 48 hours post muscle soreness bout. These data indicate that pulsed ultrasound accelerates restoration of normal muscle performance, and thus is effective in decreasing delayed onset of muscle soreness. The mechanism for decreasing soreness perception in the muscle is unknown, but may be related to decreasing intramuscular pressure and/or decreasing the inflammatory response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-205
Number of pages7
JournalScandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Myalgia
Placebos
Knee
Quadriceps Muscle
Muscles
Torque
Therapeutics
Analgesics
Pressure
Ultrasonic Waves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance. / Hasson, S.; Mundorf, R.; Barnes, W.; Williams, J.; Fujii, M.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.01.1990, p. 199-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hasson, S, Mundorf, R, Barnes, W, Williams, J & Fujii, M 1990, 'Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance', Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 199-205.
Hasson, S. ; Mundorf, R. ; Barnes, W. ; Williams, J. ; Fujii, M. / Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance. In: Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1990 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 199-205.
@article{8514c29e74e245a2a58f5b52588021e0,
title = "Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of pulsating ultrasound treatment and placebo on delayed onset of muscle soreness produced by an eccentric exercise bout. In addition, the effect of pulsed ultrasound on muscular performance following an eccentric exercise bout was studied. Eighteen untrained subjects were randomly assigned to: 1) ultrasound (A) [N=6] over the areas of concentrated muscle soreness, i.e. proximal vastus lateralis and distal vastus medialis; 2) placebo ultrasound (B) [N=6]; and 3) no therapeutic intervention (C) [N=6]. Baseline data were recorded for maximum isometric knee extension contraction (MVC), maximum knee extension torque (MT), knee extension work (W), and soreness perception (SP). All values were subsequently reassessed 24 and 48 hours after intense muscular activity. Immediately following the 24 hour reassessment the A group received ultrasound treatment, the B group received placebo ultrasound, while the C group received no treatment. Percent deviation from baseline of SP, MVC, MT and W were significantly less for A than B and C (p<0.05) at 48 hours post muscle soreness bout. These data indicate that pulsed ultrasound accelerates restoration of normal muscle performance, and thus is effective in decreasing delayed onset of muscle soreness. The mechanism for decreasing soreness perception in the muscle is unknown, but may be related to decreasing intramuscular pressure and/or decreasing the inflammatory response.",
author = "S. Hasson and R. Mundorf and W. Barnes and J. Williams and M. Fujii",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "199--205",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance

AU - Hasson, S.

AU - Mundorf, R.

AU - Barnes, W.

AU - Williams, J.

AU - Fujii, M.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of pulsating ultrasound treatment and placebo on delayed onset of muscle soreness produced by an eccentric exercise bout. In addition, the effect of pulsed ultrasound on muscular performance following an eccentric exercise bout was studied. Eighteen untrained subjects were randomly assigned to: 1) ultrasound (A) [N=6] over the areas of concentrated muscle soreness, i.e. proximal vastus lateralis and distal vastus medialis; 2) placebo ultrasound (B) [N=6]; and 3) no therapeutic intervention (C) [N=6]. Baseline data were recorded for maximum isometric knee extension contraction (MVC), maximum knee extension torque (MT), knee extension work (W), and soreness perception (SP). All values were subsequently reassessed 24 and 48 hours after intense muscular activity. Immediately following the 24 hour reassessment the A group received ultrasound treatment, the B group received placebo ultrasound, while the C group received no treatment. Percent deviation from baseline of SP, MVC, MT and W were significantly less for A than B and C (p<0.05) at 48 hours post muscle soreness bout. These data indicate that pulsed ultrasound accelerates restoration of normal muscle performance, and thus is effective in decreasing delayed onset of muscle soreness. The mechanism for decreasing soreness perception in the muscle is unknown, but may be related to decreasing intramuscular pressure and/or decreasing the inflammatory response.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of pulsating ultrasound treatment and placebo on delayed onset of muscle soreness produced by an eccentric exercise bout. In addition, the effect of pulsed ultrasound on muscular performance following an eccentric exercise bout was studied. Eighteen untrained subjects were randomly assigned to: 1) ultrasound (A) [N=6] over the areas of concentrated muscle soreness, i.e. proximal vastus lateralis and distal vastus medialis; 2) placebo ultrasound (B) [N=6]; and 3) no therapeutic intervention (C) [N=6]. Baseline data were recorded for maximum isometric knee extension contraction (MVC), maximum knee extension torque (MT), knee extension work (W), and soreness perception (SP). All values were subsequently reassessed 24 and 48 hours after intense muscular activity. Immediately following the 24 hour reassessment the A group received ultrasound treatment, the B group received placebo ultrasound, while the C group received no treatment. Percent deviation from baseline of SP, MVC, MT and W were significantly less for A than B and C (p<0.05) at 48 hours post muscle soreness bout. These data indicate that pulsed ultrasound accelerates restoration of normal muscle performance, and thus is effective in decreasing delayed onset of muscle soreness. The mechanism for decreasing soreness perception in the muscle is unknown, but may be related to decreasing intramuscular pressure and/or decreasing the inflammatory response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025201207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025201207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 199

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 4

ER -