Evaluation of an Embedded Program Through the Embedded Ecosystem Framework and Toolkit

Kim Mears, Maryska Connolly-Brown, Julie K Gaines, Lindsay Ellis Anne Blake, Kathy J Davies, Peter C Shipman, Gail Marie Kouame

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article provides a theoretical model for understanding embedded librarianship by introducing an Embedded Ecosystem Framework (EEF) and toolkit to evaluate the health of an embedded program in an academic setting. The toolkit measures the tangible services and the intangible relationships with users in embedded programs under the framework's four facets: Actions, Awareness, Perceptions, and Impact. The Actions facet is measured by traditional library reference metrics, while Awareness, Perception, and Impact measures such as program awareness, self-reported academic gains, or service satisfaction are measured by a survey as well as individual and class evaluations. Analysis of data trends can indicate gaps in services provided or utilization of services by specific user groups to encourage more active engagement with their communities. The toolkit is customizable to fit other embedded librarian programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-539
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Academic Librarianship
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

evaluation
self awareness
librarianship
librarian
utilization
trend
health
community
Group

Keywords

  • Embedded librarianship
  • Library services
  • Program evaluation
  • Quality improvement
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • Theoretical models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Evaluation of an Embedded Program Through the Embedded Ecosystem Framework and Toolkit. / Mears, Kim; Connolly-Brown, Maryska; Gaines, Julie K; Blake, Lindsay Ellis Anne; Davies, Kathy J; Shipman, Peter C; Kouame, Gail Marie.

In: Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2017, p. 532-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c939ed09da84f9783fa587c0ef1a6a4,
title = "Evaluation of an Embedded Program Through the Embedded Ecosystem Framework and Toolkit",
abstract = "This article provides a theoretical model for understanding embedded librarianship by introducing an Embedded Ecosystem Framework (EEF) and toolkit to evaluate the health of an embedded program in an academic setting. The toolkit measures the tangible services and the intangible relationships with users in embedded programs under the framework's four facets: Actions, Awareness, Perceptions, and Impact. The Actions facet is measured by traditional library reference metrics, while Awareness, Perception, and Impact measures such as program awareness, self-reported academic gains, or service satisfaction are measured by a survey as well as individual and class evaluations. Analysis of data trends can indicate gaps in services provided or utilization of services by specific user groups to encourage more active engagement with their communities. The toolkit is customizable to fit other embedded librarian programs.",
keywords = "Embedded librarianship, Library services, Program evaluation, Quality improvement, Surveys and questionnaires, Theoretical models",
author = "Kim Mears and Maryska Connolly-Brown and Gaines, {Julie K} and Blake, {Lindsay Ellis Anne} and Davies, {Kathy J} and Shipman, {Peter C} and Kouame, {Gail Marie}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.acalib.2017.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "532--539",
journal = "Journal of Academic Librarianship",
issn = "0099-1333",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an Embedded Program Through the Embedded Ecosystem Framework and Toolkit

AU - Mears, Kim

AU - Connolly-Brown, Maryska

AU - Gaines, Julie K

AU - Blake, Lindsay Ellis Anne

AU - Davies, Kathy J

AU - Shipman, Peter C

AU - Kouame, Gail Marie

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article provides a theoretical model for understanding embedded librarianship by introducing an Embedded Ecosystem Framework (EEF) and toolkit to evaluate the health of an embedded program in an academic setting. The toolkit measures the tangible services and the intangible relationships with users in embedded programs under the framework's four facets: Actions, Awareness, Perceptions, and Impact. The Actions facet is measured by traditional library reference metrics, while Awareness, Perception, and Impact measures such as program awareness, self-reported academic gains, or service satisfaction are measured by a survey as well as individual and class evaluations. Analysis of data trends can indicate gaps in services provided or utilization of services by specific user groups to encourage more active engagement with their communities. The toolkit is customizable to fit other embedded librarian programs.

AB - This article provides a theoretical model for understanding embedded librarianship by introducing an Embedded Ecosystem Framework (EEF) and toolkit to evaluate the health of an embedded program in an academic setting. The toolkit measures the tangible services and the intangible relationships with users in embedded programs under the framework's four facets: Actions, Awareness, Perceptions, and Impact. The Actions facet is measured by traditional library reference metrics, while Awareness, Perception, and Impact measures such as program awareness, self-reported academic gains, or service satisfaction are measured by a survey as well as individual and class evaluations. Analysis of data trends can indicate gaps in services provided or utilization of services by specific user groups to encourage more active engagement with their communities. The toolkit is customizable to fit other embedded librarian programs.

KW - Embedded librarianship

KW - Library services

KW - Program evaluation

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Surveys and questionnaires

KW - Theoretical models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027402836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027402836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 532

EP - 539

JO - Journal of Academic Librarianship

JF - Journal of Academic Librarianship

SN - 0099-1333

IS - 6

ER -