Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods

Lawrence D Devoe, P. Gardner, C. Dear, N. Searle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional recording of intrapartum uterine activity uses fluid-filled internal catheter systems requiring periodic maintenance. An intrauterine pressure catheter system, the INTRAN, uses an electronic pressure sensor and theoretically could obtain satisfactory uterine recordings with less maintenance. Simultaneous recordings with the INTRAN and standard fluid-filled systems were made in 40 third-trimester patients using comparably calibrated electronic monitoring systems. Comparisons of the recordings from each patient showed similar mean baseline uterine tone, contraction interval and duration. Mean peak uterine pressures were significantly higher with the INTRAN system (63 vs. 56 mm Hg). Coefficients of correlation for contraction interval, duration, peak intrauterine pressure and resting tone were .99, .87, .84 and .34, respectively. Both systems detected abnormal uterine activity equally well. Major technical failures were equally frequent with both systems; however, the fluid-filled catheters required more frequent readjustment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-814
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume34
Issue number10
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

Pressure
Catheters
Maintenance
Uterine Contraction
Third Pregnancy Trimester

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods. / Devoe, Lawrence D; Gardner, P.; Dear, C.; Searle, N.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 34, No. 10, 01.01.1989, p. 811-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c34bb35495c14babaf3ca70c1939be16,
title = "Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods",
abstract = "Conventional recording of intrapartum uterine activity uses fluid-filled internal catheter systems requiring periodic maintenance. An intrauterine pressure catheter system, the INTRAN, uses an electronic pressure sensor and theoretically could obtain satisfactory uterine recordings with less maintenance. Simultaneous recordings with the INTRAN and standard fluid-filled systems were made in 40 third-trimester patients using comparably calibrated electronic monitoring systems. Comparisons of the recordings from each patient showed similar mean baseline uterine tone, contraction interval and duration. Mean peak uterine pressures were significantly higher with the INTRAN system (63 vs. 56 mm Hg). Coefficients of correlation for contraction interval, duration, peak intrauterine pressure and resting tone were .99, .87, .84 and .34, respectively. Both systems detected abnormal uterine activity equally well. Major technical failures were equally frequent with both systems; however, the fluid-filled catheters required more frequent readjustment.",
author = "Devoe, {Lawrence D} and P. Gardner and C. Dear and N. Searle",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "811--814",
journal = "Journal of Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

AU - Gardner, P.

AU - Dear, C.

AU - Searle, N.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Conventional recording of intrapartum uterine activity uses fluid-filled internal catheter systems requiring periodic maintenance. An intrauterine pressure catheter system, the INTRAN, uses an electronic pressure sensor and theoretically could obtain satisfactory uterine recordings with less maintenance. Simultaneous recordings with the INTRAN and standard fluid-filled systems were made in 40 third-trimester patients using comparably calibrated electronic monitoring systems. Comparisons of the recordings from each patient showed similar mean baseline uterine tone, contraction interval and duration. Mean peak uterine pressures were significantly higher with the INTRAN system (63 vs. 56 mm Hg). Coefficients of correlation for contraction interval, duration, peak intrauterine pressure and resting tone were .99, .87, .84 and .34, respectively. Both systems detected abnormal uterine activity equally well. Major technical failures were equally frequent with both systems; however, the fluid-filled catheters required more frequent readjustment.

AB - Conventional recording of intrapartum uterine activity uses fluid-filled internal catheter systems requiring periodic maintenance. An intrauterine pressure catheter system, the INTRAN, uses an electronic pressure sensor and theoretically could obtain satisfactory uterine recordings with less maintenance. Simultaneous recordings with the INTRAN and standard fluid-filled systems were made in 40 third-trimester patients using comparably calibrated electronic monitoring systems. Comparisons of the recordings from each patient showed similar mean baseline uterine tone, contraction interval and duration. Mean peak uterine pressures were significantly higher with the INTRAN system (63 vs. 56 mm Hg). Coefficients of correlation for contraction interval, duration, peak intrauterine pressure and resting tone were .99, .87, .84 and .34, respectively. Both systems detected abnormal uterine activity equally well. Major technical failures were equally frequent with both systems; however, the fluid-filled catheters required more frequent readjustment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024449957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024449957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2795563

AN - SCOPUS:0024449957

VL - 34

SP - 811

EP - 814

JO - Journal of Reproductive Medicine

JF - Journal of Reproductive Medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 10

ER -