Healthcare spending and utilization following antireflux surgery: examining costs and reasons for readmission

Kyle L. Kleppe, Yiwei Xu, Luke M. Funk, Xing Wang, Jeff A. Havlena, Jake A. Greenberg, Anne O. Lidor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: While clinical outcomes have been reported for anti-reflux surgery (ARS), there are limited data on post-operative encounters, including readmission, and their associated costs. This study evaluates healthcare utilization during the 90-day post-operative period following ARS including fundoplication and/or paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Truven Health MarketScan® Databases. Patients older than 16 years with an ICD-9 procedure code or Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) code for ARS and a primary diagnosis of GERD during 2012–2014 were selected. Healthcare spending and utilization on emergency department (ED) visits, performance of outpatient endoscopy, and readmission were examined. Reasons for readmission were classified based on ICD-9 code. Results: A total of 40,853 patients were included in the cohort with a mean age of 49 years and females comprising 76.0%. Mean length of stay was 1.4 days, and 93.0% of patients underwent a laparoscopic approach. The mean cost of the index surgical admission was $24,034. Readmission occurred in 4.2% of patients, and of those, 26.3% required a surgical intervention. Patients requiring one or more related readmissions accrued additional costs of $29,513. Some of the most common reasons for readmission were related to nutritional, metabolic, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Presentation to the ED occurred in 14.0% of patients, and outpatient upper endoscopy was required in 1.5% of patients, but with much lower associated costs as compared to readmission ($1175). Conclusion: The majority of patients undergoing ARS do not require additional care within 90 days of surgery. Patients who are readmitted accrue costs that almost double the overall cost of care compared to the initial hospitalization. Measures to attenuate potentially preventable readmissions after ARS may reduce healthcare utilization in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-248
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-reflux surgery
  • Costs
  • Healthcare utilization
  • Hiatal hernia
  • Paraesophageal hernia
  • Readmission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Healthcare spending and utilization following antireflux surgery: examining costs and reasons for readmission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this