Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: A study in rabbits

Jaebum Lee, Janet H. Sieweke, Nancy A. Rodriguez, Peter Schüpbach, Håkan Lindström, Cristiano Susin, Ulf M E Wikesjö

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to screen candidate nano-technology-modified, micro-structured zirconia implant surfaces relative to local bone formation and osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Proprietary nano-technology surface-modified (calcium phosphate: CaP) micro-structured zirconia implants (A and C), control micro-structured zirconia implants (ZiUnite™), and titanium porous oxide implants (TiUnite™) were implanted into the femoral condyle in 40 adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal received one implant in each hind leg; thus, 20 animals received A and C implants and 20 animals received ZiUnite™ and TiUnite™ implants in contralateral hind legs. Ten animals/group were euthanized at weeks 3 and 6 when biopsies of the implant sites were processed for histometric analysis using digital photomicrographs produced using backscatter scanning electron microscopy. Results: The TiUnite™ surface demonstrated significantly greater bone-implant contact (BIC) (77.6±2.6%) compared with the A (64.6±3.6%) and C (62.2±3.1%) surfaces at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Numerical differences between ZiUnite™ (70.5±3.1%) and A and C surfaces did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Similarly, there were non-significant differences between the TiUnite™ and the ZiUnite™ surfaces (p>0.05). At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in BIC between the TiUnite™ (67.1±4.2%), ZiUnite™ (69.7±5.7%), A (68.6±1.9%), and C (64.5±4.1%) surfaces (p>0.05). Conclusion: TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces exhibit high levels of osseointegration that, in this model, confirm their advanced osteoconductive properties. Addition of CaP nano-technology to the ZiUnite™ surface does not enhance the already advanced osteoconductivity displayed by the TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-617
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume36
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

Fingerprint

Rabbits
Technology
Osseointegration
Bone and Bones
Leg
Thigh
Osteogenesis
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Biopsy
zirconium oxide
titanium dioxide
calcium phosphate

Keywords

  • Backscatter scanning electron microscopy
  • Bone density
  • Bone-implant contact
  • Calcium phosphate
  • Nano-technology
  • Osseointegration
  • TiUnite™
  • ZiUnite™

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Lee, J., Sieweke, J. H., Rodriguez, N. A., Schüpbach, P., Lindström, H., Susin, C., & Wikesjö, U. M. E. (2009). Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: A study in rabbits. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36(7), 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x

Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants : A study in rabbits. / Lee, Jaebum; Sieweke, Janet H.; Rodriguez, Nancy A.; Schüpbach, Peter; Lindström, Håkan; Susin, Cristiano; Wikesjö, Ulf M E.

In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Vol. 36, No. 7, 01.07.2009, p. 610-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, J, Sieweke, JH, Rodriguez, NA, Schüpbach, P, Lindström, H, Susin, C & Wikesjö, UME 2009, 'Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: A study in rabbits', Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x
Lee, Jaebum ; Sieweke, Janet H. ; Rodriguez, Nancy A. ; Schüpbach, Peter ; Lindström, Håkan ; Susin, Cristiano ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E. / Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants : A study in rabbits. In: Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 610-617.
@article{e5b1368794c54675981ceb781f57cf98,
title = "Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: A study in rabbits",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to screen candidate nano-technology-modified, micro-structured zirconia implant surfaces relative to local bone formation and osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Proprietary nano-technology surface-modified (calcium phosphate: CaP) micro-structured zirconia implants (A and C), control micro-structured zirconia implants (ZiUnite™), and titanium porous oxide implants (TiUnite™) were implanted into the femoral condyle in 40 adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal received one implant in each hind leg; thus, 20 animals received A and C implants and 20 animals received ZiUnite™ and TiUnite™ implants in contralateral hind legs. Ten animals/group were euthanized at weeks 3 and 6 when biopsies of the implant sites were processed for histometric analysis using digital photomicrographs produced using backscatter scanning electron microscopy. Results: The TiUnite™ surface demonstrated significantly greater bone-implant contact (BIC) (77.6±2.6{\%}) compared with the A (64.6±3.6{\%}) and C (62.2±3.1{\%}) surfaces at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Numerical differences between ZiUnite™ (70.5±3.1{\%}) and A and C surfaces did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Similarly, there were non-significant differences between the TiUnite™ and the ZiUnite™ surfaces (p>0.05). At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in BIC between the TiUnite™ (67.1±4.2{\%}), ZiUnite™ (69.7±5.7{\%}), A (68.6±1.9{\%}), and C (64.5±4.1{\%}) surfaces (p>0.05). Conclusion: TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces exhibit high levels of osseointegration that, in this model, confirm their advanced osteoconductive properties. Addition of CaP nano-technology to the ZiUnite™ surface does not enhance the already advanced osteoconductivity displayed by the TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces.",
keywords = "Backscatter scanning electron microscopy, Bone density, Bone-implant contact, Calcium phosphate, Nano-technology, Osseointegration, TiUnite™, ZiUnite™",
author = "Jaebum Lee and Sieweke, {Janet H.} and Rodriguez, {Nancy A.} and Peter Sch{\"u}pbach and H{\aa}kan Lindstr{\"o}m and Cristiano Susin and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "610--617",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Periodontology",
issn = "0303-6979",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants

T2 - A study in rabbits

AU - Lee, Jaebum

AU - Sieweke, Janet H.

AU - Rodriguez, Nancy A.

AU - Schüpbach, Peter

AU - Lindström, Håkan

AU - Susin, Cristiano

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to screen candidate nano-technology-modified, micro-structured zirconia implant surfaces relative to local bone formation and osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Proprietary nano-technology surface-modified (calcium phosphate: CaP) micro-structured zirconia implants (A and C), control micro-structured zirconia implants (ZiUnite™), and titanium porous oxide implants (TiUnite™) were implanted into the femoral condyle in 40 adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal received one implant in each hind leg; thus, 20 animals received A and C implants and 20 animals received ZiUnite™ and TiUnite™ implants in contralateral hind legs. Ten animals/group were euthanized at weeks 3 and 6 when biopsies of the implant sites were processed for histometric analysis using digital photomicrographs produced using backscatter scanning electron microscopy. Results: The TiUnite™ surface demonstrated significantly greater bone-implant contact (BIC) (77.6±2.6%) compared with the A (64.6±3.6%) and C (62.2±3.1%) surfaces at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Numerical differences between ZiUnite™ (70.5±3.1%) and A and C surfaces did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Similarly, there were non-significant differences between the TiUnite™ and the ZiUnite™ surfaces (p>0.05). At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in BIC between the TiUnite™ (67.1±4.2%), ZiUnite™ (69.7±5.7%), A (68.6±1.9%), and C (64.5±4.1%) surfaces (p>0.05). Conclusion: TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces exhibit high levels of osseointegration that, in this model, confirm their advanced osteoconductive properties. Addition of CaP nano-technology to the ZiUnite™ surface does not enhance the already advanced osteoconductivity displayed by the TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to screen candidate nano-technology-modified, micro-structured zirconia implant surfaces relative to local bone formation and osseointegration. Materials and Methods: Proprietary nano-technology surface-modified (calcium phosphate: CaP) micro-structured zirconia implants (A and C), control micro-structured zirconia implants (ZiUnite™), and titanium porous oxide implants (TiUnite™) were implanted into the femoral condyle in 40 adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal received one implant in each hind leg; thus, 20 animals received A and C implants and 20 animals received ZiUnite™ and TiUnite™ implants in contralateral hind legs. Ten animals/group were euthanized at weeks 3 and 6 when biopsies of the implant sites were processed for histometric analysis using digital photomicrographs produced using backscatter scanning electron microscopy. Results: The TiUnite™ surface demonstrated significantly greater bone-implant contact (BIC) (77.6±2.6%) compared with the A (64.6±3.6%) and C (62.2±3.1%) surfaces at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Numerical differences between ZiUnite™ (70.5±3.1%) and A and C surfaces did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Similarly, there were non-significant differences between the TiUnite™ and the ZiUnite™ surfaces (p>0.05). At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in BIC between the TiUnite™ (67.1±4.2%), ZiUnite™ (69.7±5.7%), A (68.6±1.9%), and C (64.5±4.1%) surfaces (p>0.05). Conclusion: TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces exhibit high levels of osseointegration that, in this model, confirm their advanced osteoconductive properties. Addition of CaP nano-technology to the ZiUnite™ surface does not enhance the already advanced osteoconductivity displayed by the TiUnite™ and ZiUnite™ implant surfaces.

KW - Backscatter scanning electron microscopy

KW - Bone density

KW - Bone-implant contact

KW - Calcium phosphate

KW - Nano-technology

KW - Osseointegration

KW - TiUnite™

KW - ZiUnite™

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049123282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68049123282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19538335

AN - SCOPUS:68049123282

VL - 36

SP - 610

EP - 617

JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology

SN - 0303-6979

IS - 7

ER -