Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings

Replication With a Nonclinical Sample

Caleb J. Siefert, Michelle B. Stein, Jenelle M Slavin-Mulford, Samuel Justin Sinclair, Greg Haggerty, Mark A. Blais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The content of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards can, in some cases, influence how respondents form narratives. This study examines how imagery from select TAT cards affects the narratives of respondents from a nonclinical setting. The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, Lohr, Silk, Kerber, & Goodrich, 1989) was used to rate narratives. Forty-nine college students provided narratives to 6 TAT cards. Narratives were rated by two expert raters using the SCORS–G. Consistent with prior research, Card 2 exhibited the most pull for adaptive ratings on SCORS–G scales, and 3 BM exhibited the most pull for maladaptive ratings. Findings for other cards were mixed. Although raters were highly reliable, internal consistency estimates were lower than desirable for 6 of the 8 SCORS–G scales. Variance component estimates indicated that card by person interactions accounted for the largest amount of variance in person-level scores. Results and limitations are discussed in light of prior research. We also make suggestions for further lines of research in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)598-607
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume98
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Thematic Apperception Test
Research
Silk
Imagery (Psychotherapy)
Cognition
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings : Replication With a Nonclinical Sample. / Siefert, Caleb J.; Stein, Michelle B.; Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle M; Sinclair, Samuel Justin; Haggerty, Greg; Blais, Mark A.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 98, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 598-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siefert, Caleb J. ; Stein, Michelle B. ; Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle M ; Sinclair, Samuel Justin ; Haggerty, Greg ; Blais, Mark A. / Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings : Replication With a Nonclinical Sample. In: Journal of Personality Assessment. 2016 ; Vol. 98, No. 6. pp. 598-607.
@article{5fe9c2974aad4a318f575fbf04fefd18,
title = "Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings: Replication With a Nonclinical Sample",
abstract = "The content of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards can, in some cases, influence how respondents form narratives. This study examines how imagery from select TAT cards affects the narratives of respondents from a nonclinical setting. The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, Lohr, Silk, Kerber, & Goodrich, 1989) was used to rate narratives. Forty-nine college students provided narratives to 6 TAT cards. Narratives were rated by two expert raters using the SCORS–G. Consistent with prior research, Card 2 exhibited the most pull for adaptive ratings on SCORS–G scales, and 3 BM exhibited the most pull for maladaptive ratings. Findings for other cards were mixed. Although raters were highly reliable, internal consistency estimates were lower than desirable for 6 of the 8 SCORS–G scales. Variance component estimates indicated that card by person interactions accounted for the largest amount of variance in person-level scores. Results and limitations are discussed in light of prior research. We also make suggestions for further lines of research in this area.",
author = "Siefert, {Caleb J.} and Stein, {Michelle B.} and Slavin-Mulford, {Jenelle M} and Sinclair, {Samuel Justin} and Greg Haggerty and Blais, {Mark A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00223891.2016.1167696",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "598--607",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings

T2 - Replication With a Nonclinical Sample

AU - Siefert, Caleb J.

AU - Stein, Michelle B.

AU - Slavin-Mulford, Jenelle M

AU - Sinclair, Samuel Justin

AU - Haggerty, Greg

AU - Blais, Mark A.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - The content of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards can, in some cases, influence how respondents form narratives. This study examines how imagery from select TAT cards affects the narratives of respondents from a nonclinical setting. The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, Lohr, Silk, Kerber, & Goodrich, 1989) was used to rate narratives. Forty-nine college students provided narratives to 6 TAT cards. Narratives were rated by two expert raters using the SCORS–G. Consistent with prior research, Card 2 exhibited the most pull for adaptive ratings on SCORS–G scales, and 3 BM exhibited the most pull for maladaptive ratings. Findings for other cards were mixed. Although raters were highly reliable, internal consistency estimates were lower than desirable for 6 of the 8 SCORS–G scales. Variance component estimates indicated that card by person interactions accounted for the largest amount of variance in person-level scores. Results and limitations are discussed in light of prior research. We also make suggestions for further lines of research in this area.

AB - The content of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) cards can, in some cases, influence how respondents form narratives. This study examines how imagery from select TAT cards affects the narratives of respondents from a nonclinical setting. The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale–Global Rating Method (SCORS–G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker, 2011; Westen, Lohr, Silk, Kerber, & Goodrich, 1989) was used to rate narratives. Forty-nine college students provided narratives to 6 TAT cards. Narratives were rated by two expert raters using the SCORS–G. Consistent with prior research, Card 2 exhibited the most pull for adaptive ratings on SCORS–G scales, and 3 BM exhibited the most pull for maladaptive ratings. Findings for other cards were mixed. Although raters were highly reliable, internal consistency estimates were lower than desirable for 6 of the 8 SCORS–G scales. Variance component estimates indicated that card by person interactions accounted for the largest amount of variance in person-level scores. Results and limitations are discussed in light of prior research. We also make suggestions for further lines of research in this area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964556470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964556470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2016.1167696

DO - 10.1080/00223891.2016.1167696

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 598

EP - 607

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 6

ER -