Mania and insanity: An analysis of legal standards and recommendations for clinical practice

Michael J Vitacco, Ira K. Packer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Significant attention has been allotted to the relationship between psychotic disorders and insanity; however, the study of manic symptoms on criminal responsibility evaluations has been virtually ignored. Given that criminal responsibility evaluations with manic defendants pose unique challenges to forensic examiners, recommendations are needed providing guidelines to insure accurate evaluation. Based on the lack of literature in this area, this article provides a critical analysis of insanity defense standards and their potential application to manic defendants. A clinical case highlights assessment techniques and provides the basis for pragmatic recommendations. A set of guidelines for conducting insanity evaluations with manic defendants is included within the article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-95
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychology Practice
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 7 2004

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Insanity Defense
Guidelines
Psychotic Disorders

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Criminal responsibilty
  • Insanity
  • Mania

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Mania and insanity : An analysis of legal standards and recommendations for clinical practice. / Vitacco, Michael J; Packer, Ira K.

In: Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, Vol. 4, No. 3, 07.10.2004, p. 83-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{784fc63bed7d4ca6b8ebff648a7ab6ec,
title = "Mania and insanity: An analysis of legal standards and recommendations for clinical practice",
abstract = "Significant attention has been allotted to the relationship between psychotic disorders and insanity; however, the study of manic symptoms on criminal responsibility evaluations has been virtually ignored. Given that criminal responsibility evaluations with manic defendants pose unique challenges to forensic examiners, recommendations are needed providing guidelines to insure accurate evaluation. Based on the lack of literature in this area, this article provides a critical analysis of insanity defense standards and their potential application to manic defendants. A clinical case highlights assessment techniques and provides the basis for pragmatic recommendations. A set of guidelines for conducting insanity evaluations with manic defendants is included within the article.",
keywords = "Assessment, Criminal responsibilty, Insanity, Mania",
author = "Vitacco, {Michael J} and Packer, {Ira K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1300/J158v04n03_06",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "83--95",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice",
issn = "2473-2850",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mania and insanity

T2 - An analysis of legal standards and recommendations for clinical practice

AU - Vitacco, Michael J

AU - Packer, Ira K.

PY - 2004/10/7

Y1 - 2004/10/7

N2 - Significant attention has been allotted to the relationship between psychotic disorders and insanity; however, the study of manic symptoms on criminal responsibility evaluations has been virtually ignored. Given that criminal responsibility evaluations with manic defendants pose unique challenges to forensic examiners, recommendations are needed providing guidelines to insure accurate evaluation. Based on the lack of literature in this area, this article provides a critical analysis of insanity defense standards and their potential application to manic defendants. A clinical case highlights assessment techniques and provides the basis for pragmatic recommendations. A set of guidelines for conducting insanity evaluations with manic defendants is included within the article.

AB - Significant attention has been allotted to the relationship between psychotic disorders and insanity; however, the study of manic symptoms on criminal responsibility evaluations has been virtually ignored. Given that criminal responsibility evaluations with manic defendants pose unique challenges to forensic examiners, recommendations are needed providing guidelines to insure accurate evaluation. Based on the lack of literature in this area, this article provides a critical analysis of insanity defense standards and their potential application to manic defendants. A clinical case highlights assessment techniques and provides the basis for pragmatic recommendations. A set of guidelines for conducting insanity evaluations with manic defendants is included within the article.

KW - Assessment

KW - Criminal responsibilty

KW - Insanity

KW - Mania

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644295522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644295522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J158v04n03_06

DO - 10.1300/J158v04n03_06

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4644295522

VL - 4

SP - 83

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice

SN - 2473-2850

IS - 3

ER -