Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents

Robert E. McKeown, Carol Z. Garrison, Kirby L. Jackson, Steven P. Cuffe, Cheryl L. Addy, Jennifer L Waller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assessed whether the presence of both natural parents in the home and the level of perceived emotional bonding in the family, as measured by the cohesion component of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, were independent predictors of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a diverse community sample of 3,191 young adolescents. In cross-sectional analysis, cohesion was significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for family structure and parent education, but there were significant interactions of cohesion with race and gender. Higher CES-D scores were associated with lower cohesion scores, with partial R2 values from 0.11 for African American female adolescents to 0.29 for White female adolescents. In longitudinal analysis, the Year 1 cohesion score explained only a small amount of the variance in Year 2 CES-D after controlling for Year 1 CES-D; however, the change in cohesion score from Year 1 to Year 2 was a significant predictor after controlling for baseline CES-D and cohesion scores. Neither family structure nor parent education was a significant predictor. Depressive symptoms in young adolescents may be more strongly affected by the perception of emotional bonding in the family than by the particular family structure. Apparent effects of family structure are likely to be confounded by and a reflection of the level of perceived emotional bonding or cohesion. The strength of these associations varies across race and gender groups, perhaps reflecting differences in external events, extended family structures, and stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-281
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Research on Adolescence
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

family structure
group cohesion
Depression
adolescent
Epidemiologic Studies
parent education
female adolescent
Education
extended family
gender
African Americans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Parents
parents
event
interaction
evaluation
Object Attachment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents. / McKeown, Robert E.; Garrison, Carol Z.; Jackson, Kirby L.; Cuffe, Steven P.; Addy, Cheryl L.; Waller, Jennifer L.

In: Journal of Research on Adolescence, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 267-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McKeown, Robert E. ; Garrison, Carol Z. ; Jackson, Kirby L. ; Cuffe, Steven P. ; Addy, Cheryl L. ; Waller, Jennifer L. / Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents. In: Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1997 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 267-281.
@article{e63184d4d1bf4b8f8596aa6c8f18b9d9,
title = "Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents",
abstract = "This study assessed whether the presence of both natural parents in the home and the level of perceived emotional bonding in the family, as measured by the cohesion component of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, were independent predictors of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a diverse community sample of 3,191 young adolescents. In cross-sectional analysis, cohesion was significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for family structure and parent education, but there were significant interactions of cohesion with race and gender. Higher CES-D scores were associated with lower cohesion scores, with partial R2 values from 0.11 for African American female adolescents to 0.29 for White female adolescents. In longitudinal analysis, the Year 1 cohesion score explained only a small amount of the variance in Year 2 CES-D after controlling for Year 1 CES-D; however, the change in cohesion score from Year 1 to Year 2 was a significant predictor after controlling for baseline CES-D and cohesion scores. Neither family structure nor parent education was a significant predictor. Depressive symptoms in young adolescents may be more strongly affected by the perception of emotional bonding in the family than by the particular family structure. Apparent effects of family structure are likely to be confounded by and a reflection of the level of perceived emotional bonding or cohesion. The strength of these associations varies across race and gender groups, perhaps reflecting differences in external events, extended family structures, and stress.",
author = "McKeown, {Robert E.} and Garrison, {Carol Z.} and Jackson, {Kirby L.} and Cuffe, {Steven P.} and Addy, {Cheryl L.} and Waller, {Jennifer L}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327795jra0703_2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "267--281",
journal = "Journal of Research on Adolescence",
issn = "1050-8392",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents

AU - McKeown, Robert E.

AU - Garrison, Carol Z.

AU - Jackson, Kirby L.

AU - Cuffe, Steven P.

AU - Addy, Cheryl L.

AU - Waller, Jennifer L

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - This study assessed whether the presence of both natural parents in the home and the level of perceived emotional bonding in the family, as measured by the cohesion component of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, were independent predictors of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a diverse community sample of 3,191 young adolescents. In cross-sectional analysis, cohesion was significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for family structure and parent education, but there were significant interactions of cohesion with race and gender. Higher CES-D scores were associated with lower cohesion scores, with partial R2 values from 0.11 for African American female adolescents to 0.29 for White female adolescents. In longitudinal analysis, the Year 1 cohesion score explained only a small amount of the variance in Year 2 CES-D after controlling for Year 1 CES-D; however, the change in cohesion score from Year 1 to Year 2 was a significant predictor after controlling for baseline CES-D and cohesion scores. Neither family structure nor parent education was a significant predictor. Depressive symptoms in young adolescents may be more strongly affected by the perception of emotional bonding in the family than by the particular family structure. Apparent effects of family structure are likely to be confounded by and a reflection of the level of perceived emotional bonding or cohesion. The strength of these associations varies across race and gender groups, perhaps reflecting differences in external events, extended family structures, and stress.

AB - This study assessed whether the presence of both natural parents in the home and the level of perceived emotional bonding in the family, as measured by the cohesion component of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, were independent predictors of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a diverse community sample of 3,191 young adolescents. In cross-sectional analysis, cohesion was significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for family structure and parent education, but there were significant interactions of cohesion with race and gender. Higher CES-D scores were associated with lower cohesion scores, with partial R2 values from 0.11 for African American female adolescents to 0.29 for White female adolescents. In longitudinal analysis, the Year 1 cohesion score explained only a small amount of the variance in Year 2 CES-D after controlling for Year 1 CES-D; however, the change in cohesion score from Year 1 to Year 2 was a significant predictor after controlling for baseline CES-D and cohesion scores. Neither family structure nor parent education was a significant predictor. Depressive symptoms in young adolescents may be more strongly affected by the perception of emotional bonding in the family than by the particular family structure. Apparent effects of family structure are likely to be confounded by and a reflection of the level of perceived emotional bonding or cohesion. The strength of these associations varies across race and gender groups, perhaps reflecting differences in external events, extended family structures, and stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031488277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031488277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327795jra0703_2

DO - 10.1207/s15327795jra0703_2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031488277

VL - 7

SP - 267

EP - 281

JO - Journal of Research on Adolescence

JF - Journal of Research on Adolescence

SN - 1050-8392

IS - 3

ER -