Healthcare safety: The impact of disabling "safety" protocols

Meghan M. Dierks, Caprice K. Christian, Emilie M. Roth, Thomas B. Sheridan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

With increasing attention to patient safety, hospitals and other clinical facilities are developing practice guidelines and protocols with the specific intent of reducing harm to patients. However, the introduction of these protocols can have unanticipated negative consequences and if followed rigidly can become disabling. We use the manual count procedure that was designed to improve patient safety by reducing the likelihood of leaving an object (e.g., needle, sponge, or instrument) inside a patient body cavity during a surgical procedure to illustrate this point. Using results from a focus group of seven operating room nurses and an observational study of nine complex operations, we show that the count protocol has unanticipated negative consequences that need to be considered in evaluating the net positive gain in patient safety. The study highlights the importance of evaluating the overall impact of proposed protocols in assessing its potential benefits to patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-698
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans.
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Healthcare safety: The impact of disabling "safety" protocols'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this