Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

Outcomes and efficacy

Hena Waseem, Scott J. Raffa, Selim R. Benbadis, Fernando Vale Diaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30-60% improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced >. 60%, and one noted <. 30%. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-113
Number of pages4
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Reoperation
Epilepsy
Anticonvulsants
Quality of Life
Lead
Seizures

Keywords

  • Epilepsy surgery
  • Intractable epilepsy
  • Lead revision
  • Seizure disorder
  • Vagus nerve stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy : Outcomes and efficacy. / Waseem, Hena; Raffa, Scott J.; Benbadis, Selim R.; Vale Diaz, Fernando.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 31, 01.02.2014, p. 110-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Waseem, Hena ; Raffa, Scott J. ; Benbadis, Selim R. ; Vale Diaz, Fernando. / Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy : Outcomes and efficacy. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2014 ; Vol. 31. pp. 110-113.
@article{0ba6d06caf564a87a09c420f193f0c3d,
title = "Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy: Outcomes and efficacy",
abstract = "We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30-60{\%} improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced >. 60{\%}, and one noted <. 30{\%}. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.",
keywords = "Epilepsy surgery, Intractable epilepsy, Lead revision, Seizure disorder, Vagus nerve stimulation",
author = "Hena Waseem and Raffa, {Scott J.} and Benbadis, {Selim R.} and {Vale Diaz}, Fernando",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "110--113",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lead revision surgery for vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

T2 - Outcomes and efficacy

AU - Waseem, Hena

AU - Raffa, Scott J.

AU - Benbadis, Selim R.

AU - Vale Diaz, Fernando

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30-60% improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced >. 60%, and one noted <. 30%. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.

AB - We present, to our knowledge, the first published analysis of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lead revisions to incorporate quality of life, clinical response, and antiepileptic drug (AED) burden in postrevision clinical outcomes. Ten patients were followed and had no postoperative complications. Seven patients had improvement in quality of life, and three experienced no change. Eight patients noted a restoration of clinical response comparable with initial VNS implantation. Seven patients reported 30-60% improvement in seizure reduction, two experienced >. 60%, and one noted <. 30%. Six patients had no change in AED burden. Vagus nerve stimulation lead revision should be considered a safe option for patients with VNS lead failure and medically intractable epilepsy.

KW - Epilepsy surgery

KW - Intractable epilepsy

KW - Lead revision

KW - Seizure disorder

KW - Vagus nerve stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891651557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891651557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 110

EP - 113

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

ER -