Outcome and complications of chronically implanted subdural electrodes for the treatment of medically resistant epilepsy

Fernando Vale Diaz, G. Pollock, J. Dionisio, S. R. Benbadis, W. O. Tatum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surgery for medically resistant epilepsy is safe and effective. However, when noninvasive techniques are insufficient, then consideration is given to invasive electrocorticography (EcoG). Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze results and complications of subdural electrodes placement in the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent placement of subdural electrodes (1999-2010) were considered for this study. All patients underwent a standardized pre-operative evaluation. Invasive subdural electrode placement was considered when there were inadequate ictal recordings, there was discordance between EEG and neuroimaging or the epileptogenic zone was localized near eloquent cortex. Results: Resective epilepsy surgery was performed in 70/91 patients (76.9%). Twenty-four out of seventy (34.3%) who underwent surgical resection were seizure-free (CL-I) at last follow-up. A statistical evaluation revealed a very strong trend for patients with positive lesional pre-operative MRI to have improved outcomes compared to normal brain MRI population (p =.028). There were 10 surgical related complications (11%), but no mortality or permanent morbidity. Statistical analysis demonstrated that placement of a subdural grid in any combination was statistically significant (p =.01) for surgical complications. Conclusions: Invasive monitoring is a useful and necessary technique for the surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Careful surveillance is required during the monitoring period especially when the patient has undergone large subdural grid placement. A good working hypothesis can minimize complications and achieve better outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-990
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume115
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Implanted Electrodes
Epilepsy
Electrodes
Therapeutics
Neuroimaging
Electroencephalography
Seizures
Stroke
Morbidity
Mortality
Brain
Population

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Epilepsy
  • Outcomes
  • Subdural electrodes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Outcome and complications of chronically implanted subdural electrodes for the treatment of medically resistant epilepsy. / Vale Diaz, Fernando; Pollock, G.; Dionisio, J.; Benbadis, S. R.; Tatum, W. O.

In: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, Vol. 115, No. 7, 01.07.2013, p. 985-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbb1c5409b424ef6a4b76cd6e4c57852,
title = "Outcome and complications of chronically implanted subdural electrodes for the treatment of medically resistant epilepsy",
abstract = "Background: Surgery for medically resistant epilepsy is safe and effective. However, when noninvasive techniques are insufficient, then consideration is given to invasive electrocorticography (EcoG). Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze results and complications of subdural electrodes placement in the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent placement of subdural electrodes (1999-2010) were considered for this study. All patients underwent a standardized pre-operative evaluation. Invasive subdural electrode placement was considered when there were inadequate ictal recordings, there was discordance between EEG and neuroimaging or the epileptogenic zone was localized near eloquent cortex. Results: Resective epilepsy surgery was performed in 70/91 patients (76.9{\%}). Twenty-four out of seventy (34.3{\%}) who underwent surgical resection were seizure-free (CL-I) at last follow-up. A statistical evaluation revealed a very strong trend for patients with positive lesional pre-operative MRI to have improved outcomes compared to normal brain MRI population (p =.028). There were 10 surgical related complications (11{\%}), but no mortality or permanent morbidity. Statistical analysis demonstrated that placement of a subdural grid in any combination was statistically significant (p =.01) for surgical complications. Conclusions: Invasive monitoring is a useful and necessary technique for the surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Careful surveillance is required during the monitoring period especially when the patient has undergone large subdural grid placement. A good working hypothesis can minimize complications and achieve better outcomes.",
keywords = "Complications, Epilepsy, Outcomes, Subdural electrodes",
author = "{Vale Diaz}, Fernando and G. Pollock and J. Dionisio and Benbadis, {S. R.} and Tatum, {W. O.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "985--990",
journal = "Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery",
issn = "0303-8467",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome and complications of chronically implanted subdural electrodes for the treatment of medically resistant epilepsy

AU - Vale Diaz, Fernando

AU - Pollock, G.

AU - Dionisio, J.

AU - Benbadis, S. R.

AU - Tatum, W. O.

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Background: Surgery for medically resistant epilepsy is safe and effective. However, when noninvasive techniques are insufficient, then consideration is given to invasive electrocorticography (EcoG). Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze results and complications of subdural electrodes placement in the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent placement of subdural electrodes (1999-2010) were considered for this study. All patients underwent a standardized pre-operative evaluation. Invasive subdural electrode placement was considered when there were inadequate ictal recordings, there was discordance between EEG and neuroimaging or the epileptogenic zone was localized near eloquent cortex. Results: Resective epilepsy surgery was performed in 70/91 patients (76.9%). Twenty-four out of seventy (34.3%) who underwent surgical resection were seizure-free (CL-I) at last follow-up. A statistical evaluation revealed a very strong trend for patients with positive lesional pre-operative MRI to have improved outcomes compared to normal brain MRI population (p =.028). There were 10 surgical related complications (11%), but no mortality or permanent morbidity. Statistical analysis demonstrated that placement of a subdural grid in any combination was statistically significant (p =.01) for surgical complications. Conclusions: Invasive monitoring is a useful and necessary technique for the surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Careful surveillance is required during the monitoring period especially when the patient has undergone large subdural grid placement. A good working hypothesis can minimize complications and achieve better outcomes.

AB - Background: Surgery for medically resistant epilepsy is safe and effective. However, when noninvasive techniques are insufficient, then consideration is given to invasive electrocorticography (EcoG). Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze results and complications of subdural electrodes placement in the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients who underwent placement of subdural electrodes (1999-2010) were considered for this study. All patients underwent a standardized pre-operative evaluation. Invasive subdural electrode placement was considered when there were inadequate ictal recordings, there was discordance between EEG and neuroimaging or the epileptogenic zone was localized near eloquent cortex. Results: Resective epilepsy surgery was performed in 70/91 patients (76.9%). Twenty-four out of seventy (34.3%) who underwent surgical resection were seizure-free (CL-I) at last follow-up. A statistical evaluation revealed a very strong trend for patients with positive lesional pre-operative MRI to have improved outcomes compared to normal brain MRI population (p =.028). There were 10 surgical related complications (11%), but no mortality or permanent morbidity. Statistical analysis demonstrated that placement of a subdural grid in any combination was statistically significant (p =.01) for surgical complications. Conclusions: Invasive monitoring is a useful and necessary technique for the surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Careful surveillance is required during the monitoring period especially when the patient has undergone large subdural grid placement. A good working hypothesis can minimize complications and achieve better outcomes.

KW - Complications

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Outcomes

KW - Subdural electrodes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878858860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878858860&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.007

M3 - Article

VL - 115

SP - 985

EP - 990

JO - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

JF - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

SN - 0303-8467

IS - 7

ER -