Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate silica-coating/silane treatment techniques for zirconia bonding. Methods: 19 groups of zirconia disks were subjected to different surface treatments: polished or sandblasted by CoJet or alumina, and treatment with silane or zirconia primers (containing phosphate- or phosphonate-monomer). After surface treatments, the zirconia disks were cemented with resin cements and stored in deionized water for 2 hours at 37°C prior to shear bond strength testing. Zirconia surface (polished and unpolished), CoJet sand, Cojet-treated zirconia surface (before and after water rinsing) and representative debonded surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The zirconia surface after silica-coating was examined by Fourier Transform Infrared-Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIRATR) spectroscopy. Results: A non-phosphate-containing resin cement (Choice 2) had almost no bond strength on polished zirconia, while MDP-containing cements (Panavia F2.0) had mild bond strength. After zirconia was sandblasted with CoJet or alumina, bond strengths were slightly increased. Silane treatment did not increase bond strength, while phosphate/carboxylate-based primer (i.e. Exp Z-Prime) doubled the bond strengths. Silica nanoparticles identified by FTIR-ATR spectra, were observed by SEM on the zirconia surface after CoJet treatment. However, these nanoparticles were removed by forceful water stream. (Am J Dent 2011; 24: 79-84).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 79-84 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | American journal of dentistry |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 2 |
State | Published - Apr 1 2011 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Dentistry(all)
Cite this
Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding. / Chen, Liang; Suh, Byoung I.N.; Kim, Jongryul; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.
In: American journal of dentistry, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.04.2011, p. 79-84.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding
AU - Chen, Liang
AU - Suh, Byoung I.N.
AU - Kim, Jongryul
AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate silica-coating/silane treatment techniques for zirconia bonding. Methods: 19 groups of zirconia disks were subjected to different surface treatments: polished or sandblasted by CoJet or alumina, and treatment with silane or zirconia primers (containing phosphate- or phosphonate-monomer). After surface treatments, the zirconia disks were cemented with resin cements and stored in deionized water for 2 hours at 37°C prior to shear bond strength testing. Zirconia surface (polished and unpolished), CoJet sand, Cojet-treated zirconia surface (before and after water rinsing) and representative debonded surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The zirconia surface after silica-coating was examined by Fourier Transform Infrared-Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIRATR) spectroscopy. Results: A non-phosphate-containing resin cement (Choice 2) had almost no bond strength on polished zirconia, while MDP-containing cements (Panavia F2.0) had mild bond strength. After zirconia was sandblasted with CoJet or alumina, bond strengths were slightly increased. Silane treatment did not increase bond strength, while phosphate/carboxylate-based primer (i.e. Exp Z-Prime) doubled the bond strengths. Silica nanoparticles identified by FTIR-ATR spectra, were observed by SEM on the zirconia surface after CoJet treatment. However, these nanoparticles were removed by forceful water stream. (Am J Dent 2011; 24: 79-84).
AB - Purpose: To evaluate silica-coating/silane treatment techniques for zirconia bonding. Methods: 19 groups of zirconia disks were subjected to different surface treatments: polished or sandblasted by CoJet or alumina, and treatment with silane or zirconia primers (containing phosphate- or phosphonate-monomer). After surface treatments, the zirconia disks were cemented with resin cements and stored in deionized water for 2 hours at 37°C prior to shear bond strength testing. Zirconia surface (polished and unpolished), CoJet sand, Cojet-treated zirconia surface (before and after water rinsing) and representative debonded surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The zirconia surface after silica-coating was examined by Fourier Transform Infrared-Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIRATR) spectroscopy. Results: A non-phosphate-containing resin cement (Choice 2) had almost no bond strength on polished zirconia, while MDP-containing cements (Panavia F2.0) had mild bond strength. After zirconia was sandblasted with CoJet or alumina, bond strengths were slightly increased. Silane treatment did not increase bond strength, while phosphate/carboxylate-based primer (i.e. Exp Z-Prime) doubled the bond strengths. Silica nanoparticles identified by FTIR-ATR spectra, were observed by SEM on the zirconia surface after CoJet treatment. However, these nanoparticles were removed by forceful water stream. (Am J Dent 2011; 24: 79-84).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959641915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959641915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 21698986
AN - SCOPUS:79959641915
VL - 24
SP - 79
EP - 84
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
SN - 0894-8275
IS - 2
ER -