Judge gender, critical mass, and decision making in the appellate courts of Canada

Susan W. Johnson, Donald R. Songer, Nadia Anne Jilani-Hyler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, we explore gendered patterns of voting, and whether such patterns appear only after a critical mass of female justices is reached by analyzing the votes of justices in the Supreme Court of Canada. We employ a logistic regression model of the differences in the voting behavior of male versus female justices, using the universe of Supreme Court votes from 1982 through 2007. Our analysis supports the conclusion that women vote more liberally on civil rights, equality, and private economic cases, and more conservatively on criminal cases. However, we find no evidence that indicates a need for a critical mass of women justices for them to vote their sincere preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-260
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Women, Politics and Policy
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

appellate court
voter
justice
Canada
decision making
gender
Supreme Court
voting behavior
civil rights
voting
equality
logistics
regression
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Appellate courts
  • Canadian courts
  • Critical mass
  • Gendered voting
  • Judge gender
  • Judicial decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Judge gender, critical mass, and decision making in the appellate courts of Canada. / Johnson, Susan W.; Songer, Donald R.; Jilani-Hyler, Nadia Anne.

In: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.07.2011, p. 237-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8783245bf86b45a9bba76820239b5c56,
title = "Judge gender, critical mass, and decision making in the appellate courts of Canada",
abstract = "In this study, we explore gendered patterns of voting, and whether such patterns appear only after a critical mass of female justices is reached by analyzing the votes of justices in the Supreme Court of Canada. We employ a logistic regression model of the differences in the voting behavior of male versus female justices, using the universe of Supreme Court votes from 1982 through 2007. Our analysis supports the conclusion that women vote more liberally on civil rights, equality, and private economic cases, and more conservatively on criminal cases. However, we find no evidence that indicates a need for a critical mass of women justices for them to vote their sincere preferences.",
keywords = "Appellate courts, Canadian courts, Critical mass, Gendered voting, Judge gender, Judicial decision-making",
author = "Johnson, {Susan W.} and Songer, {Donald R.} and Jilani-Hyler, {Nadia Anne}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1554477X.2011.589293",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "237--260",
journal = "Journal of Women, Politics and Policy",
issn = "1554-477X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judge gender, critical mass, and decision making in the appellate courts of Canada

AU - Johnson, Susan W.

AU - Songer, Donald R.

AU - Jilani-Hyler, Nadia Anne

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - In this study, we explore gendered patterns of voting, and whether such patterns appear only after a critical mass of female justices is reached by analyzing the votes of justices in the Supreme Court of Canada. We employ a logistic regression model of the differences in the voting behavior of male versus female justices, using the universe of Supreme Court votes from 1982 through 2007. Our analysis supports the conclusion that women vote more liberally on civil rights, equality, and private economic cases, and more conservatively on criminal cases. However, we find no evidence that indicates a need for a critical mass of women justices for them to vote their sincere preferences.

AB - In this study, we explore gendered patterns of voting, and whether such patterns appear only after a critical mass of female justices is reached by analyzing the votes of justices in the Supreme Court of Canada. We employ a logistic regression model of the differences in the voting behavior of male versus female justices, using the universe of Supreme Court votes from 1982 through 2007. Our analysis supports the conclusion that women vote more liberally on civil rights, equality, and private economic cases, and more conservatively on criminal cases. However, we find no evidence that indicates a need for a critical mass of women justices for them to vote their sincere preferences.

KW - Appellate courts

KW - Canadian courts

KW - Critical mass

KW - Gendered voting

KW - Judge gender

KW - Judicial decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960514651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960514651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1554477X.2011.589293

DO - 10.1080/1554477X.2011.589293

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960514651

VL - 32

SP - 237

EP - 260

JO - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

JF - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

SN - 1554-477X

IS - 3

ER -