Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer

Frank E Block, G. Todd Schulte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The creation of agent mixtures from the addition of the wrong agent to a vaporizer might pose a risk to the patient. Patient injury would be more likely if the anesthesia gas monitor displayed erroneous concentration values. Conventional inhalation agent monitors do not necessarily distinguish anesthetic agents. Some modern monitors have that ability but its clinical significance has not been determined. We wanted to simulate such an erroneous mixture in a laboratory setup. Six comparisons were made. Isoflurane, Enflurane, and Halothane vaporizers were first filled with the correct agent. They were run at 5 liters/minute fresh oxygen flow at a vaporizer dial setting of 5% until it reached the 'refill' line. Then, one of two incorrect agents was added to the 'full' line. Thereafter, the vaporizer continued at the same flow and the same dial setting until it was exhausted. Vaporizer output was recorded or calculated by using three methods of measurement: mass spectrometry, conventional infrared analysis (at 3.3 micrometer wave length), and piezoelectric crystal analysis. Additional calculations were used to estimate measurements that could not be made because of lack of available equipment. In a Halothane vaporizer: Enflurane added - not a significant problem; Isoflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Isoflurane vaporizer: Halothane added - not a significant problem; Enflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Enflurane vaporizer: Isoflurane added - not a significant problem; Halothane added - The sum of the delivered Halothane MAC and the delivered Enflurane MAC was twice the expected Enflurane MAC output from vaporizer, with conventional agent monitor reading which showed decreasing agent concentration. Patient injury could be more likely in this last case. In this last case and in all cases, piezoelectric crystal monitoring correctly displayed the sum of the two agent concentrations in volumes percent. Automatic agent identification can identify erroneous agents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-61
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 1999

Fingerprint

Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Enflurane
Anesthesia
Halothane
Isoflurane
Wounds and Injuries
Inhalation
Anesthetics
Reading
Mass Spectrometry
Gases
Oxygen
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Anesthesia, inhalational
  • Anesthetics, volatile
  • Enflurane
  • Equipment
  • Errors
  • Halothane
  • Human factors
  • Isoflurane
  • Key-filling systems
  • Mixture
  • Monitoring
  • Vaporizer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer. / Block, Frank E; Todd Schulte, G.

In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, Vol. 15, No. 1, 27.05.1999, p. 57-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Block, Frank E ; Todd Schulte, G. / Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer. In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 1999 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 57-61.
@article{4aafaa0fea1e4d50b32e0c19a3e470aa,
title = "Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer",
abstract = "The creation of agent mixtures from the addition of the wrong agent to a vaporizer might pose a risk to the patient. Patient injury would be more likely if the anesthesia gas monitor displayed erroneous concentration values. Conventional inhalation agent monitors do not necessarily distinguish anesthetic agents. Some modern monitors have that ability but its clinical significance has not been determined. We wanted to simulate such an erroneous mixture in a laboratory setup. Six comparisons were made. Isoflurane, Enflurane, and Halothane vaporizers were first filled with the correct agent. They were run at 5 liters/minute fresh oxygen flow at a vaporizer dial setting of 5{\%} until it reached the 'refill' line. Then, one of two incorrect agents was added to the 'full' line. Thereafter, the vaporizer continued at the same flow and the same dial setting until it was exhausted. Vaporizer output was recorded or calculated by using three methods of measurement: mass spectrometry, conventional infrared analysis (at 3.3 micrometer wave length), and piezoelectric crystal analysis. Additional calculations were used to estimate measurements that could not be made because of lack of available equipment. In a Halothane vaporizer: Enflurane added - not a significant problem; Isoflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Isoflurane vaporizer: Halothane added - not a significant problem; Enflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Enflurane vaporizer: Isoflurane added - not a significant problem; Halothane added - The sum of the delivered Halothane MAC and the delivered Enflurane MAC was twice the expected Enflurane MAC output from vaporizer, with conventional agent monitor reading which showed decreasing agent concentration. Patient injury could be more likely in this last case. In this last case and in all cases, piezoelectric crystal monitoring correctly displayed the sum of the two agent concentrations in volumes percent. Automatic agent identification can identify erroneous agents.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, inhalational, Anesthetics, volatile, Enflurane, Equipment, Errors, Halothane, Human factors, Isoflurane, Key-filling systems, Mixture, Monitoring, Vaporizer",
author = "Block, {Frank E} and {Todd Schulte}, G.",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1023/A:1009979531850",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "57--61",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing",
issn = "1387-1307",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observations on use of wrong agent in an anesthesia agent vaporizer

AU - Block, Frank E

AU - Todd Schulte, G.

PY - 1999/5/27

Y1 - 1999/5/27

N2 - The creation of agent mixtures from the addition of the wrong agent to a vaporizer might pose a risk to the patient. Patient injury would be more likely if the anesthesia gas monitor displayed erroneous concentration values. Conventional inhalation agent monitors do not necessarily distinguish anesthetic agents. Some modern monitors have that ability but its clinical significance has not been determined. We wanted to simulate such an erroneous mixture in a laboratory setup. Six comparisons were made. Isoflurane, Enflurane, and Halothane vaporizers were first filled with the correct agent. They were run at 5 liters/minute fresh oxygen flow at a vaporizer dial setting of 5% until it reached the 'refill' line. Then, one of two incorrect agents was added to the 'full' line. Thereafter, the vaporizer continued at the same flow and the same dial setting until it was exhausted. Vaporizer output was recorded or calculated by using three methods of measurement: mass spectrometry, conventional infrared analysis (at 3.3 micrometer wave length), and piezoelectric crystal analysis. Additional calculations were used to estimate measurements that could not be made because of lack of available equipment. In a Halothane vaporizer: Enflurane added - not a significant problem; Isoflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Isoflurane vaporizer: Halothane added - not a significant problem; Enflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Enflurane vaporizer: Isoflurane added - not a significant problem; Halothane added - The sum of the delivered Halothane MAC and the delivered Enflurane MAC was twice the expected Enflurane MAC output from vaporizer, with conventional agent monitor reading which showed decreasing agent concentration. Patient injury could be more likely in this last case. In this last case and in all cases, piezoelectric crystal monitoring correctly displayed the sum of the two agent concentrations in volumes percent. Automatic agent identification can identify erroneous agents.

AB - The creation of agent mixtures from the addition of the wrong agent to a vaporizer might pose a risk to the patient. Patient injury would be more likely if the anesthesia gas monitor displayed erroneous concentration values. Conventional inhalation agent monitors do not necessarily distinguish anesthetic agents. Some modern monitors have that ability but its clinical significance has not been determined. We wanted to simulate such an erroneous mixture in a laboratory setup. Six comparisons were made. Isoflurane, Enflurane, and Halothane vaporizers were first filled with the correct agent. They were run at 5 liters/minute fresh oxygen flow at a vaporizer dial setting of 5% until it reached the 'refill' line. Then, one of two incorrect agents was added to the 'full' line. Thereafter, the vaporizer continued at the same flow and the same dial setting until it was exhausted. Vaporizer output was recorded or calculated by using three methods of measurement: mass spectrometry, conventional infrared analysis (at 3.3 micrometer wave length), and piezoelectric crystal analysis. Additional calculations were used to estimate measurements that could not be made because of lack of available equipment. In a Halothane vaporizer: Enflurane added - not a significant problem; Isoflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Isoflurane vaporizer: Halothane added - not a significant problem; Enflurane added - not a significant problem. In an Enflurane vaporizer: Isoflurane added - not a significant problem; Halothane added - The sum of the delivered Halothane MAC and the delivered Enflurane MAC was twice the expected Enflurane MAC output from vaporizer, with conventional agent monitor reading which showed decreasing agent concentration. Patient injury could be more likely in this last case. In this last case and in all cases, piezoelectric crystal monitoring correctly displayed the sum of the two agent concentrations in volumes percent. Automatic agent identification can identify erroneous agents.

KW - Anesthesia, inhalational

KW - Anesthetics, volatile

KW - Enflurane

KW - Equipment

KW - Errors

KW - Halothane

KW - Human factors

KW - Isoflurane

KW - Key-filling systems

KW - Mixture

KW - Monitoring

KW - Vaporizer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344242007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344242007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1009979531850

DO - 10.1023/A:1009979531850

M3 - Article

C2 - 12578063

AN - SCOPUS:0344242007

VL - 15

SP - 57

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

SN - 1387-1307

IS - 1

ER -