Interview from anywhere

Feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process

Sumanth Reddy Daram, Ruonan Wu, Shou Jiang Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Traditional personal interviews are subject to limitations imposed by geographic, financial, and scheduling constraints. Web-based videoconferencing (WVC) has the potential to simplify the interview process. This study was intended to evaluate the feasibility and utility of WVC using standard tablets/computers with videoconferencing capability in gastroenterology (GI) fellowship interviews.METHODS:At a single institution, 16 GI fellowship applicants participated in WVC with one interviewer, who was present at a remote location 750 miles away. In addition, each of the candidates underwent traditional interviews with four faculty members at the program site. All study interviewees used an iPad2 (Apple, iOS 5.1; Apple) with a videoconferencing application (Facetime). The interviewer (SRD) used Facetime on a MacBook Pro (Apple, Mac OS X 10.7.3). Each candidate completed a voluntary paper survey after completion of all assigned faculty interviews.RESULTS:The average age of the candidates was 30 years (range, 27-37 years). Fourteen candidates were native English speakers. Candidates expressed a high level of satisfaction, with 13 candidates (81%) stating that their WVC experience met or exceeded their expectations, and 87% of candidates stating that WVC should be an option in fellowship interviews. In addition, 25% of candidates felt that their WVC experience was equivalent to or better than their traditional interview experience on the same day.CONCLUSIONS:WVC can be an effective and useful tool in the fellowship interview process. It affords candidates increased flexibility, cost saving, convenience, and provides an option for participating in the selection process at more programs. For the programs and faculty, WVC has a potential to be an effective screening tool, can help minimize loss of clinical revenue and can also be an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-159
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

Videoconferencing
Gastroenterology
Interviews
Malus
Handheld Computers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Interview from anywhere : Feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process. / Daram, Sumanth Reddy; Wu, Ruonan; Tang, Shou Jiang.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 109, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 155-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acff7f3e37d849fda89dd0766e8544ca,
title = "Interview from anywhere: Feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES:Traditional personal interviews are subject to limitations imposed by geographic, financial, and scheduling constraints. Web-based videoconferencing (WVC) has the potential to simplify the interview process. This study was intended to evaluate the feasibility and utility of WVC using standard tablets/computers with videoconferencing capability in gastroenterology (GI) fellowship interviews.METHODS:At a single institution, 16 GI fellowship applicants participated in WVC with one interviewer, who was present at a remote location 750 miles away. In addition, each of the candidates underwent traditional interviews with four faculty members at the program site. All study interviewees used an iPad2 (Apple, iOS 5.1; Apple) with a videoconferencing application (Facetime). The interviewer (SRD) used Facetime on a MacBook Pro (Apple, Mac OS X 10.7.3). Each candidate completed a voluntary paper survey after completion of all assigned faculty interviews.RESULTS:The average age of the candidates was 30 years (range, 27-37 years). Fourteen candidates were native English speakers. Candidates expressed a high level of satisfaction, with 13 candidates (81{\%}) stating that their WVC experience met or exceeded their expectations, and 87{\%} of candidates stating that WVC should be an option in fellowship interviews. In addition, 25{\%} of candidates felt that their WVC experience was equivalent to or better than their traditional interview experience on the same day.CONCLUSIONS:WVC can be an effective and useful tool in the fellowship interview process. It affords candidates increased flexibility, cost saving, convenience, and provides an option for participating in the selection process at more programs. For the programs and faculty, WVC has a potential to be an effective screening tool, can help minimize loss of clinical revenue and can also be an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews.",
author = "Daram, {Sumanth Reddy} and Ruonan Wu and Tang, {Shou Jiang}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2013.278",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "155--159",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interview from anywhere

T2 - Feasibility and utility of web-based videoconference interviews in the gastroenterology fellowship selection process

AU - Daram, Sumanth Reddy

AU - Wu, Ruonan

AU - Tang, Shou Jiang

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES:Traditional personal interviews are subject to limitations imposed by geographic, financial, and scheduling constraints. Web-based videoconferencing (WVC) has the potential to simplify the interview process. This study was intended to evaluate the feasibility and utility of WVC using standard tablets/computers with videoconferencing capability in gastroenterology (GI) fellowship interviews.METHODS:At a single institution, 16 GI fellowship applicants participated in WVC with one interviewer, who was present at a remote location 750 miles away. In addition, each of the candidates underwent traditional interviews with four faculty members at the program site. All study interviewees used an iPad2 (Apple, iOS 5.1; Apple) with a videoconferencing application (Facetime). The interviewer (SRD) used Facetime on a MacBook Pro (Apple, Mac OS X 10.7.3). Each candidate completed a voluntary paper survey after completion of all assigned faculty interviews.RESULTS:The average age of the candidates was 30 years (range, 27-37 years). Fourteen candidates were native English speakers. Candidates expressed a high level of satisfaction, with 13 candidates (81%) stating that their WVC experience met or exceeded their expectations, and 87% of candidates stating that WVC should be an option in fellowship interviews. In addition, 25% of candidates felt that their WVC experience was equivalent to or better than their traditional interview experience on the same day.CONCLUSIONS:WVC can be an effective and useful tool in the fellowship interview process. It affords candidates increased flexibility, cost saving, convenience, and provides an option for participating in the selection process at more programs. For the programs and faculty, WVC has a potential to be an effective screening tool, can help minimize loss of clinical revenue and can also be an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews.

AB - OBJECTIVES:Traditional personal interviews are subject to limitations imposed by geographic, financial, and scheduling constraints. Web-based videoconferencing (WVC) has the potential to simplify the interview process. This study was intended to evaluate the feasibility and utility of WVC using standard tablets/computers with videoconferencing capability in gastroenterology (GI) fellowship interviews.METHODS:At a single institution, 16 GI fellowship applicants participated in WVC with one interviewer, who was present at a remote location 750 miles away. In addition, each of the candidates underwent traditional interviews with four faculty members at the program site. All study interviewees used an iPad2 (Apple, iOS 5.1; Apple) with a videoconferencing application (Facetime). The interviewer (SRD) used Facetime on a MacBook Pro (Apple, Mac OS X 10.7.3). Each candidate completed a voluntary paper survey after completion of all assigned faculty interviews.RESULTS:The average age of the candidates was 30 years (range, 27-37 years). Fourteen candidates were native English speakers. Candidates expressed a high level of satisfaction, with 13 candidates (81%) stating that their WVC experience met or exceeded their expectations, and 87% of candidates stating that WVC should be an option in fellowship interviews. In addition, 25% of candidates felt that their WVC experience was equivalent to or better than their traditional interview experience on the same day.CONCLUSIONS:WVC can be an effective and useful tool in the fellowship interview process. It affords candidates increased flexibility, cost saving, convenience, and provides an option for participating in the selection process at more programs. For the programs and faculty, WVC has a potential to be an effective screening tool, can help minimize loss of clinical revenue and can also be an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893796514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893796514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2013.278

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2013.278

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 155

EP - 159

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 2

ER -