TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare safety
T2 - The impact of disabling "safety" protocols
AU - Dierks, Meghan M.
AU - Christian, Caprice K.
AU - Roth, Emilie M.
AU - Sheridan, Thomas B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received May 17, 2004; revised July 27, 2004. This work was supported by a grant from the Healthcare Safety Research Institute, part of the Risk Management Foundation, Harvard Medical Institutions. This paper was recommended by the guest editors of this special issue.
PY - 2004/11
Y1 - 2004/11
N2 - With increasing attention to patient safety, hospitals and other clinical facilities are developing practice guidelines and protocols with the specific intent of reducing harm to patients. However, the introduction of these protocols can have unanticipated negative consequences and if followed rigidly can become disabling. We use the manual count procedure that was designed to improve patient safety by reducing the likelihood of leaving an object (e.g., needle, sponge, or instrument) inside a patient body cavity during a surgical procedure to illustrate this point. Using results from a focus group of seven operating room nurses and an observational study of nine complex operations, we show that the count protocol has unanticipated negative consequences that need to be considered in evaluating the net positive gain in patient safety. The study highlights the importance of evaluating the overall impact of proposed protocols in assessing its potential benefits to patient safety.
AB - With increasing attention to patient safety, hospitals and other clinical facilities are developing practice guidelines and protocols with the specific intent of reducing harm to patients. However, the introduction of these protocols can have unanticipated negative consequences and if followed rigidly can become disabling. We use the manual count procedure that was designed to improve patient safety by reducing the likelihood of leaving an object (e.g., needle, sponge, or instrument) inside a patient body cavity during a surgical procedure to illustrate this point. Using results from a focus group of seven operating room nurses and an observational study of nine complex operations, we show that the count protocol has unanticipated negative consequences that need to be considered in evaluating the net positive gain in patient safety. The study highlights the importance of evaluating the overall impact of proposed protocols in assessing its potential benefits to patient safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7444242803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7444242803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TSMCA.2004.836785
DO - 10.1109/TSMCA.2004.836785
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:7444242803
SN - 1083-4427
VL - 34
SP - 693
EP - 698
JO - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans.
JF - IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans.
IS - 6
ER -