Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice

Measuring Competency

Gwen Anderson, Anna C. Alt-White, Kendra L. Schaa, Andrea Monique Boyd, Christine E. Kasper

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim: To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self-confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses. Design: Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources: Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction. Procedures: Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4-point grading scale. Findings: Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low. Linking Evidence to Action: Most instruments assess self-perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge-focused test questions based on up-to-date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-175
Number of pages11
JournalWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nursing Education
Genomics
Psychometrics
Genome
Nursing Education Research
Nurses
Nursing Assessment
Information Storage and Retrieval
Reproducibility of Results
Curriculum
Nursing
Language
Students
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Competency
  • Genetic nursing
  • Genomic education
  • Genomic nursing
  • Instruments
  • Integrative review
  • Literature review
  • Measurement
  • Nursing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Anderson, G., Alt-White, A. C., Schaa, K. L., Boyd, A. M., & Kasper, C. E. (2015). Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 12(3), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12096

Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice : Measuring Competency. / Anderson, Gwen; Alt-White, Anna C.; Schaa, Kendra L.; Boyd, Andrea Monique; Kasper, Christine E.

In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 165-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Anderson, G, Alt-White, AC, Schaa, KL, Boyd, AM & Kasper, CE 2015, 'Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency', Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12096
Anderson, Gwen ; Alt-White, Anna C. ; Schaa, Kendra L. ; Boyd, Andrea Monique ; Kasper, Christine E. / Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice : Measuring Competency. In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 165-175.
@article{71458c87355649449fb9f7ccceacf6e3,
title = "Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency",
abstract = "Background: Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim: To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self-confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses. Design: Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources: Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction. Procedures: Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4-point grading scale. Findings: Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low. Linking Evidence to Action: Most instruments assess self-perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge-focused test questions based on up-to-date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed.",
keywords = "Assessment, Competency, Genetic nursing, Genomic education, Genomic nursing, Instruments, Integrative review, Literature review, Measurement, Nursing",
author = "Gwen Anderson and Alt-White, {Anna C.} and Schaa, {Kendra L.} and Boyd, {Andrea Monique} and Kasper, {Christine E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/wvn.12096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "165--175",
journal = "Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing",
issn = "1545-102X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice

T2 - Measuring Competency

AU - Anderson, Gwen

AU - Alt-White, Anna C.

AU - Schaa, Kendra L.

AU - Boyd, Andrea Monique

AU - Kasper, Christine E.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background: Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim: To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self-confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses. Design: Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources: Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction. Procedures: Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4-point grading scale. Findings: Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low. Linking Evidence to Action: Most instruments assess self-perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge-focused test questions based on up-to-date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed.

AB - Background: Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self-confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research. Aim: To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self-confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses. Design: Psychometric systematic review. Data Sources: Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction. Procedures: Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4-point grading scale. Findings: Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low. Linking Evidence to Action: Most instruments assess self-perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge-focused test questions based on up-to-date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed.

KW - Assessment

KW - Competency

KW - Genetic nursing

KW - Genomic education

KW - Genomic nursing

KW - Instruments

KW - Integrative review

KW - Literature review

KW - Measurement

KW - Nursing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930402661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930402661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/wvn.12096

DO - 10.1111/wvn.12096

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

SP - 165

EP - 175

JO - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

JF - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

SN - 1545-102X

IS - 3

ER -