Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia

Robert Rosenheck, Scott Stroup, Richard S.E. Keefe, Joseph Patrick McEvoy, Marvin Swartz, Diana Perkins, John Hsiao, Martha Shumway, Jeffrey Lieberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Measures have not taken account of the relative importance patients place on various outcomes. Aims: To construct and evaluate a multidimensional, preference-weighted mental health index. Method: Each of over 1200 patients identified the relative importance of improvement in six domains: social life, energy, work, symptoms, confusion and side-effects. A mental health index was created in which measures of well-being in these six domains were weighted for their personal importance. Results: The strongest preference was placed on reducing confusion and the least on reducing side-effects. There was no significant difference between the unweighted and preference-weighted mental health status measures and they had similar correlations with global health status measures. Patients with greater preference for functional activities such as work had less preference for medical model goals such as reducing symptoms and had less symptoms. Conclusions: A preference-weighted mental health index demonstrated no advantage over an unweighted index.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-534
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume187
Issue numberDEC.
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Mental Health
Confusion
Health Status

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Rosenheck, R., Stroup, S., Keefe, R. S. E., McEvoy, J. P., Swartz, M., Perkins, D., ... Lieberman, J. (2005). Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(DEC.), 529-534. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.6.529

Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. / Rosenheck, Robert; Stroup, Scott; Keefe, Richard S.E.; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick; Swartz, Marvin; Perkins, Diana; Hsiao, John; Shumway, Martha; Lieberman, Jeffrey.

In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 187, No. DEC., 01.12.2005, p. 529-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenheck, R, Stroup, S, Keefe, RSE, McEvoy, JP, Swartz, M, Perkins, D, Hsiao, J, Shumway, M & Lieberman, J 2005, 'Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia', British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 187, no. DEC., pp. 529-534. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.6.529
Rosenheck, Robert ; Stroup, Scott ; Keefe, Richard S.E. ; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick ; Swartz, Marvin ; Perkins, Diana ; Hsiao, John ; Shumway, Martha ; Lieberman, Jeffrey. / Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. In: British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005 ; Vol. 187, No. DEC. pp. 529-534.
@article{1fd22204d097424599c2a5ef507fa90c,
title = "Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia",
abstract = "Background: Measures have not taken account of the relative importance patients place on various outcomes. Aims: To construct and evaluate a multidimensional, preference-weighted mental health index. Method: Each of over 1200 patients identified the relative importance of improvement in six domains: social life, energy, work, symptoms, confusion and side-effects. A mental health index was created in which measures of well-being in these six domains were weighted for their personal importance. Results: The strongest preference was placed on reducing confusion and the least on reducing side-effects. There was no significant difference between the unweighted and preference-weighted mental health status measures and they had similar correlations with global health status measures. Patients with greater preference for functional activities such as work had less preference for medical model goals such as reducing symptoms and had less symptoms. Conclusions: A preference-weighted mental health index demonstrated no advantage over an unweighted index.",
author = "Robert Rosenheck and Scott Stroup and Keefe, {Richard S.E.} and McEvoy, {Joseph Patrick} and Marvin Swartz and Diana Perkins and John Hsiao and Martha Shumway and Jeffrey Lieberman",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1192/bjp.187.6.529",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "529--534",
journal = "British Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0007-1250",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "DEC.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia

AU - Rosenheck, Robert

AU - Stroup, Scott

AU - Keefe, Richard S.E.

AU - McEvoy, Joseph Patrick

AU - Swartz, Marvin

AU - Perkins, Diana

AU - Hsiao, John

AU - Shumway, Martha

AU - Lieberman, Jeffrey

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Background: Measures have not taken account of the relative importance patients place on various outcomes. Aims: To construct and evaluate a multidimensional, preference-weighted mental health index. Method: Each of over 1200 patients identified the relative importance of improvement in six domains: social life, energy, work, symptoms, confusion and side-effects. A mental health index was created in which measures of well-being in these six domains were weighted for their personal importance. Results: The strongest preference was placed on reducing confusion and the least on reducing side-effects. There was no significant difference between the unweighted and preference-weighted mental health status measures and they had similar correlations with global health status measures. Patients with greater preference for functional activities such as work had less preference for medical model goals such as reducing symptoms and had less symptoms. Conclusions: A preference-weighted mental health index demonstrated no advantage over an unweighted index.

AB - Background: Measures have not taken account of the relative importance patients place on various outcomes. Aims: To construct and evaluate a multidimensional, preference-weighted mental health index. Method: Each of over 1200 patients identified the relative importance of improvement in six domains: social life, energy, work, symptoms, confusion and side-effects. A mental health index was created in which measures of well-being in these six domains were weighted for their personal importance. Results: The strongest preference was placed on reducing confusion and the least on reducing side-effects. There was no significant difference between the unweighted and preference-weighted mental health status measures and they had similar correlations with global health status measures. Patients with greater preference for functional activities such as work had less preference for medical model goals such as reducing symptoms and had less symptoms. Conclusions: A preference-weighted mental health index demonstrated no advantage over an unweighted index.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28644439244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28644439244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.187.6.529

DO - 10.1192/bjp.187.6.529

M3 - Article

C2 - 16319405

AN - SCOPUS:28644439244

VL - 187

SP - 529

EP - 534

JO - British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - British Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0007-1250

IS - DEC.

ER -