Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research

Steven Scott Coughlin, Amyre Barker, Angus Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ethics and scientific integrity of biomedical and public health research requires that researchers behave in appropriate ways. However, this requires more than following of published research guidelines that seek to prevent scientific misconduct relating to serious deviations from widely accepted scientific norms for proposing, conducting, and reporting research (e.g., fabrication or falsification of research data or failures to report potential conflicts of interest). In this paper we argue for a broader account of scientific integrity, one consistent with that defended by the United States Institute of Medicine, involving a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions as a researcher and to practices consistent with the responsible conduct of research and protection of the research participants. Maintaining high standards of ethical and scientific integrity helps to maintain public trust in the research enterprise. An increasing number of authors have pointed to the importance of mentoring and education in relation to the responsible conduct of science in preventing transgressions of scientific integrity. Just like in clinical research and biomedicine, epidemiologists and other public health researchers have the responsibility to exhibit and foster the very highest standards of scientific integrity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Health Reviews
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Ethics
Public Health
Research
Research Personnel
Scientific Misconduct
State Medicine
Conflict of Interest
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Guidelines
Education

Keywords

  • Clinical research
  • Epidemiology
  • Ethics
  • Plagiarism
  • Public health
  • Scientific integrity
  • Scientific misconduct

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Community and Home Care
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research. / Coughlin, Steven Scott; Barker, Amyre; Dawson, Angus.

In: Public Health Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{186aa62087b7423db80a84e1404cceae,
title = "Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research",
abstract = "The ethics and scientific integrity of biomedical and public health research requires that researchers behave in appropriate ways. However, this requires more than following of published research guidelines that seek to prevent scientific misconduct relating to serious deviations from widely accepted scientific norms for proposing, conducting, and reporting research (e.g., fabrication or falsification of research data or failures to report potential conflicts of interest). In this paper we argue for a broader account of scientific integrity, one consistent with that defended by the United States Institute of Medicine, involving a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions as a researcher and to practices consistent with the responsible conduct of research and protection of the research participants. Maintaining high standards of ethical and scientific integrity helps to maintain public trust in the research enterprise. An increasing number of authors have pointed to the importance of mentoring and education in relation to the responsible conduct of science in preventing transgressions of scientific integrity. Just like in clinical research and biomedicine, epidemiologists and other public health researchers have the responsibility to exhibit and foster the very highest standards of scientific integrity.",
keywords = "Clinical research, Epidemiology, Ethics, Plagiarism, Public health, Scientific integrity, Scientific misconduct",
author = "Coughlin, {Steven Scott} and Amyre Barker and Angus Dawson",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF03391657",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Public Health Reviews",
issn = "0301-0422",
publisher = "EHESP Presses",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics and scientific integrity in public health, epidemiological and clinical research

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

AU - Barker, Amyre

AU - Dawson, Angus

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The ethics and scientific integrity of biomedical and public health research requires that researchers behave in appropriate ways. However, this requires more than following of published research guidelines that seek to prevent scientific misconduct relating to serious deviations from widely accepted scientific norms for proposing, conducting, and reporting research (e.g., fabrication or falsification of research data or failures to report potential conflicts of interest). In this paper we argue for a broader account of scientific integrity, one consistent with that defended by the United States Institute of Medicine, involving a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions as a researcher and to practices consistent with the responsible conduct of research and protection of the research participants. Maintaining high standards of ethical and scientific integrity helps to maintain public trust in the research enterprise. An increasing number of authors have pointed to the importance of mentoring and education in relation to the responsible conduct of science in preventing transgressions of scientific integrity. Just like in clinical research and biomedicine, epidemiologists and other public health researchers have the responsibility to exhibit and foster the very highest standards of scientific integrity.

AB - The ethics and scientific integrity of biomedical and public health research requires that researchers behave in appropriate ways. However, this requires more than following of published research guidelines that seek to prevent scientific misconduct relating to serious deviations from widely accepted scientific norms for proposing, conducting, and reporting research (e.g., fabrication or falsification of research data or failures to report potential conflicts of interest). In this paper we argue for a broader account of scientific integrity, one consistent with that defended by the United States Institute of Medicine, involving a commitment to intellectual honesty and personal responsibility for one's actions as a researcher and to practices consistent with the responsible conduct of research and protection of the research participants. Maintaining high standards of ethical and scientific integrity helps to maintain public trust in the research enterprise. An increasing number of authors have pointed to the importance of mentoring and education in relation to the responsible conduct of science in preventing transgressions of scientific integrity. Just like in clinical research and biomedicine, epidemiologists and other public health researchers have the responsibility to exhibit and foster the very highest standards of scientific integrity.

KW - Clinical research

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Ethics

KW - Plagiarism

KW - Public health

KW - Scientific integrity

KW - Scientific misconduct

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867656703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867656703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03391657

DO - 10.1007/BF03391657

M3 - Review article

VL - 34

JO - Public Health Reviews

JF - Public Health Reviews

SN - 0301-0422

IS - 1

ER -