Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment

Luana Severo Alves, Cristiano Susin, Nailê Damé-Teixeira, Marisa Maltz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and extent of dental caries according to the standard World Health Organization (WHO), modified WHO and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria among 12-year-old Brazilian schoolchildren and to assess the impact of these detection criteria on the assessment of sociodemographic risk indicators for dental caries. Methods: This cross-sectional survey used a multistage probability sampling strategy to select a representative sample of 12-year-old schoolchildren. After tooth cleaning and drying, a single examiner recorded the presence of non-cavitated and cavitated caries lesions. A questionnaire gathered demographic and socio-economic information. Three proposed thresholds for caries detection were used: standard WHO criteria (only cavitated lesions); modified WHO criteria (active non-cavitated lesions and cavitated lesions); and ICDAS (all non-cavitated and cavitated lesions). Prevalence ratios (PR), rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using survey Poisson regression analysis. Results: In total, 1,528 of 1,837 eligible schoolchildren participated. Caries prevalence (standard WHO, 55.23%; modified WHO, 63.33%; ICDAS, 79.82%) and decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index (standard WHO, 1.39; modified WHO, 1.95; ICDAS, 3.78) increased as the detection criteria became more sensitive. Compared with the standard WHO criteria, ICDAS had a greater impact on caries estimates, mainly in schoolchildren of higher socio-economic background. All socio-economic variables were significantly associated with dental caries, irrespective of the detection criteria. Conclusion: The inclusion of non-cavitated lesions impacted estimates of prevalence and extent of dental caries, mainly when ICDAS was used. No impact was observed on the association between caries and socio-economic variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-151
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Dental Journal
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dental Caries
Economics
DMF Index
Tooth
Cross-Sectional Studies
Regression Analysis
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Dental caries
  • diagnosis
  • epidemiology
  • prevalence
  • risk indicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment. / Alves, Luana Severo; Susin, Cristiano; Damé-Teixeira, Nailê; Maltz, Marisa.

In: International Dental Journal, Vol. 68, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 144-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alves, Luana Severo ; Susin, Cristiano ; Damé-Teixeira, Nailê ; Maltz, Marisa. / Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment. In: International Dental Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 144-151.
@article{40e2edea965e4182a7657293ea31d4fc,
title = "Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment",
abstract = "Aim: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and extent of dental caries according to the standard World Health Organization (WHO), modified WHO and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria among 12-year-old Brazilian schoolchildren and to assess the impact of these detection criteria on the assessment of sociodemographic risk indicators for dental caries. Methods: This cross-sectional survey used a multistage probability sampling strategy to select a representative sample of 12-year-old schoolchildren. After tooth cleaning and drying, a single examiner recorded the presence of non-cavitated and cavitated caries lesions. A questionnaire gathered demographic and socio-economic information. Three proposed thresholds for caries detection were used: standard WHO criteria (only cavitated lesions); modified WHO criteria (active non-cavitated lesions and cavitated lesions); and ICDAS (all non-cavitated and cavitated lesions). Prevalence ratios (PR), rate ratios (RR) and 95{\%} confidence intervals (95{\%} CI) were estimated using survey Poisson regression analysis. Results: In total, 1,528 of 1,837 eligible schoolchildren participated. Caries prevalence (standard WHO, 55.23{\%}; modified WHO, 63.33{\%}; ICDAS, 79.82{\%}) and decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index (standard WHO, 1.39; modified WHO, 1.95; ICDAS, 3.78) increased as the detection criteria became more sensitive. Compared with the standard WHO criteria, ICDAS had a greater impact on caries estimates, mainly in schoolchildren of higher socio-economic background. All socio-economic variables were significantly associated with dental caries, irrespective of the detection criteria. Conclusion: The inclusion of non-cavitated lesions impacted estimates of prevalence and extent of dental caries, mainly when ICDAS was used. No impact was observed on the association between caries and socio-economic variables.",
keywords = "Dental caries, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevalence, risk indicators",
author = "Alves, {Luana Severo} and Cristiano Susin and Nail{\^e} Dam{\'e}-Teixeira and Marisa Maltz",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/idj.12352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "144--151",
journal = "International Dental Journal",
issn = "0020-6539",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of different detection criteria on caries estimates and risk assessment

AU - Alves, Luana Severo

AU - Susin, Cristiano

AU - Damé-Teixeira, Nailê

AU - Maltz, Marisa

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Aim: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and extent of dental caries according to the standard World Health Organization (WHO), modified WHO and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria among 12-year-old Brazilian schoolchildren and to assess the impact of these detection criteria on the assessment of sociodemographic risk indicators for dental caries. Methods: This cross-sectional survey used a multistage probability sampling strategy to select a representative sample of 12-year-old schoolchildren. After tooth cleaning and drying, a single examiner recorded the presence of non-cavitated and cavitated caries lesions. A questionnaire gathered demographic and socio-economic information. Three proposed thresholds for caries detection were used: standard WHO criteria (only cavitated lesions); modified WHO criteria (active non-cavitated lesions and cavitated lesions); and ICDAS (all non-cavitated and cavitated lesions). Prevalence ratios (PR), rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using survey Poisson regression analysis. Results: In total, 1,528 of 1,837 eligible schoolchildren participated. Caries prevalence (standard WHO, 55.23%; modified WHO, 63.33%; ICDAS, 79.82%) and decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index (standard WHO, 1.39; modified WHO, 1.95; ICDAS, 3.78) increased as the detection criteria became more sensitive. Compared with the standard WHO criteria, ICDAS had a greater impact on caries estimates, mainly in schoolchildren of higher socio-economic background. All socio-economic variables were significantly associated with dental caries, irrespective of the detection criteria. Conclusion: The inclusion of non-cavitated lesions impacted estimates of prevalence and extent of dental caries, mainly when ICDAS was used. No impact was observed on the association between caries and socio-economic variables.

AB - Aim: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and extent of dental caries according to the standard World Health Organization (WHO), modified WHO and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria among 12-year-old Brazilian schoolchildren and to assess the impact of these detection criteria on the assessment of sociodemographic risk indicators for dental caries. Methods: This cross-sectional survey used a multistage probability sampling strategy to select a representative sample of 12-year-old schoolchildren. After tooth cleaning and drying, a single examiner recorded the presence of non-cavitated and cavitated caries lesions. A questionnaire gathered demographic and socio-economic information. Three proposed thresholds for caries detection were used: standard WHO criteria (only cavitated lesions); modified WHO criteria (active non-cavitated lesions and cavitated lesions); and ICDAS (all non-cavitated and cavitated lesions). Prevalence ratios (PR), rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using survey Poisson regression analysis. Results: In total, 1,528 of 1,837 eligible schoolchildren participated. Caries prevalence (standard WHO, 55.23%; modified WHO, 63.33%; ICDAS, 79.82%) and decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index (standard WHO, 1.39; modified WHO, 1.95; ICDAS, 3.78) increased as the detection criteria became more sensitive. Compared with the standard WHO criteria, ICDAS had a greater impact on caries estimates, mainly in schoolchildren of higher socio-economic background. All socio-economic variables were significantly associated with dental caries, irrespective of the detection criteria. Conclusion: The inclusion of non-cavitated lesions impacted estimates of prevalence and extent of dental caries, mainly when ICDAS was used. No impact was observed on the association between caries and socio-economic variables.

KW - Dental caries

KW - diagnosis

KW - epidemiology

KW - prevalence

KW - risk indicators

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048049794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048049794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/idj.12352

DO - 10.1111/idj.12352

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048049794

VL - 68

SP - 144

EP - 151

JO - International Dental Journal

JF - International Dental Journal

SN - 0020-6539

IS - 3

ER -