Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application

Fernanda Tranchesi Sadek, Cecilia Goracci, Paulo Eduardo Capel Cardoso, Franklin R. Tay, Marco Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. Materials and Methods: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. Results: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. Conclusion: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-302
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
Composite Resins
Analysis of Variance
OptiBond Solo Plus
Scotchbond

Keywords

  • Adhesive system
  • Dentin
  • Microtensile bond strength
  • Test period

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. / Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi; Goracci, Cecilia; Capel Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo; Tay, Franklin R.; Ferrari, Marco.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.12.2005, p. 297-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi ; Goracci, Cecilia ; Capel Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo ; Tay, Franklin R. ; Ferrari, Marco. / Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 297-302.
@article{1a2fe991e9d14f7bb32e28cac84a2f42,
title = "Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. Materials and Methods: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. Results: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. Conclusion: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.",
keywords = "Adhesive system, Dentin, Microtensile bond strength, Test period",
author = "Sadek, {Fernanda Tranchesi} and Cecilia Goracci and {Capel Cardoso}, {Paulo Eduardo} and Tay, {Franklin R.} and Marco Ferrari",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "297--302",
journal = "The journal of adhesive dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application

AU - Sadek, Fernanda Tranchesi

AU - Goracci, Cecilia

AU - Capel Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo

AU - Tay, Franklin R.

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. Materials and Methods: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. Results: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. Conclusion: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. Materials and Methods: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. Results: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. Conclusion: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.

KW - Adhesive system

KW - Dentin

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Test period

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30044438175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30044438175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16430010

AN - SCOPUS:30044438175

VL - 7

SP - 297

EP - 302

JO - The journal of adhesive dentistry

JF - The journal of adhesive dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 4

ER -