Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans

Mohammad Seyyedi, Joseph B. Nadol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: This study evaluates the types and degrees of tissue response adjacent to the electrode of multichannel co-chlear implants.

Background: Cochlear implant electrodes have been classified as biocompatible prostheses. Nevertheless, in some reports, electrode extrusion, chronic inflammation, and even soft failure of the implant system have been attributed to a tissue response to the electrode.

Methods: All celloidin-embedded temporal bones with multichannel cochlear implants from the temporal bone collection of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were included in the study. A total of 28 temporal bones from 21 subjects were identified and processed for histology. The severity of cellular response including eosinophil and lymphocytic infiltration, giant cell reaction, new bone formation, and fibrosis were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 at three 1-mm segments along the electrode: first 1 mm at the cochleostomy, last 1 mm from the tip of the electrode, and midway between these proximal and distal segments. The values were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results: A granulomatous reaction to the electrode was observed in 27 (96.4%) temporal bones. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 7 (25%) temporal bones, suggesting an allergic reaction. The Inflammatory response to the electrode was significantly greater at the basal turn of cochlea close to the cochleostomy (p > 0.05) than distal to it.

Conclusion: An inflammatory response is common after co-chlear implantation, and it is more robust at the cochleos-tomy than distal to it, suggesting the role of trauma of insertion as a contributing factor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1545-1551
Number of pages7
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Electrodes
Temporal Bone
Eosinophils
Collodion
Cochlea
Giant Cells
Osteogenesis
Prostheses and Implants
Ear
Histology
Hypersensitivity
Fibrosis
Inflammation
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Cochlear implantV Endocochlear
  • Foreign body
  • Giant cell
  • LabyrinthitisV Tissue response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans. / Seyyedi, Mohammad; Nadol, Joseph B.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 35, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 1545-1551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c942540305fb4b20a894d2608df9e4e4,
title = "Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans",
abstract = "Hypothesis: This study evaluates the types and degrees of tissue response adjacent to the electrode of multichannel co-chlear implants.Background: Cochlear implant electrodes have been classified as biocompatible prostheses. Nevertheless, in some reports, electrode extrusion, chronic inflammation, and even soft failure of the implant system have been attributed to a tissue response to the electrode.Methods: All celloidin-embedded temporal bones with multichannel cochlear implants from the temporal bone collection of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were included in the study. A total of 28 temporal bones from 21 subjects were identified and processed for histology. The severity of cellular response including eosinophil and lymphocytic infiltration, giant cell reaction, new bone formation, and fibrosis were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 at three 1-mm segments along the electrode: first 1 mm at the cochleostomy, last 1 mm from the tip of the electrode, and midway between these proximal and distal segments. The values were compared using the Wilcoxon test.Results: A granulomatous reaction to the electrode was observed in 27 (96.4{\%}) temporal bones. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 7 (25{\%}) temporal bones, suggesting an allergic reaction. The Inflammatory response to the electrode was significantly greater at the basal turn of cochlea close to the cochleostomy (p > 0.05) than distal to it.Conclusion: An inflammatory response is common after co-chlear implantation, and it is more robust at the cochleos-tomy than distal to it, suggesting the role of trauma of insertion as a contributing factor.",
keywords = "Cochlear implantV Endocochlear, Foreign body, Giant cell, LabyrinthitisV Tissue response",
author = "Mohammad Seyyedi and Nadol, {Joseph B.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0000000000000540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1545--1551",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intracochlear inflammatory response to cochlear implant electrodes in humans

AU - Seyyedi, Mohammad

AU - Nadol, Joseph B.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Hypothesis: This study evaluates the types and degrees of tissue response adjacent to the electrode of multichannel co-chlear implants.Background: Cochlear implant electrodes have been classified as biocompatible prostheses. Nevertheless, in some reports, electrode extrusion, chronic inflammation, and even soft failure of the implant system have been attributed to a tissue response to the electrode.Methods: All celloidin-embedded temporal bones with multichannel cochlear implants from the temporal bone collection of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were included in the study. A total of 28 temporal bones from 21 subjects were identified and processed for histology. The severity of cellular response including eosinophil and lymphocytic infiltration, giant cell reaction, new bone formation, and fibrosis were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 at three 1-mm segments along the electrode: first 1 mm at the cochleostomy, last 1 mm from the tip of the electrode, and midway between these proximal and distal segments. The values were compared using the Wilcoxon test.Results: A granulomatous reaction to the electrode was observed in 27 (96.4%) temporal bones. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 7 (25%) temporal bones, suggesting an allergic reaction. The Inflammatory response to the electrode was significantly greater at the basal turn of cochlea close to the cochleostomy (p > 0.05) than distal to it.Conclusion: An inflammatory response is common after co-chlear implantation, and it is more robust at the cochleos-tomy than distal to it, suggesting the role of trauma of insertion as a contributing factor.

AB - Hypothesis: This study evaluates the types and degrees of tissue response adjacent to the electrode of multichannel co-chlear implants.Background: Cochlear implant electrodes have been classified as biocompatible prostheses. Nevertheless, in some reports, electrode extrusion, chronic inflammation, and even soft failure of the implant system have been attributed to a tissue response to the electrode.Methods: All celloidin-embedded temporal bones with multichannel cochlear implants from the temporal bone collection of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were included in the study. A total of 28 temporal bones from 21 subjects were identified and processed for histology. The severity of cellular response including eosinophil and lymphocytic infiltration, giant cell reaction, new bone formation, and fibrosis were scored on a scale from 0 to 3 at three 1-mm segments along the electrode: first 1 mm at the cochleostomy, last 1 mm from the tip of the electrode, and midway between these proximal and distal segments. The values were compared using the Wilcoxon test.Results: A granulomatous reaction to the electrode was observed in 27 (96.4%) temporal bones. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 7 (25%) temporal bones, suggesting an allergic reaction. The Inflammatory response to the electrode was significantly greater at the basal turn of cochlea close to the cochleostomy (p > 0.05) than distal to it.Conclusion: An inflammatory response is common after co-chlear implantation, and it is more robust at the cochleos-tomy than distal to it, suggesting the role of trauma of insertion as a contributing factor.

KW - Cochlear implantV Endocochlear

KW - Foreign body

KW - Giant cell

KW - LabyrinthitisV Tissue response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914096126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914096126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000540

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000540

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1545

EP - 1551

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 9

ER -