Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research

John G. McManus, Sumeru G. Mehta, Annette R. McClinton, Robert A. De Lorenzo, Toney W. Baskin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Informed consent in military research shares many of the same fundamental principles and regulations that govern civilian biomedical research. In fact, much of modern research ethics is grounded in events that occurred in the context of war or government-sponsored research. Despite these similarities and common origins, research in the military has additional requirements designed to preserve service members' informed consent rights. The special nature of the superior-subordinate relationship in the military necessitates careful protections to avoid perceptions of coercion or undue influence on a military subject. Additionally, current legal and regulatory requirements for advanced informed consent significantly restrict the flexibility of the military to conduct research using waiver of consent. This has implications on the ability of the nation to develop effective medical treatments for the global war on terrorism. Nevertheless, work is under way to realign defense research policy with the norms of civilian biomedical practice. Future directions include the adoption of waivers for military emergency research, and the cautious introduction of human subject studies on the battlefield. This paper discusses historical background, regulatory differences, and concerns and challenges of some of these regulatory differences for research personnel that apply to informed consent and waiver of said informed consent for emergency research conducted by the U.S. military.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1120-1126
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
Ethics
Biomedical Research
Research
Emergencies
Research Ethics
Coercion
Terrorism
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Department of Defense
  • Ethics
  • Informed consent
  • Military
  • Research
  • Waiver of consent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

McManus, J. G., Mehta, S. G., McClinton, A. R., De Lorenzo, R. A., & Baskin, T. W. (2005). Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research. Academic Emergency Medicine, 12(11), 1120-1126. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037

Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research. / McManus, John G.; Mehta, Sumeru G.; McClinton, Annette R.; De Lorenzo, Robert A.; Baskin, Toney W.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 11, 01.11.2005, p. 1120-1126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McManus, JG, Mehta, SG, McClinton, AR, De Lorenzo, RA & Baskin, TW 2005, 'Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1120-1126. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037
McManus, John G. ; Mehta, Sumeru G. ; McClinton, Annette R. ; De Lorenzo, Robert A. ; Baskin, Toney W. / Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 12, No. 11. pp. 1120-1126.
@article{8adc895a198b4316a5b9941857e45a92,
title = "Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research",
abstract = "Informed consent in military research shares many of the same fundamental principles and regulations that govern civilian biomedical research. In fact, much of modern research ethics is grounded in events that occurred in the context of war or government-sponsored research. Despite these similarities and common origins, research in the military has additional requirements designed to preserve service members' informed consent rights. The special nature of the superior-subordinate relationship in the military necessitates careful protections to avoid perceptions of coercion or undue influence on a military subject. Additionally, current legal and regulatory requirements for advanced informed consent significantly restrict the flexibility of the military to conduct research using waiver of consent. This has implications on the ability of the nation to develop effective medical treatments for the global war on terrorism. Nevertheless, work is under way to realign defense research policy with the norms of civilian biomedical practice. Future directions include the adoption of waivers for military emergency research, and the cautious introduction of human subject studies on the battlefield. This paper discusses historical background, regulatory differences, and concerns and challenges of some of these regulatory differences for research personnel that apply to informed consent and waiver of said informed consent for emergency research conducted by the U.S. military.",
keywords = "Department of Defense, Ethics, Informed consent, Military, Research, Waiver of consent",
author = "McManus, {John G.} and Mehta, {Sumeru G.} and McClinton, {Annette R.} and {De Lorenzo}, {Robert A.} and Baskin, {Toney W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1120--1126",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research

AU - McManus, John G.

AU - Mehta, Sumeru G.

AU - McClinton, Annette R.

AU - De Lorenzo, Robert A.

AU - Baskin, Toney W.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - Informed consent in military research shares many of the same fundamental principles and regulations that govern civilian biomedical research. In fact, much of modern research ethics is grounded in events that occurred in the context of war or government-sponsored research. Despite these similarities and common origins, research in the military has additional requirements designed to preserve service members' informed consent rights. The special nature of the superior-subordinate relationship in the military necessitates careful protections to avoid perceptions of coercion or undue influence on a military subject. Additionally, current legal and regulatory requirements for advanced informed consent significantly restrict the flexibility of the military to conduct research using waiver of consent. This has implications on the ability of the nation to develop effective medical treatments for the global war on terrorism. Nevertheless, work is under way to realign defense research policy with the norms of civilian biomedical practice. Future directions include the adoption of waivers for military emergency research, and the cautious introduction of human subject studies on the battlefield. This paper discusses historical background, regulatory differences, and concerns and challenges of some of these regulatory differences for research personnel that apply to informed consent and waiver of said informed consent for emergency research conducted by the U.S. military.

AB - Informed consent in military research shares many of the same fundamental principles and regulations that govern civilian biomedical research. In fact, much of modern research ethics is grounded in events that occurred in the context of war or government-sponsored research. Despite these similarities and common origins, research in the military has additional requirements designed to preserve service members' informed consent rights. The special nature of the superior-subordinate relationship in the military necessitates careful protections to avoid perceptions of coercion or undue influence on a military subject. Additionally, current legal and regulatory requirements for advanced informed consent significantly restrict the flexibility of the military to conduct research using waiver of consent. This has implications on the ability of the nation to develop effective medical treatments for the global war on terrorism. Nevertheless, work is under way to realign defense research policy with the norms of civilian biomedical practice. Future directions include the adoption of waivers for military emergency research, and the cautious introduction of human subject studies on the battlefield. This paper discusses historical background, regulatory differences, and concerns and challenges of some of these regulatory differences for research personnel that apply to informed consent and waiver of said informed consent for emergency research conducted by the U.S. military.

KW - Department of Defense

KW - Ethics

KW - Informed consent

KW - Military

KW - Research

KW - Waiver of consent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144508751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144508751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037

M3 - Article

C2 - 16264083

AN - SCOPUS:27144508751

VL - 12

SP - 1120

EP - 1126

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -