Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process?

Domenico Ricucci, Simona Loghin, Louis M. Lin, Larz S W Spångberg, Franklin Chi Meng Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Conceptually, two types of tertiary dentine may be produced in response to caries and environmental irritations: "reactionary dentine" that is secreted by existing primary odontoblasts and "reparative dentine", formed after the death of the odontoblasts by proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells into odontoblast-like cells. Because histologic evidence for tubular dentine generated by newly differentiated odontoblast-like cells is lacking in human teeth, the present study examined pulpal cellular changes associated with caries/restorations, in the presence or absence of pulpal exposures. Methods Ninety-six extracted human teeth were histologically processed and serial sectioned for light microscopy: 65 contained untreated enamel/dentine caries; 20 were heavily restored and 11 had carious exposures managed by direct pulp-capping. Results Sparsely distributed, irregularly arranged dentinal tubules were identified from the tertiary dentine formed in teeth with unexposed medium/deep caries and in restored teeth; those tubules were continuous with the tubules of secondary dentine; in some cases, tubules were absent. The palisade odontoblast layer was reduced to a single layer of flattened cells. In direct pulp-capping of pulp exposures, the defects were repaired by the deposition of an amorphous dystrophic calcified tissue that resembled pulp stones more than dentine, sometimes entrapping pulpal remnants. This atubular hard tissue was lined by fibroblasts and collagen fibrils. Conclusions Histological evidence from the present study indicates that reparative dentinogenesis cannot be considered as a regenerative process since the so-formed hard tissue lacks tubular features characteristic of genuine dentine. Rather, this process represents a repair response that produces calcified scar tissues by pulpal fibroblasts. Clinical significance Formation of hard tissue in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts has often been regarded by clinicians as regeneration of dentine. If the objective of the clinical procedures involved is to induce healing, reduce dentine hypersensitivity, or minimise future bacteria exposure, such procedures may be regarded as clinical success. However, current clinical treatment procedures are not adept at regenerating physiological dentne because the tissues formed in the dental pulp are more likely the result of repair responses via the formation of calcified scar tissues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1156-1170
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume42
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Odontoblasts
Dental Pulp
Dentin
Tooth
Dental Pulp Capping
Cicatrix
Secondary Dentin
Dentinogenesis
Dental Pulp Calcification
Fibroblasts
Dentin Sensitivity
Dental Enamel
Regeneration
Microscopy
Collagen
Stem Cells
Bacteria
Light

Keywords

  • Dental caries
  • Odontoblast
  • Pulp capping
  • Reactionary dentine
  • Regenerative dentinogenesis
  • Reparative dentine
  • Tertiary dentine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process? / Ricucci, Domenico; Loghin, Simona; Lin, Louis M.; Spångberg, Larz S W; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 42, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 1156-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ricucci, Domenico ; Loghin, Simona ; Lin, Louis M. ; Spångberg, Larz S W ; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng. / Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process?. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2014 ; Vol. 42, No. 9. pp. 1156-1170.
@article{2fdf40a0f586484b81a01c835dc97d00,
title = "Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process?",
abstract = "Objectives Conceptually, two types of tertiary dentine may be produced in response to caries and environmental irritations: {"}reactionary dentine{"} that is secreted by existing primary odontoblasts and {"}reparative dentine{"}, formed after the death of the odontoblasts by proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells into odontoblast-like cells. Because histologic evidence for tubular dentine generated by newly differentiated odontoblast-like cells is lacking in human teeth, the present study examined pulpal cellular changes associated with caries/restorations, in the presence or absence of pulpal exposures. Methods Ninety-six extracted human teeth were histologically processed and serial sectioned for light microscopy: 65 contained untreated enamel/dentine caries; 20 were heavily restored and 11 had carious exposures managed by direct pulp-capping. Results Sparsely distributed, irregularly arranged dentinal tubules were identified from the tertiary dentine formed in teeth with unexposed medium/deep caries and in restored teeth; those tubules were continuous with the tubules of secondary dentine; in some cases, tubules were absent. The palisade odontoblast layer was reduced to a single layer of flattened cells. In direct pulp-capping of pulp exposures, the defects were repaired by the deposition of an amorphous dystrophic calcified tissue that resembled pulp stones more than dentine, sometimes entrapping pulpal remnants. This atubular hard tissue was lined by fibroblasts and collagen fibrils. Conclusions Histological evidence from the present study indicates that reparative dentinogenesis cannot be considered as a regenerative process since the so-formed hard tissue lacks tubular features characteristic of genuine dentine. Rather, this process represents a repair response that produces calcified scar tissues by pulpal fibroblasts. Clinical significance Formation of hard tissue in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts has often been regarded by clinicians as regeneration of dentine. If the objective of the clinical procedures involved is to induce healing, reduce dentine hypersensitivity, or minimise future bacteria exposure, such procedures may be regarded as clinical success. However, current clinical treatment procedures are not adept at regenerating physiological dentne because the tissues formed in the dental pulp are more likely the result of repair responses via the formation of calcified scar tissues.",
keywords = "Dental caries, Odontoblast, Pulp capping, Reactionary dentine, Regenerative dentinogenesis, Reparative dentine, Tertiary dentine",
author = "Domenico Ricucci and Simona Loghin and Lin, {Louis M.} and Sp{\aa}ngberg, {Larz S W} and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1156--1170",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process?

AU - Ricucci, Domenico

AU - Loghin, Simona

AU - Lin, Louis M.

AU - Spångberg, Larz S W

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objectives Conceptually, two types of tertiary dentine may be produced in response to caries and environmental irritations: "reactionary dentine" that is secreted by existing primary odontoblasts and "reparative dentine", formed after the death of the odontoblasts by proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells into odontoblast-like cells. Because histologic evidence for tubular dentine generated by newly differentiated odontoblast-like cells is lacking in human teeth, the present study examined pulpal cellular changes associated with caries/restorations, in the presence or absence of pulpal exposures. Methods Ninety-six extracted human teeth were histologically processed and serial sectioned for light microscopy: 65 contained untreated enamel/dentine caries; 20 were heavily restored and 11 had carious exposures managed by direct pulp-capping. Results Sparsely distributed, irregularly arranged dentinal tubules were identified from the tertiary dentine formed in teeth with unexposed medium/deep caries and in restored teeth; those tubules were continuous with the tubules of secondary dentine; in some cases, tubules were absent. The palisade odontoblast layer was reduced to a single layer of flattened cells. In direct pulp-capping of pulp exposures, the defects were repaired by the deposition of an amorphous dystrophic calcified tissue that resembled pulp stones more than dentine, sometimes entrapping pulpal remnants. This atubular hard tissue was lined by fibroblasts and collagen fibrils. Conclusions Histological evidence from the present study indicates that reparative dentinogenesis cannot be considered as a regenerative process since the so-formed hard tissue lacks tubular features characteristic of genuine dentine. Rather, this process represents a repair response that produces calcified scar tissues by pulpal fibroblasts. Clinical significance Formation of hard tissue in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts has often been regarded by clinicians as regeneration of dentine. If the objective of the clinical procedures involved is to induce healing, reduce dentine hypersensitivity, or minimise future bacteria exposure, such procedures may be regarded as clinical success. However, current clinical treatment procedures are not adept at regenerating physiological dentne because the tissues formed in the dental pulp are more likely the result of repair responses via the formation of calcified scar tissues.

AB - Objectives Conceptually, two types of tertiary dentine may be produced in response to caries and environmental irritations: "reactionary dentine" that is secreted by existing primary odontoblasts and "reparative dentine", formed after the death of the odontoblasts by proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells into odontoblast-like cells. Because histologic evidence for tubular dentine generated by newly differentiated odontoblast-like cells is lacking in human teeth, the present study examined pulpal cellular changes associated with caries/restorations, in the presence or absence of pulpal exposures. Methods Ninety-six extracted human teeth were histologically processed and serial sectioned for light microscopy: 65 contained untreated enamel/dentine caries; 20 were heavily restored and 11 had carious exposures managed by direct pulp-capping. Results Sparsely distributed, irregularly arranged dentinal tubules were identified from the tertiary dentine formed in teeth with unexposed medium/deep caries and in restored teeth; those tubules were continuous with the tubules of secondary dentine; in some cases, tubules were absent. The palisade odontoblast layer was reduced to a single layer of flattened cells. In direct pulp-capping of pulp exposures, the defects were repaired by the deposition of an amorphous dystrophic calcified tissue that resembled pulp stones more than dentine, sometimes entrapping pulpal remnants. This atubular hard tissue was lined by fibroblasts and collagen fibrils. Conclusions Histological evidence from the present study indicates that reparative dentinogenesis cannot be considered as a regenerative process since the so-formed hard tissue lacks tubular features characteristic of genuine dentine. Rather, this process represents a repair response that produces calcified scar tissues by pulpal fibroblasts. Clinical significance Formation of hard tissue in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts has often been regarded by clinicians as regeneration of dentine. If the objective of the clinical procedures involved is to induce healing, reduce dentine hypersensitivity, or minimise future bacteria exposure, such procedures may be regarded as clinical success. However, current clinical treatment procedures are not adept at regenerating physiological dentne because the tissues formed in the dental pulp are more likely the result of repair responses via the formation of calcified scar tissues.

KW - Dental caries

KW - Odontoblast

KW - Pulp capping

KW - Reactionary dentine

KW - Regenerative dentinogenesis

KW - Reparative dentine

KW - Tertiary dentine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906252253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906252253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 25008021

AN - SCOPUS:84906252253

VL - 42

SP - 1156

EP - 1170

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 9

ER -