Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Michael J. Persky, William Greer Albergotti, Tanya J. Rath, Mark W. Kubik, Shira Abberbock, Mathew Geltzeiler, Seungwon Kim, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Robert L. Ferris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare positive margin rates between the 2 most common subsites of oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the base of tongue (BOT) and the tonsil, as well as identify preoperative imaging characteristics that predispose toward positive margins. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Subjects and Methods: We compared the final and intraoperative positive margin rate between TORS resections for tonsil and BOT oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), as well as the effect of margins on treatment. A blinded neuroradiologist examined the preoperative imaging of BOT tumors to measure their dimensions and patterns of spread and provided a prediction of final margin results. Results: Between January 2010 and May 2016, a total of 254 patients underwent TORS for OPSCC. A total of 140 patients who underwent TORS for T1/T2 OPSCC met inclusion criteria. A final positive margin is significantly more likely for BOT tumors than tonsil tumors (19.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P =.004) and likewise for intraoperative margins of BOT and tonsil tumors (35.3% vs 12.4%, respectively; P =.002). A positive final margin is 10 times more likely to receive chemoradiation compared to a negative margin, controlling for extracapsular spread and nodal status (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-59.6; P =.02). Preoperative imaging characteristics and subjective radiologic examination of BOT tumors did not correlate with final margin status. Conclusion: Positive margins are significantly more likely during TORS BOT resections compared to tonsil resections. More research is needed to help surgeons predict which T1/T2 tumors will be difficult to completely extirpate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)660-666
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume158
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Robotics
Tongue
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Palatine Tonsil
Neoplasms
Tertiary Care Centers
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Research

Keywords

  • BOT resection
  • TORS
  • margin status
  • margins
  • oropharyngeal SCC
  • radical tonsillectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma. / Persky, Michael J.; Albergotti, William Greer; Rath, Tanya J.; Kubik, Mark W.; Abberbock, Shira; Geltzeiler, Mathew; Kim, Seungwon; Duvvuri, Umamaheswar; Ferris, Robert L.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 158, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 660-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Persky, Michael J. ; Albergotti, William Greer ; Rath, Tanya J. ; Kubik, Mark W. ; Abberbock, Shira ; Geltzeiler, Mathew ; Kim, Seungwon ; Duvvuri, Umamaheswar ; Ferris, Robert L. / Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2018 ; Vol. 158, No. 4. pp. 660-666.
@article{d7eb8bfcd1494d80a35f9277e935e57c,
title = "Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma",
abstract = "Objective: To compare positive margin rates between the 2 most common subsites of oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the base of tongue (BOT) and the tonsil, as well as identify preoperative imaging characteristics that predispose toward positive margins. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Subjects and Methods: We compared the final and intraoperative positive margin rate between TORS resections for tonsil and BOT oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), as well as the effect of margins on treatment. A blinded neuroradiologist examined the preoperative imaging of BOT tumors to measure their dimensions and patterns of spread and provided a prediction of final margin results. Results: Between January 2010 and May 2016, a total of 254 patients underwent TORS for OPSCC. A total of 140 patients who underwent TORS for T1/T2 OPSCC met inclusion criteria. A final positive margin is significantly more likely for BOT tumors than tonsil tumors (19.6{\%} vs 4.5{\%}, respectively, P =.004) and likewise for intraoperative margins of BOT and tonsil tumors (35.3{\%} vs 12.4{\%}, respectively; P =.002). A positive final margin is 10 times more likely to receive chemoradiation compared to a negative margin, controlling for extracapsular spread and nodal status (odds ratio, 9.6; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.6-59.6; P =.02). Preoperative imaging characteristics and subjective radiologic examination of BOT tumors did not correlate with final margin status. Conclusion: Positive margins are significantly more likely during TORS BOT resections compared to tonsil resections. More research is needed to help surgeons predict which T1/T2 tumors will be difficult to completely extirpate.",
keywords = "BOT resection, TORS, margin status, margins, oropharyngeal SCC, radical tonsillectomy",
author = "Persky, {Michael J.} and Albergotti, {William Greer} and Rath, {Tanya J.} and Kubik, {Mark W.} and Shira Abberbock and Mathew Geltzeiler and Seungwon Kim and Umamaheswar Duvvuri and Ferris, {Robert L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599817742852",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "660--666",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma

AU - Persky, Michael J.

AU - Albergotti, William Greer

AU - Rath, Tanya J.

AU - Kubik, Mark W.

AU - Abberbock, Shira

AU - Geltzeiler, Mathew

AU - Kim, Seungwon

AU - Duvvuri, Umamaheswar

AU - Ferris, Robert L.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Objective: To compare positive margin rates between the 2 most common subsites of oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the base of tongue (BOT) and the tonsil, as well as identify preoperative imaging characteristics that predispose toward positive margins. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Subjects and Methods: We compared the final and intraoperative positive margin rate between TORS resections for tonsil and BOT oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), as well as the effect of margins on treatment. A blinded neuroradiologist examined the preoperative imaging of BOT tumors to measure their dimensions and patterns of spread and provided a prediction of final margin results. Results: Between January 2010 and May 2016, a total of 254 patients underwent TORS for OPSCC. A total of 140 patients who underwent TORS for T1/T2 OPSCC met inclusion criteria. A final positive margin is significantly more likely for BOT tumors than tonsil tumors (19.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P =.004) and likewise for intraoperative margins of BOT and tonsil tumors (35.3% vs 12.4%, respectively; P =.002). A positive final margin is 10 times more likely to receive chemoradiation compared to a negative margin, controlling for extracapsular spread and nodal status (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-59.6; P =.02). Preoperative imaging characteristics and subjective radiologic examination of BOT tumors did not correlate with final margin status. Conclusion: Positive margins are significantly more likely during TORS BOT resections compared to tonsil resections. More research is needed to help surgeons predict which T1/T2 tumors will be difficult to completely extirpate.

AB - Objective: To compare positive margin rates between the 2 most common subsites of oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the base of tongue (BOT) and the tonsil, as well as identify preoperative imaging characteristics that predispose toward positive margins. Study Design: Case series with chart review. Setting: Tertiary care referral center. Subjects and Methods: We compared the final and intraoperative positive margin rate between TORS resections for tonsil and BOT oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), as well as the effect of margins on treatment. A blinded neuroradiologist examined the preoperative imaging of BOT tumors to measure their dimensions and patterns of spread and provided a prediction of final margin results. Results: Between January 2010 and May 2016, a total of 254 patients underwent TORS for OPSCC. A total of 140 patients who underwent TORS for T1/T2 OPSCC met inclusion criteria. A final positive margin is significantly more likely for BOT tumors than tonsil tumors (19.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P =.004) and likewise for intraoperative margins of BOT and tonsil tumors (35.3% vs 12.4%, respectively; P =.002). A positive final margin is 10 times more likely to receive chemoradiation compared to a negative margin, controlling for extracapsular spread and nodal status (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-59.6; P =.02). Preoperative imaging characteristics and subjective radiologic examination of BOT tumors did not correlate with final margin status. Conclusion: Positive margins are significantly more likely during TORS BOT resections compared to tonsil resections. More research is needed to help surgeons predict which T1/T2 tumors will be difficult to completely extirpate.

KW - BOT resection

KW - TORS

KW - margin status

KW - margins

KW - oropharyngeal SCC

KW - radical tonsillectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045016576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045016576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599817742852

DO - 10.1177/0194599817742852

M3 - Article

C2 - 29182490

AN - SCOPUS:85045016576

VL - 158

SP - 660

EP - 666

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 4

ER -