Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs

Steven K. Erickson, J. Richard Ciccone, Steven B. Schwarzkopf, J. Steven Lamberti, Michael J Vitacco

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Advances in the biological sciences have dramatically improved the understanding of schizophrenia and related psychotic illnesses. One of the most compelling findings is the substantial degree to which cognition is impaired in these illnesses and the remedial effects that antipsychotic drugs have in treating these cognitive impairments. Despite these promising discoveries, legal cases and scholarship remain replete with pejorative associations with antipsychotic drug action. References to antipsychotic medications as mind-altering drugs and their effects as "synthetic sanity" misconstrue the beneficial effects these medicines have on cognition. We review the prevailing legal attitude of antipsychotic medications and contrast these views with prevailing scientific knowledge. We conclude that legal opinion is misinformed about the effects of antipsychotic medications on cognition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-246
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jul 31 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Antipsychotic Agents
Cognition
Biological Science Disciplines
Schizophrenia
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Erickson, S. K., Ciccone, J. R., Schwarzkopf, S. B., Lamberti, J. S., & Vitacco, M. J. (2007). Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35(2), 235-246.

Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs. / Erickson, Steven K.; Ciccone, J. Richard; Schwarzkopf, Steven B.; Lamberti, J. Steven; Vitacco, Michael J.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 35, No. 2, 31.07.2007, p. 235-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Erickson, SK, Ciccone, JR, Schwarzkopf, SB, Lamberti, JS & Vitacco, MJ 2007, 'Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs', Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 235-246.
Erickson SK, Ciccone JR, Schwarzkopf SB, Lamberti JS, Vitacco MJ. Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2007 Jul 31;35(2):235-246.
Erickson, Steven K. ; Ciccone, J. Richard ; Schwarzkopf, Steven B. ; Lamberti, J. Steven ; Vitacco, Michael J. / Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs. In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2007 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 235-246.
@article{d0717c1a3d614dad9a6ef1c7dab2cf65,
title = "Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs",
abstract = "Advances in the biological sciences have dramatically improved the understanding of schizophrenia and related psychotic illnesses. One of the most compelling findings is the substantial degree to which cognition is impaired in these illnesses and the remedial effects that antipsychotic drugs have in treating these cognitive impairments. Despite these promising discoveries, legal cases and scholarship remain replete with pejorative associations with antipsychotic drug action. References to antipsychotic medications as mind-altering drugs and their effects as {"}synthetic sanity{"} misconstrue the beneficial effects these medicines have on cognition. We review the prevailing legal attitude of antipsychotic medications and contrast these views with prevailing scientific knowledge. We conclude that legal opinion is misinformed about the effects of antipsychotic medications on cognition.",
author = "Erickson, {Steven K.} and Ciccone, {J. Richard} and Schwarzkopf, {Steven B.} and Lamberti, {J. Steven} and Vitacco, {Michael J}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "31",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "235--246",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal fallacies of antipsychotic drugs

AU - Erickson, Steven K.

AU - Ciccone, J. Richard

AU - Schwarzkopf, Steven B.

AU - Lamberti, J. Steven

AU - Vitacco, Michael J

PY - 2007/7/31

Y1 - 2007/7/31

N2 - Advances in the biological sciences have dramatically improved the understanding of schizophrenia and related psychotic illnesses. One of the most compelling findings is the substantial degree to which cognition is impaired in these illnesses and the remedial effects that antipsychotic drugs have in treating these cognitive impairments. Despite these promising discoveries, legal cases and scholarship remain replete with pejorative associations with antipsychotic drug action. References to antipsychotic medications as mind-altering drugs and their effects as "synthetic sanity" misconstrue the beneficial effects these medicines have on cognition. We review the prevailing legal attitude of antipsychotic medications and contrast these views with prevailing scientific knowledge. We conclude that legal opinion is misinformed about the effects of antipsychotic medications on cognition.

AB - Advances in the biological sciences have dramatically improved the understanding of schizophrenia and related psychotic illnesses. One of the most compelling findings is the substantial degree to which cognition is impaired in these illnesses and the remedial effects that antipsychotic drugs have in treating these cognitive impairments. Despite these promising discoveries, legal cases and scholarship remain replete with pejorative associations with antipsychotic drug action. References to antipsychotic medications as mind-altering drugs and their effects as "synthetic sanity" misconstrue the beneficial effects these medicines have on cognition. We review the prevailing legal attitude of antipsychotic medications and contrast these views with prevailing scientific knowledge. We conclude that legal opinion is misinformed about the effects of antipsychotic medications on cognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547103234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547103234&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17592170

AN - SCOPUS:34547103234

VL - 35

SP - 235

EP - 246

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 2

ER -