Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service

John S Blalock, D. C.N. Chan, W. D. Browning, Richard S Callan, S. Hackman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Original large-particle composites exhibited poor wear characteristics. With the packable composites, there has been a reintroduction of large particles. The clinical wear characteristics of such packable composites are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare wear between two types of packable composites: Alert (Jeneric Pentron) and Surefil (Dentsply Caulk). Each material was compared with and without a surface sealant. Fifty-two subjects were included. Subjects had to have two to four eligible teeth, be 21 years of age, in good health and in need of moderate to large class 2 restorations on molars, and/or a two-surface class 1 on molars. Wear was assessed, using the Moffa-Lugassy (ML) scale, by evaluating stone models made from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken at baseline and 6 months. Rating was done by four calibrated examiners using a forced consensus model. The use of a surface sealant with Alert significantly reduced the median wear rate at 6 months compared with that of the SureFil restorations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-63
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Tooth
Health
CMW cement
vinyl polysiloxane

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Composite resin
  • Wear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service. / Blalock, John S; Chan, D. C.N.; Browning, W. D.; Callan, Richard S; Hackman, S.

In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 59-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blalock, John S ; Chan, D. C.N. ; Browning, W. D. ; Callan, Richard S ; Hackman, S. / Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service. In: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 59-63.
@article{443c868d9d8f42eeba47040e305a60ab,
title = "Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service",
abstract = "Original large-particle composites exhibited poor wear characteristics. With the packable composites, there has been a reintroduction of large particles. The clinical wear characteristics of such packable composites are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare wear between two types of packable composites: Alert (Jeneric Pentron) and Surefil (Dentsply Caulk). Each material was compared with and without a surface sealant. Fifty-two subjects were included. Subjects had to have two to four eligible teeth, be 21 years of age, in good health and in need of moderate to large class 2 restorations on molars, and/or a two-surface class 1 on molars. Wear was assessed, using the Moffa-Lugassy (ML) scale, by evaluating stone models made from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken at baseline and 6 months. Rating was done by four calibrated examiners using a forced consensus model. The use of a surface sealant with Alert significantly reduced the median wear rate at 6 months compared with that of the SureFil restorations.",
keywords = "Clinical trial, Composite resin, Wear",
author = "Blalock, {John S} and Chan, {D. C.N.} and Browning, {W. D.} and Callan, {Richard S} and S. Hackman",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01540.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "59--63",
journal = "Journal of Oral Rehabilitation",
issn = "0305-182X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service

AU - Blalock, John S

AU - Chan, D. C.N.

AU - Browning, W. D.

AU - Callan, Richard S

AU - Hackman, S.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Original large-particle composites exhibited poor wear characteristics. With the packable composites, there has been a reintroduction of large particles. The clinical wear characteristics of such packable composites are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare wear between two types of packable composites: Alert (Jeneric Pentron) and Surefil (Dentsply Caulk). Each material was compared with and without a surface sealant. Fifty-two subjects were included. Subjects had to have two to four eligible teeth, be 21 years of age, in good health and in need of moderate to large class 2 restorations on molars, and/or a two-surface class 1 on molars. Wear was assessed, using the Moffa-Lugassy (ML) scale, by evaluating stone models made from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken at baseline and 6 months. Rating was done by four calibrated examiners using a forced consensus model. The use of a surface sealant with Alert significantly reduced the median wear rate at 6 months compared with that of the SureFil restorations.

AB - Original large-particle composites exhibited poor wear characteristics. With the packable composites, there has been a reintroduction of large particles. The clinical wear characteristics of such packable composites are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare wear between two types of packable composites: Alert (Jeneric Pentron) and Surefil (Dentsply Caulk). Each material was compared with and without a surface sealant. Fifty-two subjects were included. Subjects had to have two to four eligible teeth, be 21 years of age, in good health and in need of moderate to large class 2 restorations on molars, and/or a two-surface class 1 on molars. Wear was assessed, using the Moffa-Lugassy (ML) scale, by evaluating stone models made from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken at baseline and 6 months. Rating was done by four calibrated examiners using a forced consensus model. The use of a surface sealant with Alert significantly reduced the median wear rate at 6 months compared with that of the SureFil restorations.

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Composite resin

KW - Wear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645359492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645359492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01540.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01540.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16409518

AN - SCOPUS:33645359492

VL - 33

SP - 59

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

SN - 0305-182X

IS - 1

ER -