Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light

Daron Gale Ferris, Wenjing Li, Ulf Gustafsson, Richard W. Lieberman, Oscar Galdos, Carlos Santos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective.: To determine the potential utility of polarized light used during colposcopic examinations. Materials and Methods.: Matched, polarized, and unpolarized colposcopic images and diagnostic annotations from 31 subjects receiving excisional treatment of cervical neoplasia were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean Euclidean distances between the centroids of the gaussian ellipsoids for the different epithelial types were calculated for unpolarized and polarized images. Results.: The sensitivities of polarized colposcopic annotations for discriminating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher were greater for all 3 acetowhite categories when compared with unpolarized annotations (58% [44/76] vs 45% [34/76], 68% [50/74] vs 59% [45/76], and 68% [49/72] vs 66% [50/76], respectively). The average percent differences in Euclidean distances between the epithelial types for unpolarized and polarized cervical images were as follows: CIN 2/3 versus CIN 1 = 33% (10/30, p =.03), CIN 2/3 versus columnar epithelium = 22% (p =.004), CIN 2/3 versus immature metaplasia = 29% (14/47, p =.11), and CIN 1 versus immature metaplasia = 27% (4.4/16, p =.16). Conclusions.: Because of its ability to interrogate at a deeper plane and eliminate obscuring glare, polarized light colposcopy may enhance the evaluation and detection of cervical neoplasias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-154
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Colposcopy
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Light
Metaplasia
Glare
Neoplasms
Epithelium
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • cervical neoplasia
  • colposcopy
  • cross-polarization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Ferris, D. G., Li, W., Gustafsson, U., Lieberman, R. W., Galdos, O., & Santos, C. (2010). Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 14(3), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d52f59

Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light. / Ferris, Daron Gale; Li, Wenjing; Gustafsson, Ulf; Lieberman, Richard W.; Galdos, Oscar; Santos, Carlos.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.01.2010, p. 149-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferris, DG, Li, W, Gustafsson, U, Lieberman, RW, Galdos, O & Santos, C 2010, 'Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light', Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d52f59
Ferris, Daron Gale ; Li, Wenjing ; Gustafsson, Ulf ; Lieberman, Richard W. ; Galdos, Oscar ; Santos, Carlos. / Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light. In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2010 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 149-154.
@article{76c0b928a492475faaa8892fdef80519,
title = "Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light",
abstract = "Objective.: To determine the potential utility of polarized light used during colposcopic examinations. Materials and Methods.: Matched, polarized, and unpolarized colposcopic images and diagnostic annotations from 31 subjects receiving excisional treatment of cervical neoplasia were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean Euclidean distances between the centroids of the gaussian ellipsoids for the different epithelial types were calculated for unpolarized and polarized images. Results.: The sensitivities of polarized colposcopic annotations for discriminating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher were greater for all 3 acetowhite categories when compared with unpolarized annotations (58{\%} [44/76] vs 45{\%} [34/76], 68{\%} [50/74] vs 59{\%} [45/76], and 68{\%} [49/72] vs 66{\%} [50/76], respectively). The average percent differences in Euclidean distances between the epithelial types for unpolarized and polarized cervical images were as follows: CIN 2/3 versus CIN 1 = 33{\%} (10/30, p =.03), CIN 2/3 versus columnar epithelium = 22{\%} (p =.004), CIN 2/3 versus immature metaplasia = 29{\%} (14/47, p =.11), and CIN 1 versus immature metaplasia = 27{\%} (4.4/16, p =.16). Conclusions.: Because of its ability to interrogate at a deeper plane and eliminate obscuring glare, polarized light colposcopy may enhance the evaluation and detection of cervical neoplasias.",
keywords = "cervical neoplasia, colposcopy, cross-polarization",
author = "Ferris, {Daron Gale} and Wenjing Li and Ulf Gustafsson and Lieberman, {Richard W.} and Oscar Galdos and Carlos Santos",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d52f59",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "149--154",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing colposcopy with polarized light

AU - Ferris, Daron Gale

AU - Li, Wenjing

AU - Gustafsson, Ulf

AU - Lieberman, Richard W.

AU - Galdos, Oscar

AU - Santos, Carlos

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Objective.: To determine the potential utility of polarized light used during colposcopic examinations. Materials and Methods.: Matched, polarized, and unpolarized colposcopic images and diagnostic annotations from 31 subjects receiving excisional treatment of cervical neoplasia were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean Euclidean distances between the centroids of the gaussian ellipsoids for the different epithelial types were calculated for unpolarized and polarized images. Results.: The sensitivities of polarized colposcopic annotations for discriminating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher were greater for all 3 acetowhite categories when compared with unpolarized annotations (58% [44/76] vs 45% [34/76], 68% [50/74] vs 59% [45/76], and 68% [49/72] vs 66% [50/76], respectively). The average percent differences in Euclidean distances between the epithelial types for unpolarized and polarized cervical images were as follows: CIN 2/3 versus CIN 1 = 33% (10/30, p =.03), CIN 2/3 versus columnar epithelium = 22% (p =.004), CIN 2/3 versus immature metaplasia = 29% (14/47, p =.11), and CIN 1 versus immature metaplasia = 27% (4.4/16, p =.16). Conclusions.: Because of its ability to interrogate at a deeper plane and eliminate obscuring glare, polarized light colposcopy may enhance the evaluation and detection of cervical neoplasias.

AB - Objective.: To determine the potential utility of polarized light used during colposcopic examinations. Materials and Methods.: Matched, polarized, and unpolarized colposcopic images and diagnostic annotations from 31 subjects receiving excisional treatment of cervical neoplasia were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean Euclidean distances between the centroids of the gaussian ellipsoids for the different epithelial types were calculated for unpolarized and polarized images. Results.: The sensitivities of polarized colposcopic annotations for discriminating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher were greater for all 3 acetowhite categories when compared with unpolarized annotations (58% [44/76] vs 45% [34/76], 68% [50/74] vs 59% [45/76], and 68% [49/72] vs 66% [50/76], respectively). The average percent differences in Euclidean distances between the epithelial types for unpolarized and polarized cervical images were as follows: CIN 2/3 versus CIN 1 = 33% (10/30, p =.03), CIN 2/3 versus columnar epithelium = 22% (p =.004), CIN 2/3 versus immature metaplasia = 29% (14/47, p =.11), and CIN 1 versus immature metaplasia = 27% (4.4/16, p =.16). Conclusions.: Because of its ability to interrogate at a deeper plane and eliminate obscuring glare, polarized light colposcopy may enhance the evaluation and detection of cervical neoplasias.

KW - cervical neoplasia

KW - colposcopy

KW - cross-polarization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954933108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954933108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d52f59

DO - 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d52f59

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 149

EP - 154

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 3

ER -